Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Animax01  
#1 Posted : 29 January 2016 12:11:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Animax01

Hi All, serious question time.... Sorry for doing this on a Friday. I have an employee that has been at the company for a few years and has had on and off back pain and problems, mainly related to age, wear and tear and previous job choices. She has now been diagnosed with spinal arthritis and the prognosis isn't good long term. She is currently working half days as part of a rehabilitation programme but this looks destined to fail if her condition is only going to deteriorate. She expects to be needing a walking stick in the near future as well as a series of operations to try and minimise the progression as well as the pain. 80% of her work is in areas that are safety critical, BA is required along with a suite of other PPE equipment. We work with some highly toxic materials, so I have reservations with her returning with poor mobility and aided with sticks and so forth. I have just spoken with the HR department and the production manager who think we need to dismiss her on both safety and capability grounds. I agree with there position, mainly because I do not think it is safe for her or others to have her in those environments. I am about to present my report to the MD and HR department regarding this and wondered if anyone had anything to say/add to this from experience. Whether or not this course of action is justifiable etc. I have had our occupation health assess her and the report stated much the same, limited capabilities, poor mobility and rehabilitate back to full time. I should also add that there are no part time hours available due to the nature of the work and the way that we operate. All comments will be greatly appreciated.
Invictus  
#2 Posted : 29 January 2016 12:28:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Can she not be moved to a separate department? If she is lone term can't a redundancy packege be put together?
Animax01  
#3 Posted : 29 January 2016 12:54:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Animax01

Hi Invictus, I'm afraid that all f our departments are much the same. The only difference would be putting her in the office, which I'm afraid she just doesn't have the experience or capabilities to perform. I'm all for reasonable adjustments but there is only so far we can go. There is a strong possibility that she will be struggling to get in and out of the bath at home, let alone come to work in the non to distant future. It's cruel, I don't enjoy sitting here typing this but it is what it is.
Invictus  
#4 Posted : 29 January 2016 13:00:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Sadly there is only so much you can do, unfortunately that's life. The problem is she won't have anything to get up for and therefore could deteriorate quite quickly.
firesafety101  
#5 Posted : 29 January 2016 13:44:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

That's a bit draconian isn't it. Good employee gets a disability and is on the scrap heap right away. I wouldn't want to work for your company. There will not be much if anything in the form of work opportunities for her. The present Benefit system will I am sure do their best to find her fit for work even if in a wheelchair. However if you let her go that will be it. As Invictus says nothing to get up for, deteriorate rapidly, followed by death. Caring company/society ????????
martin1  
#6 Posted : 29 January 2016 13:48:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
martin1

I think the company should do their best to find her a suitable role or make reasonable adjustments. Shame on them if they don't and they think of getting rid of her as first option.
paulw71  
#7 Posted : 29 January 2016 13:59:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paulw71

"She then wont have anything to get up for". Thats a bit presumptuous isnt it ? She may have lots to get up for. " She could then deteriorate rapidly and die". You two are just glass half full kinda guys arent you.
Invictus  
#8 Posted : 29 January 2016 14:04:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

paulw71 wrote:
"She then wont have anything to get up for". Thats a bit presumptuous isnt it ? She may have lots to get up for. " She could then deteriorate rapidly and die". You two are just glass half full kinda guys arent you.
Were all Doooomed!!!
firesafety101  
#9 Posted : 29 January 2016 14:12:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Hey, I've been living with disability for the past 14 years or so. I know what its like trying to keep someone motivated when they feel their world is ending because normal things aren't happening any longer. All businesses should look to employ disabled employees and to make reasonable adjustments. Are there any such policies in that company and are there disabled people employed already ? If there are then find a job for her. If there are no policies for for employing disabled people that I personally would take the employer to court on a disability discrimination claim. I did that once before, not to claim money but to have a school write some policies and procedures and train their staff. The Judge awarded against the school and they now have good policies and procedures and the disabled kids who attend the school are now better looked after. The law is on the side of the disabled employee.
Invictus  
#10 Posted : 29 January 2016 14:20:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

That poor women worked all her life, probably brought up 6 or 7 kids, husband abandoned her when they were all only young, showed loyalty to the company, gets arthritis, maybe because the company didn't look after her health and safety. Now I'm not sure if the company are getting shut because she is passed her sell by date or because she won't be able to bath soon. Now I'm not saying any of this is true but, something stinks here, it maybe her!
score  
#11 Posted : 29 January 2016 14:20:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
score

Have you considered bringing in access to work (DWP funded)? She would need to contact them initially they then would come in and make recommendations, if any specialized equipment is used they would pay 90% of the costs.
David Bannister  
#12 Posted : 29 January 2016 14:25:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

The employee may be delighted to be let go on health grounds and the company may be very generous in any settlement. Too many presumptions and assumptions here without facts.
Invictus  
#13 Posted : 29 January 2016 14:28:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

David Bannister wrote:
The employee may be delighted to be let go on health grounds and the company may be very generous in any settlement. Too many presumptions and assumptions here without facts.
I agree I think people just make stuff up on here. Sad very sad!
Graham Bullough  
#14 Posted : 29 January 2016 14:56:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Animax Following on from David B's point at #12, have you and/or anyone else spoken to the employee to discuss her situation and ascertain what her views are? Though you mention that occupational health (OH) have assessed her, the ensuing report might not have included any comments she made to OH. On a general note for forum users, it seems that quite a number of the threads posted on this forum about people with medical conditions or disabilities tend to generate considerable discussion but contain little or no indication that the subject individuals (i.e. persons not inanimate objects) have been asked for their views and perceptions! Graham B
Martin Gray  
#15 Posted : 29 January 2016 15:16:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Martin Gray

I was in a similar position with an employee who was suffering from motorneurone disease. I took advice from Access to Work and also an employment lawyer as the person was not capable of carrying out their role and we could not find a role suitable to their disability. The result was that the employee was dismissed due to medically be incapable of carrying out the role for which they were employed. Ensure all your actions, decisions and those of HR are documented and held in the individuals personal file. This was the advice from ATW and the Lawyer, as you need to show that you have taken all reasonable steps to redeploy the person. We were unable to find any stated case law but, if the person or their relative decide to take legal action under the Equality Act you will have all the evidence needed. Good luck.
biker1  
#16 Posted : 29 January 2016 15:58:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
biker1

FireSafety101 wrote:
The law is on the side of the disabled employee.
I only wish that were true. People with disabilities are 'protected' by the Equality Act. Unfortunately this, as was the case with the previous legislation (Disability Discrimination Act), is a toothless piece of legislation. No body is assigned to enforce the act, as would be the case with health and safety, fire safety, environmental health etc. It is therefore down to the individual to take action if they feel discriminated against, either at tribunal for employment, or county court for access to shops and services etc. Not surprisingly, I am not aware of any such cases for the latter, as people with disabilities tend to be somewhat disadvantaged anyway in terms of resources to take legal action. Tribunals for employment matters are more accessible, but then a big problem with the tribunal process is that it is not a level playing field with respects to representation. Someone taking a case there will probably have to represent themselves, whereas the employer can bring in the big guns, perhaps even a barrister. Until a body is appointed to police compliance with the Equality Act, the so called protection that people with disabilities have is on paper only.
firesafety101  
#17 Posted : 29 January 2016 16:17:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Biker 1 have a look at #9 above. I took on the LEA's barrister at the Family Court and won. There is no reason to fear lawyers in court if right is on your side.
Animax01  
#18 Posted : 29 January 2016 16:38:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Animax01

Thank you all for the varied and mixed responses, some very useful and some have responded to the evocative nature of the topic. If you read back you will notice that I mentioned that the job is safety critical, involves toxic chemicals and breathing apparatus. This is no environment for someone that requires a walking aid. I think the company is in fact looking out for her best interest when they say she shouldn't be in that environment. As for re-deployment, she isn't capable of becoming an accountant, a QA/QC manager, an HR manager or a Lab technician - so there really is very little scope to train her in another area. I have explored all of these avenues, trust me. She isn't particularly old, mid 50's and has been with us for about 3 years now. She used to work in a caring home and I'm going to guess that some of the lifting practices may have led to some of the problems she now suffers with. We have considered altering the workplace to suit her, but we are talking about re-designing the whole way of production and that could be hundreds of thousands of pounds, realistically that just won't happen. I appreciate all the comments, I will look into what else I can do, but I am seriously limited on that front.
johnmurray  
#19 Posted : 30 January 2016 11:50:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

It's at times like this that [union] people appreciate the legal assistance part of their membership.
Kate  
#20 Posted : 31 January 2016 15:09:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

Have you considered the feasibility of creating a role in the office that she could do, for example giving basic admin support to the roles you've mentioned that she can't be trained to do?
bob youel  
#21 Posted : 31 January 2016 15:54:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Remember to ensure that you include the person concerned all the way and that your report only addresses H&S areas and then hand it over to HR etc. with a recommendation that the person concerned sees it and then let others to do the rest otherwise H&S will be blamed yet again
Animax01  
#22 Posted : 01 February 2016 09:02:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Animax01

I will put forward the suggestion of creating an admin role, or a similar task that is appropriate. The individual has been included in all discussions up to this point. There has been complete honesty throughout, there is no point hiding anything. HR and I will be speaking this morning and trying to sort out an amicable solution that works for everyone involved. Ultimately, we do not want to lose an experienced worker, but we don't want to put her or others in harms way. Thanks again everyone, some really good advice here.
Invictus  
#23 Posted : 01 February 2016 09:09:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

she's only been there a few years get shut now, before it becomes difficult
James Robinson  
#24 Posted : 01 February 2016 15:43:01(UTC)
Rank:: Forum user
James Robinson

I think you are looking at this from the correct point of view, it is an emotional issue, but there are certain key responsibilities to both her and her colleagues. Having a Safety Critical role occupational health are entitled to state whether she can, or cannot continue in her present role. If the answer is that she cannot, then the options left are to redeploy elsewhere within the business to a suitable role if one exists for her capability with suitable adjustment, if not, come up with an plan for her to leave the business. There is not much that can be done for some people in the business they are in. However this still does not mean that things cannot be done without dignity, good communication and management. I hope the outcome for both her, and the business is agreeable.
watcher  
#25 Posted : 01 February 2016 16:16:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
watcher

James at #24 has covered it I think. If it is a safety critical role, with the requirements outlined, then it looks unlikely she can continue. Also admin jobs should not be seen as the "go to" for anyone who can no longer carry out duties on shop of production floors. it is a job in its own right, and it is unfair to her and other staff to move her to a post with a completely different skillset. The poor woman has my utmost sympathy, but adjustments have to be reasonable. And as a previous poster said, she might be happy to get medical retirement. I know it's an emotional subject, but we can only do our best
Melrose80086  
#26 Posted : 02 February 2016 13:09:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Melrose80086

I think exploring the idea of an office based role would probably be your best option. Yes she may need to retrain ...perhaps she could help with payroll (and learn on the job). What about a training role - providing toolbox talks to staff maybe? stock taking / ordering? I know you said there was little scope for an office based role but could one be created for her - even taking minutes at board meetings / answering calls? Is there a course that she could attend locally - you mention technician position - could she not shadow someone and attend day release at uni if given the option? I agree that her continuing in her current role would likely place her (and her work colleagues) at risk and ultimately she might decide that she'd rather leave the organisation but at least you'd have been able to demonstrate you'd considered all avenues.
Invictus  
#27 Posted : 02 February 2016 14:04:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Watcher wrote:
James at #24 has covered it I think. If it is a safety critical role, with the requirements outlined, then it looks unlikely she can continue. Also admin jobs should not be seen as the "go to" for anyone who can no longer carry out duties on shop of production floors. it is a job in its own right, and it is unfair to her and other staff to move her to a post with a completely different skillset. The poor woman has my utmost sympathy, but adjustments have to be reasonable. And as a previous poster said, she might be happy to get medical retirement. I know it's an emotional subject, but we can only do our best
Are admin jobs really jobs? I would love to be admin, sit all day drinking coffee and talking great stuff. I thought that office jobs were created to give people the opportunity to come back on light duties so that they could keep in touch. Have I got it wrong all these year? Anyway the old dear should be put out to pasture she probably won't be any good at admin and why invest money.
jodieclark1510  
#28 Posted : 02 February 2016 14:25:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jodieclark1510

Are admin jobs really jobs? I would love to be admin, sit all day drinking coffee and talking great stuff. I thought that office jobs were created to give people the opportunity to come back on light duties so that they could keep in touch. Have I got it wrong all these year? Anyway the old dear should be put out to pasture she probably won't be any good at admin and why invest money.
Ouch.....Been admin and a PA, do a lot of admin work now- and learning a lot from it all the time- the work itself may not be technical but the information you are dealing with covers a multitude of things which you need to be privvy to, to some extent to keep everything in order- admin is quite a disciplined role. How many times do things fall apart because the admin is shot to pieces?!
Invictus  
#29 Posted : 02 February 2016 14:35:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Well I have a blister on the one finger I use to type, i'm sure this is RIDDOR reportable hopefully someone on here can let me know. Seriously learning something everyday in admin, what to count to two because that's the number of sugars the manager has! How much the milk is! or is it plain or chocolate biscuits for the meeting.
jodieclark1510  
#30 Posted : 02 February 2016 15:33:04(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jodieclark1510

I type up survey registers- I'm not an asbestos expert- I'm learning- that's admin. I write up fire risk assessments once I have been on site- that's admin too. I've written up schedules of work and raise work orders- you'll never guess what that is?! I apologise if it is beneath some people to undertake such silly work such as admin- but some of us sadly are not at the top of the tree in their careers for whatever reason and are taking things one step at a time. It's not for everyone- fair enough- but neither is health and safety, or being a vet, or a bricklayer. Attitudes like that- turning your nose up at people and making assumptions across the board because of what they do is pompous- people moan on here about how health and safety is given such bad press, but are quick enough to dish it out to others?!
Invictus  
#31 Posted : 02 February 2016 15:35:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Jodie, Have you ever heard the term! Hook, Line and sinker! I knew someone would bite. 'Gone fishing';)
jodieclark1510  
#32 Posted : 02 February 2016 15:55:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jodieclark1510

I have and in all honesty I'm not fussed because you may say it as a joke but I can guarantee there are others agreeing wholly with what you said in jest. I can't tolerate those looking down from others on high because of a job title.
paulw71  
#33 Posted : 02 February 2016 16:18:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paulw71

jodieclark1510 wrote:
I have and in all honesty I'm not fussed because you may say it as a joke but I can guarantee there are others agreeing wholly with what you said in jest. I can't tolerate those looking down from others on high because of a job title.
Like pilots ?
jodieclark1510  
#34 Posted : 02 February 2016 16:52:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jodieclark1510

paulw71 wrote:
jodieclark1510 wrote:
I have and in all honesty I'm not fussed because you may say it as a joke but I can guarantee there are others agreeing wholly with what you said in jest. I can't tolerate those looking down from others on high because of a job title.
Like pilots ?
Thank you paulw1 :-)
Animax01  
#35 Posted : 03 February 2016 09:12:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Animax01

That escalated quickly! In fairness, as I know the woman in concern I would be surprised if she was able to fulfil an admin role. I do not believe she has the mental flexibility to do so. Although her current role has the potential to be quite dangerous, it is set out in a straight forward manner. I have really tried to be honest and open in my report that I submitted and I have based it solely on H&S concerns. It is up to the HR and the Production management to decide what alternatives there are within the company. I have to much else on my plate to start doing the HR job too! Hope everyone is having a good start to the day :-)
walker  
#36 Posted : 03 February 2016 10:04:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Animax01 wrote:
Hope everyone is having a good start to the day :-)
Not really, have a big pile of admin to do.
paulw71  
#37 Posted : 03 February 2016 10:19:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paulw71

walker wrote:
Animax01 wrote:
Hope everyone is having a good start to the day :-)
Not really, have a big pile of admin to do.
Yea, and these plants arent going to water themselves.
ptaylor14  
#38 Posted : 03 February 2016 10:52:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ptaylor14

biker1 wrote:
FireSafety101 wrote:
The law is on the side of the disabled employee.
I only wish that were true. People with disabilities are 'protected' by the Equality Act. Unfortunately this, as was the case with the previous legislation (Disability Discrimination Act), is a toothless piece of legislation. No body is assigned to enforce the act, as would be the case with health and safety, fire safety, environmental health etc. It is therefore down to the individual to take action if they feel discriminated against, either at tribunal for employment, or county court for access to shops and services etc. Not surprisingly, I am not aware of any such cases for the latter, as people with disabilities tend to be somewhat disadvantaged anyway in terms of resources to take legal action. Tribunals for employment matters are more accessible, but then a big problem with the tribunal process is that it is not a level playing field with respects to representation. Someone taking a case there will probably have to represent themselves, whereas the employer can bring in the big guns, perhaps even a barrister. Until a body is appointed to police compliance with the Equality Act, the so called protection that people with disabilities have is on paper only.
How I wish there was a like button!!!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.