Rank: Forum user
|
Hi all,
Considering that the RRO and BS9999 state fire escape routes must be kept clear of obstructions at all times, how do shops get away with having displays, clothing etc. on the escape route. Many shops are single entrance/exit to the public as the store rooms are coded access (that do not have an automatic release upon the activation of an alarm). Assuming that they only have one escape route, no matter where you are in the shop, your escape route is not clear of obstructions, and I can't see why this is not a common issue raised with the HSE??
Opinions gratefully received :)
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Shops are not covered by the HSE enforcement falls to local Authority, And the RRO is enforced by the local fire and rescue service.
Perhaps your question should be why its not raised by the local Fire service.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Brian Hagyard wrote:Shops are not covered by the HSE enforcement falls to local Authority, And the RRO is enforced by the local fire and rescue service.
Perhaps your question should be why its not raised by the local Fire service. Beat me to it!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Agreed, that should indeed be my question. I wasn't really paying enough attention when I added in the HSE part.
So, how do the shops still get away with doing what they do, when clearly the RRO says they shouldn't be.
What am I missing?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The RRO states (Article 14) ___________________________________________ 14.—(1) Where necessary in order to safeguard the safety of relevant persons, the responsible person must ensure that routes to emergency exits from premises and the exits themselves are kept clear at all times. ___________________________________________ Note the use of the words 'where necessary'. This is where the risk assessment bit comes in. The Govt FS Guides can help (see below). Fire safety is all about time. Ensuring the fire is discovered as early as practicable, the warning is given without delay and ensuring staff can reach a place of safety in a reasonable time. To allow this, travel distances to a place of ultimate safety (outside) are limited, especially if escape is possible in one direction. Within that space, there must be a space to access the escape route, but goods and stock are allowed. Where it is not possible to get to a place outside to an ultimate place of safety, it's necessary to bring that place of safety into the building by providing 'protected routes'. These are staircases and corridors that are kept free from combustibles and ignition sources. For more complex premises, engineered solutions may extend travel distances I agree that many shops have coded doors to the rear of the public space, some are even marked as fire exits. This may be ok, but rarely is! Have a look here as the Govt have provided a free download with basic fire safety information. Its a useful read for low to medium risk premises https://www.gov.uk/gover...ssment-offices-and-shops
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks mssy,
I already have, and have read through the FS guidance, thank you :)
My main gripe with the FS guidance and legislation etc. is that as the amount you read increases, so does the amount of different answers you find that contradict each other. You can find an answer to a question, then un answer it when your reading something else. I understand that no one building is the same, as the precautions put in place will be as a result of the RA. I tend to wonder why certain places do or don't have certain precautions in place but its obviously impossible to know why without reading the FRA.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
They get away with it because there are now so few EHO's that the chances of being "caught" are almost nil. If you have concerns about a specific shop you should raise it with your council EHO or fire service.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I remember being in my local supermarket (Every little helps) some years back when the fire alarm sounded, and made for the nearest signed exit. "You can't go that way Sir" I was informed "That's a staff only area"....................
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Ron Hunter wrote:I remember being in my local supermarket (Every little helps) some years back when the fire alarm sounded, and made for the nearest signed exit. "You can't go that way Sir" I was informed "That's a staff only area".................... Sadly that does not surprise me in the slightest.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ron Hunter wrote:I remember being in my local supermarket (Every little helps) some years back when the fire alarm sounded, and made for the nearest signed exit. "You can't go that way Sir" I was informed "That's a staff only area".................... And I recall my first day on Jury Service recently. Let me stress, this was a Crown Court where many who do not comply with FS legislation end up!! We had just had the H&S briefing from a bored clerk reading from a clipboard. The briefing included what to do if the fire alarm sounds. 25 minutes later it did activate and the jurors yet to be allocated a job were waiting in this huge space were told 'Stay where you are, its a test'. Then 2 mins later by 'Follow me'!! We were then led around the houses on a very long route to the car park and NOT via the route we'd been told 30 mins before! Later I asked the clerk why we didn't use the prescribed route. She answered that the door was sealed & we had to avoid it as she didn't know where replacement seals were kept if we broke it. That's alright then :)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Some coded doors do have the ability to release upon alarm activation, but swipe card access with release would probably be better where there is an added security issue. I think part of the issue is its felt that shops are generally low risk, and depending on the type of shop they may well be- it doesn't excuse complacency though.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Jodie,
Yes that is true, I think that the electronic coded doors are normally acceptable, particularly in low risk buildings, as they do release upon the activation of the alarm. It is mainly the manual coded door locks that are the issue, particularly for members of the public who obviously won't know the code.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
be interesting to know if this is an independent, small chain or large national retailer. Most of the larger nationals will have sufficient quality of competent advice just not always sufficient quantity and the message gets diluted the further away it gets from the source.
There are companies I could name where the store manager would have a lot more to fear from internal auditors and H&S staff than they would from enforcing authorities.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Whenever I see blocked fire exits in shops I mention it to the staff and take a photo.
If no immediate action taken I phone the local fire safety officer and report it to them.
I always get a call back to say what they have done, and thanking me for my action.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Safety Smurf, shamefully its national retailers that I know of doing so.
Without naming names, the one that comes straight to mind is a shop (that in order to hide its identity I will call Baker Ted), anyone guess the shop ha
FS101 - good on you!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
About 18 months ago, I noticed a well known travel agency "got done" for blocking fire exits in one of their shops. About 6 weeks later I was in the one in my hometown booking a holiday and....... well you guessed the rest.
I pointed this out to the staff but got blank looks. So I e-mailed their head office and got a thank you reply. Couple of weeks later as I passed by, I went in just to look. Obviously there was no change I meant to go back with a camera but lost interest
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Matthew Fisher wrote:Safety Smurf, shamefully its national retailers that I know of doing so.
Without naming names, the one that comes straight to mind is a shop (that in order to hide its identity I will call Baker Ted), anyone guess the shop ha
FS101 - good on you!! My bad. I had forgotten the law unto itself which is fashion retail. The bigger ones are generally better.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
As members of IOSH and/or similar professional organisation don't we have a duty to report anything untoward that may be a denger to the health and safety of the public?
I always thought I did and that's why I alwarys try to do so ething about it.
Question: would you sit in a restaurant at a table that was positioned in such a way that it blocked the fire exit ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Matthew Fisher wrote:Hi all,
Considering that the RRO and BS9999 state fire escape routes must be kept clear of obstructions at all times, how do shops get away with having displays, clothing etc. on the escape route.
Opinions gratefully received :)
Thanks With fire safety I have found that their is a difference between an 'escape route' and 'a means of escape'. My thoughts - an emergency exit must not be obstructed, this is an easy one. However, means of escape is a different and sometimes difficult issue. For example in an office block or hotel there would normally be dedicated (and protected) escape routes, i.e. corridors, stairwells and lobbies, and these must be kept clear. Most big shop retailers due to their large floor sales area's don't have dedicated protected escape routes as such, just exits from the shop floor area. So..... I guess this is why they get away with it, i.e. you can manoeuvre round the displays to aid your escape and therefore your means of escape is not blocked. I am not in agreeing what is happening in these stored (and some ore worse that others) just trying to give a view on the OP question.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
quote=FireSafety101]As members of IOSH and/or similar professional organisation don't we have a duty to report anything untoward that may be a denger to the health and safety of the public?
I always thought I did and that's why I alwarys try to do so ething about it.
Question: would you sit in a restaurant at a table that was positioned in such a way that it blocked the fire exit ? Do we? When was that a requisite of being a member of IOSH?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
the truth is as PH2 said as there are very few enforcers out there these days so U can have as many laws as U want but with no enforcers how do U enforce your laws and businesses know the situation so do not bother?
and I do not believe that H&S bods outside their work environment have anymore a duty to report things than any other person on the street
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi
I think there is perhaps a mis-understanding here. An escape route would be a protected corridor or stairway, or similar. A shop floor has many ways to the exit. |IN small units this would often be the front door or there may be an additional fire excape either off the floor or via a maglock out the back through the storage area.
Some types of store will have aisles and shelving, others will have stands of clothes. All of these will or should have adequate space for customers to walk down to the exit.
If a dedicated escape route or a fire exit was blocked there would definitely be an issue, and many retailers have had huge fines levied on them.
Maybe the best test would be to stand in the store and see how long it takes you to walk to an exit. Ask is the exit clear and does it go to a place of safety. If you can answer yes to these questions, then surely the provision is OK.
Fire specialist feel free to correct me here.
Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
IanDakin wrote:Hi
I think there is perhaps a mis-understanding here. An escape route would be a protected corridor or stairway, or similar. A shop floor has many ways to the exit. |IN small units this would often be the front door or there may be an additional fire excape either off the floor or via a maglock out the back through the storage area.
Some types of store will have aisles and shelving, others will have stands of clothes. All of these will or should have adequate space for customers to walk down to the exit.
If a dedicated escape route or a fire exit was blocked there would definitely be an issue, and many retailers have had huge fines levied on them.
Maybe the best test would be to stand in the store and see how long it takes you to walk to an exit. Ask is the exit clear and does it go to a place of safety. If you can answer yes to these questions, then surely the provision is OK.
Fire specialist feel free to correct me here.
Ian 'When people start applying common sense the whole thing falls apart'
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
IanDakin wrote:Hi
Fire specialist feel free to correct me here.
Ian No need to be corrected - I think your spot on and answers the question to the OP.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
bob youel wrote:the truth is as PH2 said as there are very few enforcers out there these days so U can have as many laws as U want but with no enforcers how do U enforce your laws and businesses know the situation so do not bother?
and I do not believe that H&S bods outside their work environment have anymore a duty to report things than any other person on the street Always the problem with any legislation and I can see how profit driven businesses will take as many shortcuts as they can. WRT the duty to report, of course you're right. The idea of the H & S busybody(with no enforcement powers) with the notebook and the camera, checking up on the local shops is the stuff of sitcoms :-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
How can you tell a safety officer out shopping 'he's the one who walks to the furthest corner of the shop and then counts how far it is to the nearest exit'. If it is within the correct distance he shops if it is not he leaves and goes to a smaller shop and repeats the exercise.
I know shops do block final exit doors etc. But I do not believe that it is my role to go around pointing this out as said before we are not enforcement officers
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Single exits from shops are very common, especially in cities such as York where many of he buildings are medieval (in plan at least) and for some reason were constructed without regard to Building Regulations (they don't tend to have cabling for PCs either, medieval people were very short-sighted).
Charity shops have a particular problem with access and egress, as we get our stock through the front door at unpredictable times and in random (sometimes large) quantities. Donations can temporarily block access and egress. We can also have a problem with hoarders; shops managers should follow a strict stock rotation, and stuff that persistently won't sell gets ragged and carted away. Some managers would prefer to hang on to stuff. This problem does get sorted out, but while we are sorting it it can again lead to access and egress problems.
We tackle all this by putting enhanced fire prevention arrangements in place in shops with only one exit. Apart from moving out it's all we can do.
I agree with Ian, we shouldn't confuse fire exits with the ordinary means of entering or leaving a premises, especially in Retail. Where there's only one door, that has to be the 'fire exit' and it is sufficient given decent management of space and storage. After all, in a fire members of the public tend to leave by the door they came in by, no special provision is needed,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I cannot understand why so many argue against keeping fire escape rputes clear and pick out slight anomalies.
To me a fire escape route includes all doors along the route and including the first door at the back of the shop. That is the one usually seen to be obstructed but no one can see beyond that door so we do not know if the rest of the escape route is blocked.
If a fire risk assessment has been done the travel distances will have been estimated so no need for anyone to take a walk around the shop prior to shopping ha ha.
It is Environmental Health who are responsible for retail but they are thin on the ground. A call to the local fire station usually gets a fast response and a bollocking for the store.
I suppose some of our professionals are a little complacent here in deciding not to report blocked fire exits, I just hope you are not caught in a fire situation where the only fire exit is blocked, you knew about it, and decided to ignore.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
FS 101, don't misunderstand, we won't tolerate blocked doors, our problems are about keeping gangways clear. It's sometimes a struggle for us is all I'm saying,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
FireSafety101 wrote:I cannot understand why so many argue against keeping fire escape rputes clear and pick out slight anomalies.
To me a fire escape route includes all doors along the route and including the first door at the back of the shop. That is the one usually seen to be obstructed but no one can see beyond that door so we do not know if the rest of the escape route is blocked.
If a fire risk assessment has been done the travel distances will have been estimated so no need for anyone to take a walk around the shop prior to shopping ha ha.
It is Environmental Health who are responsible for retail but they are thin on the ground. A call to the local fire station usually gets a fast response and a bollocking for the store.
I suppose some of our professionals are a little complacent here in deciding not to report blocked fire exits, I just hope you are not caught in a fire situation where the only fire exit is blocked, you knew about it, and decided to ignore.
I am not complacent I do not see that every infringement is my role to raise with people, they do not pay for my expertise, they have there own safety people to do this. I would guess that there are not many firemen who would raise concerns when they are out shopping. I do not report every paving slab that would cause a trip hazard to the local council. I would not have a minute to myself. I don't think not reporting makes anyone else in my profession better than me!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Fire Safety 101 I would not argue about that. But there is a clear distinction between general retail floors and escape routes, the later being dedicated routes that must be kept clear and in addition have minimal combustible materials in them. If anyone wants to know about retail FRAs follow this link. https://www.gov.uk/gover...Offices_and_Shops_v2.pdfI think enforcement of the RRO is by the Fire and rescue Service not EHOs. Invictus - take care in my company's stores as you may encounter dog! Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
IanDakin wrote:Fire Safety 101 I would not argue about that. But there is a clear distinction between general retail floors and escape routes, the later being dedicated routes that must be kept clear and in addition have minimal combustible materials in them. If anyone wants to know about retail FRAs follow this link. https://www.gov.uk/gover...Offices_and_Shops_v2.pdfI think enforcement of the RRO is by the Fire and rescue Service not EHOs. Invictus - take care in my company's stores as you may encounter dog! Ian Look after some charity shops myself!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
FireSafety101 wrote:I cannot understand why so many argue against keeping fire escape rputes clear and pick out slight anomalies.
To me a fire escape route includes all doors along the route and including the first door at the back of the shop. That is the one usually seen to be obstructed but no one can see beyond that door so we do not know if the rest of the escape route is blocked.
If a fire risk assessment has been done the travel distances will have been estimated so no need for anyone to take a walk around the shop prior to shopping ha ha.
It is Environmental Health who are responsible for retail but they are thin on the ground. A call to the local fire station usually gets a fast response and a bollocking for the store.
I suppose some of our professionals are a little complacent here in deciding not to report blocked fire exits, I just hope you are not caught in a fire situation where the only fire exit is blocked, you knew about it, and decided to ignore.
Complacent? No. Unprofessional? No. Know what I can and can't do in terms of advising? Yes. Know that the RRO is enforced by Fire Service, not EHOs? Yes. You choose to take pictures and report, I don't. Others don't. It doesn't make us any less professional, thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
FireSafety101 wrote: It is Environmental Health who are responsible for retail but they are thin on the ground. A call to the local fire station usually gets a fast response and a bollocking for the store.
If the EHO are responsible why are you calling the FRS?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Environmental Health are responsible for health and safety in retail and that will cover fire as well, however FRS enforce the rrfso.
Whenever you call the fire safety officer you always get a quick response whereas EHOs are usually too busy to reapond quickly.
I hope that answers your question Toe.
By the way your post #19 suggests you are a little confused about MOE and escape routes.
A means of escape is provided to ensure safe egress from the premises or other locations to a place of total safety.
An escape route is a route forming that part of the means of escape from any point in the premises to a final exit.
Not the same but escape routes are a small part of a means of escape.
The way I see it a means of escape can contain a number of different escape routes all leading to the same place of total safety.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.