Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
ballyclover  
#1 Posted : 22 December 2015 14:49:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ballyclover

Hi Yet again I have been put in a position that goes against all that I have learnt during my time as H and S manager. Urgent repairs are required to a damaged equipment at height, several quotes for repairs and the guy in charge of authorising has once again said he will repair it himself. I have already discussed the access as needing scaffold to be in a secure situation. This guy has said he can hire and repair for a fraction of the cost. Many years as a repair man in his opinion qualifies him to be able to do this. The company director is happy for him to do it, less costs. I on the other hand am not, due to the working at height risks and lack of professional qualification. So what can I do, the health and safety of all employees starts with me but the ultimate responsible person Is the director of the company. Should I just wash my hand of it, and wait for the accident to occur or work with the guy, do a risk assessment and hope he see's sense, which of course he won't In reality it is not a difficult job, I could most likely do it myself but for me that isn't the point. Why do they choose to ignore any advice given. The problem is he is likely to carry out the work in my absence to prevent me getting involved. Really am at my wits end. Has anyone else been in such a situation that no matter what you say or do its never taken on board?
Invictus  
#2 Posted : 22 December 2015 15:04:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

ballyclover wrote:
Hi Yet again I have been put in a position that goes against all that I have learnt during my time as H and S manager. Urgent repairs are required to a damaged equipment at height, several quotes for repairs and the guy in charge of authorising has once again said he will repair it himself. I have already discussed the access as needing scaffold to be in a secure situation. This guy has said he can hire and repair for a fraction of the cost. Many years as a repair man in his opinion qualifies him to be able to do this. The company director is happy for him to do it, less costs. I on the other hand am not, due to the working at height risks and lack of professional qualification. So what can I do, the health and safety of all employees starts with me but the ultimate responsible person Is the director of the company. Should I just wash my hand of it, and wait for the accident to occur or work with the guy, do a risk assessment and hope he see's sense, which of course he won't In reality it is not a difficult job, I could most likely do it myself but for me that isn't the point. Why do they choose to ignore any advice given. The problem is he is likely to carry out the work in my absence to prevent me getting involved. Really am at my wits end. Has anyone else been in such a situation that no matter what you say or do its never taken on board?
Make sure you put it in writing to the director stating all the reasions why. He can then make an informed decision>
firesafety101  
#3 Posted : 22 December 2015 15:06:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Yes I have and since I have been self employed I have walked away from a number clients who have ignored my advice. It is different when PAYE and to walk away from the job means loss of earnings etc. etc. My advice to you would be to work with the Director and the worker to try to ensure proper safe working is adopted, even if that means you write RA and MS for the work, with their input, ensure they are read and signed as understood, then you can go and have a nice Christmas knowing that you have done your best. Good luck
ballyclover  
#4 Posted : 22 December 2015 15:12:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ballyclover

Thank you for your replies, the only choice I would have is to do as you have suggested, work with the guy, provide safe work and risk assessments and hope it all works out ok. This is not the 1st time I have faced this problem, every time there is a need for work to be carried out I am told this guy will do it, and I have to sit there and think why do you even bother to employ me as a H and S manager.
chris42  
#5 Posted : 22 December 2015 15:24:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

You don't say what work they will be doing ? Is your objection just the height issue or is it they will be carrying out electrical / gas repairs etc. Something that has a qualification in its own right or is it they will be replacing a couple of bolts etc something a half decent mechanic could manage. My concern would be if it is a recognised trade / skill then you would be condoning the of an unqualified person, by assisting in creating a method statement / risk assessment. I think you need to take care and qualify to yourself what is actually to be done. If it is just the height issue and they are willing to get a proper scaffolding company in, and no special skills / quals for the actual work, then maybe. Chris
calum.cameron  
#6 Posted : 22 December 2015 15:25:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
calum.cameron

You are only required to take reasonable steps in your capacity. I'm guessing you are not "responsible" for safety in that you are not the most senior person in the business and haven't signed the H&S policy statement. With this in mind it is important you remember your role as an "advisor". If your employer chooses to ignore you then more fool him. I would tend to talk to the individual and tell them that if they are going to ignore your advice you will send him a formal notification of your advice and then its up to them if they follow it. Look after yourself if they are not prepared to listen to sense and wait to get your "I told you so" degree. You cant educate pork!
martin1  
#7 Posted : 22 December 2015 15:26:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
martin1

I wouldn't work with this guy to complete his documentation if the choice was mine. I would feel uncomfortable under circumstances where my advice has already been ignored or over-ridden. I'd make my point clearly known - in writing - to the MD and then step away. I wouldn't want to compromise my position by working with a cowboy.
Andrew W Walker  
#8 Posted : 22 December 2015 15:34:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Andrew W Walker

Been in a similar situation. Racking being installed and the installer was walking across beams like the old skyscraper erectors in New York donkey's years ago. I made sure that my indignation was documented- that was all I could do. No matter how much I protested, it was ignored. The job had to be done- and it had to be done quick. I really do feel for people put in this position. Andy
calum.cameron  
#9 Posted : 22 December 2015 15:55:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
calum.cameron

Couldn't agree more Andy. Document it and step back. It is HIS responsibility and he will be far more harshly dealt with for ignoring good advice in the case of a prosecution or enforcement action. Merry Xmas and try not to worry about it. You have done all you can!
Corfield35303  
#10 Posted : 22 December 2015 16:02:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Corfield35303

A true test - somewhat illogically, the only way for people in some SMEs to start taking safety seriously is for there to be an incident. Work with them to assess risks and get a method statement together, if the fixer is lacking in competency what does this look like? What would be needed to make him competent, a briefing, some training, or is equipment needed? There might be a case for a small package of recommendations to make him competent and the work OK, which might not be that expensive, and actually pre-empt the next time this happens, especially if it is compared to the costs of getting a contractor in...?
Rees21880  
#11 Posted : 22 December 2015 16:21:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rees21880

I don't know the whole story, nor the task in hand, but I agree that attempting to work with the contractor is the right way forward. There are simple ways of working at height to carry out repairs etc in a safe manner. However, there will come a point where you can only get so far. If, at this point, he is still not wanting to play ball and work safely, then I'd throw him (metaphorically of course!) off site. Yes - your Director will be cheesed off, but after a careful explanation of the legal inaccuracies, corporate manslaughter possibilities (to him personally as well as the company) and costs due to fines, increased insurance premiums etc he'll eventually understand that this is the right action. Have I done this in practice? Not often, but yes....an electrician refused to carry out works with the circuit de-energised, despite his colleague agreeing to my suggestions. After a long conversation (90 minutes!) he was eventually invited to leave our site and not to return. Pete
ballyclover  
#12 Posted : 22 December 2015 18:56:16(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ballyclover

calum.cameron wrote:
You are only required to take reasonable steps in your capacity. I'm guessing you are not "responsible" for safety in that you are not the most senior person in the business and haven't signed the H&S policy statement. With this in mind it is important you remember your role as an "advisor". If your employer chooses to ignore you then more fool him. I would tend to talk to the individual and tell them that if they are going to ignore your advice you will send him a formal notification of your advice and then its up to them if they follow it. Look after yourself if they are not prepared to listen to sense and wait to get your "I told you so" degree. You cant educate pork!
I am the person responsible for H and S with in the company, I wrote, and update the policy and sign this as the person responsible, however the overall person responsible for seeing that H and S is being worked to is the managing director
ballyclover  
#13 Posted : 22 December 2015 19:04:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ballyclover

Rees21880 wrote:
I don't know the whole story, nor the task in hand, but I agree that attempting to work with the contractor is the right way forward. There are simple ways of working at height to carry out repairs etc in a safe manner. However, there will come a point where you can only get so far. If, at this point, he is still not wanting to play ball and work safely, then I'd throw him (metaphorically of course!) off site. Yes - your Director will be cheesed off, but after a careful explanation of the legal inaccuracies, corporate manslaughter possibilities (to him personally as well as the company) and costs due to fines, increased insurance premiums etc he'll eventually understand that this is the right action. Have I done this in practice? Not often, but yes....an electrician refused to carry out works with the circuit de-energised, despite his colleague agreeing to my suggestions. After a long conversation (90 minutes!) he was eventually invited to leave our site and not to return. Pete
The work required is too some damaged to the factory walls, these are corragated panels damaged in the recent poor weather at a height of around 5-7 meters. The actually task is not a difficult job, its basically re securing the panels to the frame. The job will require a suitable platform. All 3 contractors who quoted for the job have said scaffold will be required. The guy i work with is happy to go out and hire scaffold, or use his mates. It will not be put together by a qualified operator. I have the added worry that some of panels are hanging off, of they were to break away on him while he works on them i can see serious injury. I think the solution here is to carry out a full risk assesment with him, pointing out risks i feel that need to be addressed. The problem is he is one of these guys that is never wrong, and he has the ear of company director. Basically as you have all said, protect my self first
Bambino  
#14 Posted : 22 December 2015 19:30:06(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Bambino

Ballyclover you have my sympathy, this situation sounds familiar and can really frustrate.
calum.cameron  
#15 Posted : 23 December 2015 07:46:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
calum.cameron

Bally Clover-i'm confused. If you are H&S Manager and the MD is responsible for delivery of safety why are YOU signing the policy statement. I have to say that is a crazy situation. You need to take action to correct this. The most senior person in the business should sign the policy statement. The current situation is crazy and wrong! You need to refer him to the IOD guidance for directors showing how to drive culture in the proper way. I would do this ASAP.
imponderabilius  
#16 Posted : 23 December 2015 08:38:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
imponderabilius

True, policy has to be signed by directors, not H&S manager. As to the job - do RA and MS, get the guy to sign it for you. Do toolbox talk, make him sign it. As to the scaffold - it has to be erected by competent person and scaff-tagged. If it is an aluminium scaffold, must be erected by PASMA qualified person. If it's not, make sure you send an email to your director stating these requirements. If the job is carried out when you're away and all the above are in place, you're bulletproof. Sometimes there's nothing more you can do. Good luck and don't worry, such situations are sometimes (unfortunately) part of our job.
bob youel  
#17 Posted : 23 December 2015 08:43:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Listen to CC and act quickly as the advice is very sound ------------ I am concerned for U in that a person acting as the H&S has signind a companies H&S policy [or could it be that the MD is putting U in the frame?] = that said at the same time I know just how hard it is out there as employers on the whole are reverting to type with good working environments being scarce and I appreciate that being a lone voice is hard - step back and re-evaluate your position, duties, responses etc. and go from there as its U who has to work there best of luck
frankc  
#18 Posted : 23 December 2015 21:49:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
frankc

imponderabilius wrote:
If it is an aluminium scaffold, must be erected by PASMA qualified person.
Not true mate. The Mobile Tower must be assembled by a competent person who has had suitable and sufficient training. PASMA are an accredited body and some clients may insist on it. However, to say they MUST be PASMA trained is incorrect.
Safety Man 1  
#19 Posted : 24 December 2015 06:55:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Man 1

I would use a recognised training provider usually PASMA as I have came across in the past clients to don't accept certain in house training. As far for the H&S Policy the most senior person in the organisation should be signing this. As said previously ensure RAMS, TBT''s are signed up to and a permit to work system where necessary
Safety Smurf  
#20 Posted : 24 December 2015 10:05:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

What are these corrugated panels made of?
Ron Hunter  
#21 Posted : 30 December 2015 00:10:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

To those who suggest that the H&S bod write the RA and MS: I think that an incorrect approach. Smacks of desperation. Are YOU qualified (competent) to do that job? If not, then you aren't competent to produce a Method Statement.
Royden  
#22 Posted : 31 December 2015 00:33:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Royden

I have been in a similar position a few years ago. Chairman ignore my advice so I decided to work with the contractor to create a safe system of work. I did RAMS had him signed etc. unfortunately the contractor still did his own thing and one of his employee fell from height and died. I ended up being prosecuted, and was aquited. Apart from the document I produced for the contractor, I also had email to prove that I had higlighted my concerns to the chair. I would not advice doing any RAMS for anyone contracted to carry out work for your business. I must say I learnt quite a lot from the trial
Safety Man 1  
#23 Posted : 31 December 2015 14:03:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Man 1

Totally agree all RAMS should be developed by the contractor and submitted to the H&S department for review and only pasesd when suitable and sufficient for the task
paul.skyrme  
#24 Posted : 01 January 2016 21:40:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

If the H&S dept are not competent to create the RAMS, how can they be competent to assess if the contractors RAMS are adequate. If the person assessing a RAMS is not competent to develop the RAMS then they are not competent to review the RAMS. Hence why IMHO many H&S "advisors" are getting such a bad name, they are trying to comment on RAMS & work that they have no idea on how it should be done, thus, they are then belittled by those who are competent to do the work, do know how it should be done, safely, which in turn gives H&S a bad name.
Colossians 1:14  
#25 Posted : 04 January 2016 07:30:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Colossians 1:14

I can empathise with the OP's predicament. I had a job a couple of years ago where I went to work for a company that manufactured anodes in a foundry type environment. The company seemed really proactive and I was tasked with getting the ball rolling with installing 18001. What the company really wanted was a 'box ticker' for PQQ's being received from the oil and gas industry. The General Manager talked a good game in front of clients but in reality he was a nightmare. After a couple of months I started to 'blind' copy every email I sent to him with regard to my concerns with regard to H&S. After about 6 months of me being at the company an HSE inspector walked in off the street (they were targeting foundry environments) and put together a list of things that needed to be improved after walking round the workplace. The wearing of PPE was one issue. I had been banging on about PPE not being worn since day one of my arrival! Anyway one Monday morning, after I had been on holiday for a week, I came in to be told that a caster had been injured when molten metal had exploded into his face while he was carrying out his work. (This employee turned out to be the General Manager's son). I immediately reported the incident to RIDDOR and met with the General Manager. He wanted to discipline the employee for not wearing his visor, I told him it was a management failing and that not wearing visors is commonplace as advised many, many times. The next morning when I got into work I was told to go home and the company were considering dismissing me because I was not pro-active in doing my job (I had been there 11 months, so had no employment rights as such). This made me furious, they could have just got rid of me without too much hassle due to my short time served there but calling into question my work I was not having. (My view is that with me out the way the GM would try and put the blame on me to the HSE for not carrying out remedial measures resulting from the HSE inspection at the company) Anyhow, I got a solicitor involved that helped me draft a letter to the General Manager refuting his allegations of my poor workmanship. The General Manager couldn't have got his HR people to meet me fast enough, I told the company I would not be going back to work for them. My solicitor negotiated a good settlement agreement with the company. The HSE requested my emails, I do not know what happened after!
John M  
#26 Posted : 04 January 2016 10:10:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John M

paul.skyrme wrote:
If the H&S dept are not competent to create the RAMS, how can they be competent to assess if the contractors RAMS are adequate. If the person assessing a RAMS is not competent to develop the RAMS then they are not competent to review the RAMS. Hence why IMHO many H&S "advisors" are getting such a bad name, they are trying to comment on RAMS & work that they have no idea on how it should be done, thus, they are then belittled by those who are competent to do the work, do know how it should be done, safely, which in turn gives H&S a bad name.
Paul is on the money again. Great post. I review hundreds of RAMS (no legal requirement for Method Statements) every week and also JSAs before signing off as approved or rejected. I often wonder who writes these works of fiction. If I do not understand the contents or are in any way concerned I go to speak to the author and the workmen intending to carry out the work. I have on several occasions assisted the contractor in completing risk assessments and rescue plans so that the job continues safely. One example was on the Shard in London where the painting contractor was faced with a situation (painting external at height {1000ft} in a challenging and almost impossible situation. We discussed the intended work at length involving all of the actors including all relevant parties and then formulated the work plan to a coherent and successful whole. Clearly there was no planning for safety or review by the then CDM Co-ordinator. Thankfully those creatures are now consigned to history. I would suggest that the OP takes a long hard look at the intended work and attempt to work with the contractor to ensure that a suitable and sufficient risk assessment is completed. As Paul has indicated if he is competent he should at first review/ instance be able to establish whether the written assessment is suitable and sufficient. Jon
Matthew Fisher  
#27 Posted : 06 January 2016 11:39:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Matthew Fisher

I would attempt to work with them and attempt to make them understand your concerns, however, you are unable to make someone do something they don't want to do. So make sure you put it in writing that you are advising them to do/not do certain things, and then the responsibility rests with them. All you can do is advise and hope they do the responsible thing. Short of handcuffs there isn't a great deal else you can do. That's the difficulty with certain H&S jobs, not being able to ENSURE things are done safely.
sadlass  
#28 Posted : 07 January 2016 18:36:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
sadlass

"I am the person responsible for H and S with in the company, I wrote, and update the policy and sign this as the person responsible, however the overall person responsible for seeing that H and S is being worked to is the managing director" Oh dear. The word 'responsible' - crops up three times here. Safety practitioners often seem unclear as to their role and responsibilities, and employers exploit this (possibly unwittingly). As a safety practitioner I am not responsible for the H&S of 'all' employees. I am definitely not responsible for setting, or signing, policy. I AM responsible for giving, or accessing, competent and timely advice to help to keep managers and the organisation out of trouble, which should also then help to keep people safe. I can, if pressed, draft policy on behalf of others as I know the words to use, but usually create a couple of versions and ask for the preferred option, with any further amendments. This tends to make the recipient read them, in order to make the choice. I am not responsible for, or signing, policy. I do not 'do' risk assessment or write method statements, although I have seen hundreds in my time, and offer my input and act as critical friend to those who do. I need to know techniques and standards for RA, and can offer help on which tactics might work best for a situation. I do not approve or authorise work procedures or practices, except very general and simplistic ones which cover everyone, such as how to sit on a chair (!). If I have an issue with the way work is being done, I involve the supervisor in analysing the situation and finding their own solution. If I disagree with the outcome I discuss, then put it in writing, and step away. Sometimes I get over-excited where the risk is (my opinion) significant. Then I contact the person who IS responsible, and let them make the decisions. I stopped applying for jobs which say that the SP 'will be responsible for H&S compliance' or 'for H&S of all staff' a while back, although there seem to be more of these nowadays. Is this just me?
garryw1509  
#29 Posted : 08 January 2016 09:07:49(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
garryw1509

sadlass wrote:
"I am the person responsible for H and S with in the company, I wrote, and update the policy and sign this as the person responsible, however the overall person responsible for seeing that H and S is being worked to is the managing director" Oh dear. The word 'responsible' - crops up three times here. Safety practitioners often seem unclear as to their role and responsibilities, and employers exploit this (possibly unwittingly). As a safety practitioner I am not responsible for the H&S of 'all' employees. I am definitely not responsible for setting, or signing, policy. I AM responsible for giving, or accessing, competent and timely advice to help to keep managers and the organisation out of trouble, which should also then help to keep people safe. I can, if pressed, draft policy on behalf of others as I know the words to use, but usually create a couple of versions and ask for the preferred option, with any further amendments. This tends to make the recipient read them, in order to make the choice. I am not responsible for, or signing, policy. I do not 'do' risk assessment or write method statements, although I have seen hundreds in my time, and offer my input and act as critical friend to those who do. I need to know techniques and standards for RA, and can offer help on which tactics might work best for a situation. I do not approve or authorise work procedures or practices, except very general and simplistic ones which cover everyone, such as how to sit on a chair (!). If I have an issue with the way work is being done, I involve the supervisor in analysing the situation and finding their own solution. If I disagree with the outcome I discuss, then put it in writing, and step away. Sometimes I get over-excited where the risk is (my opinion) significant. Then I contact the person who IS responsible, and let them make the decisions. I stopped applying for jobs which say that the SP 'will be responsible for H&S compliance' or 'for H&S of all staff' a while back, although there seem to be more of these nowadays. Is this just me?
No, pretty much on the mark for me. Good Post. To say the Health & Safety person (Manager / Advisor whatever) should have expertise in every single activity is just silly. To say I have "responsibilitiy" for all "Health & Safety" is as equally misunderstood by many. Personally I have experience, expertise and competence in so many areas, construction, OHL, civils, manufacturing etc. on projects worth 100s of millions; however every now and then a task or activity will come up I don't fully understand or have expertise in. At that point you discuss, and communicate with the experts and the people doing the work to understand and "see" the task. You use you're skills and experience to determine if the people doing the work fully understand and give you a confidence they have a sound SSOW. Every day is a school day and thats the beauty of our job.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.