Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Robert H  
#1 Posted : 11 February 2016 19:03:01(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Robert H

A friend of mine has been given some new responsibilities, including health & safety and safeguarding, as part of her charity work. This involves looking into policies and guidelines for the charity. So does anyone have any good examples of any H&S policies that charities with a large number of volunteers (80+) have adopted as good working practice please? Also any possible links to relevant documents for her to benchmark would be appreciated. Thanks for any help in advance. Rob
stevie40  
#2 Posted : 11 February 2016 21:19:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

Some basic info here from Ecclesiastical - a large charity insurer. http://www.ecclesiastica...s%20guidance%20notes.pdf and http://www.ecclesiastica...gement-advice/index.aspx The Churches’ Child Protection Advisory Service CCPAS is also a good source of free information. Small Charities Coalition - http://www.smallcharitie...urces-commission-guides/ - again free advice. There is also the D of E site, Charity Commission and the NSPCC. I know you don't mention children but the principles are the same for vulnerable adults.
bob youel  
#3 Posted : 12 February 2016 07:58:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

I advise that a professional H&S bod is brought on board until these areas are underway noting that as charities are quite happy to pay their lawyer, solicitor, window cleaner and milk man etc. etc. they should be happy to pay another professional for such an important area best of luck
Robert H  
#4 Posted : 12 February 2016 14:01:48(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Robert H

Thanks Stevie. I am sure the links will be of help. Bob - sounds like sensible advice, I will find out a bit more detail. Any other safeguarding information out there would still be welcome though!
Mr Curious  
#5 Posted : 12 February 2016 14:34:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Mr Curious

Robert, my degree thesis for my MSc on HSE was a H&S assessment of a charity organisation, main offices and shops. Among the several resources I used, there was a book that included all relevant Legislation to charity organisations. Of course, as you can understand this varies, however, I believe that something like this will be of great value for you and the organisation. Not having a policy sounds to me that you have nothing or you want to go towards an accreditation. Might want to start from there. I'm at work right now but I can send you the title of the book once I head back home. Cheers.
toe  
#6 Posted : 12 February 2016 19:19:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

The University of Liverpool have published a book called Physical Intervention and the Law, Professor Christina M Lyon and Alexandra Pimar. This book will be helpful when developing your safeguarding policy.
bob youel  
#7 Posted : 14 February 2016 08:13:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

explain more about your charity and its reasons for having safe guarding
boblewis  
#8 Posted : 14 February 2016 15:35:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Bob I rather think the Safeguarding is to do with issues of abuse and vulnerability rather than H&S. It can be an absolute minefield.We should not forget that even professional social workers are working in this area and are making mistakes resulting some time in fatalities which hit the press big time. Unless your friend is really familiar in this area then s/he would do well to contact some of the local diocesan Safeguarding Officers.
aud  
#9 Posted : 14 February 2016 16:18:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
aud

Safeguarding is regulated mainly by the Childrens Act 2006. H&S is regulated by HSAWA etc. Safeguarding covers aspects such as radicalisation, grooming, internet safety, as well as domestic abuse or neglect. Most of the 'risk' is external to the organisation apart from the staffing aspect. It is outside the remit of H&S practitioners, although some awareness may be helpful.
toe  
#10 Posted : 14 February 2016 16:22:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

boblewis wrote:
Bob I rather think the Safeguarding is to do with issues of abuse and vulnerability rather than H&S. It can be an absolute minefield..
Safeguarding should not be a minefield (not disagreeing) it should be very simple. If society cannot simply protect people and keep them safe then we have a problem. For the OP. Take a look at the Winterbourne View Report and the recommendations from it. Most importantly is corporate governance and whistleblowing policies.
toe  
#11 Posted : 14 February 2016 16:34:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

aud wrote:
Safeguarding is regulated mainly by the Childrens Act 2006. H&S is regulated by HSAWA etc. It is outside the remit of H&S practitioners, although some awareness may be helpful.
Safeguarding also comes under the Adult Support and Protection Act and not just Children. Also if a person was convicted it would no be under these pieces of legislation as it would be either be linked to assault or abuse and other criminal laws. Safeguarding must be managed with a multidisciplinary approach, in which H&S forms a critical part. In organisations that manage these risks the H&S practitioner would take the lead in setting the standards and policies. NOTE: section 3 of H&SAWA applies.
aud  
#12 Posted : 14 February 2016 16:46:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
aud

Toe. Take your point about adults, could have extended the response, but then I would have had to look up the regulatory framework, and I knew the Childrens Act. However, disagree that safeguarding 'belongs' to H&S. Knowing what I do know about safeguarding risks it's hard to see much of a connection. In education authorities there will likely be a safeguarding team. But not connected to the H&S advisory team. Organisations can chose who deals with what, of course, see the thread at the moment on "why is quality part of H&S?". I say it is a wholly different specialty, not H&S, and would only get involved on the periphery. But then I would say that about quality management too.
boblewis  
#13 Posted : 14 February 2016 19:47:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Toe The hard truth is that safeguarding cannot protect people fully and in fact cannot identify offenders until they have offended by which time somebody has been abused. As is the case with other criminals one cannot identify say a thief before they have stolen. In essence this is why safeguarding is actually a very difficult issue and even now a picture of multiple events has to be constructed before the standard of criminal proof is reached. Below this threshold it is all one word against another. Yes the legislation does allow recording of suspicions but once somebody is employed the standard of proof before dismissal rises to that of beyond reasonable doubt.
toe  
#14 Posted : 14 February 2016 20:51:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

Bob This is often true in society. However, when organisations are responsible for care of vulnerable people safeguarding is of paramount importance. If you read the 'winterbourne report' there were various warnings of the abuse taking place, even the regulator (Care Quality Commission) received warning but never acted. The abuse was so well known at the Hospital that it took an investigative TV broadcast to expose it. There are many provisions an organisations can be put into place to ensure that safeguarding takes place. Aud Your right, education departments and councils do have people responsible for safeguarding (part of the law) which widely applies to children. However, once a person becomes an adult the law changes. Private organisations do-not always have dedicated people managing this and often the lead comes from the H&S function within these organisations. I'm not saying that safeguarding 'belongs' to H&S, as I have stated, it must be multidisciplinary, where all parties who are involved in the care of the person gets involved in which H&S forms a big part of this function. If organisations are responsible for the care of 'people other than their employees' and this doesn't belong to the H&S function, then which function would it belong to? "The health and safety of people who use care services is covered by the general requirements of Section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Etc Act 1974, (HSWA s.3)" Extract from the HSE website see link below. http://www.hse.gov.uk/fo...sims/pub_serv/071101.htm
Invictus  
#15 Posted : 15 February 2016 08:14:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Toe wrote:
aud wrote:
Safeguarding is regulated mainly by the Childrens Act 2006. H&S is regulated by HSAWA etc. It is outside the remit of H&S practitioners, although some awareness may be helpful.
Safeguarding also comes under the Adult Support and Protection Act and not just Children. Also if a person was convicted it would no be under these pieces of legislation as it would be either be linked to assault or abuse and other criminal laws. Safeguarding must be managed with a multidisciplinary approach, in which H&S forms a critical part. In organisations that manage these risks the H&S practitioner would take the lead in setting the standards and policies. NOTE: section 3 of H&SAWA applies.
Toe, agree somewhat to what you are saying and a multi disiplinary approach is the best way forward. However I do not agree that it should be H&S led, there are a number of bodies before they even get in that should deal with this matter and once they are in then it becomes a HR issue and maybe even a court issue. I worked for a charity and there is no risk assessment, policy or procedure that will stop these people, it is like any risk assessment will will have those who will comply but you will always have the one who won't. The people who want to abuese are devious and used to be called NONCE's. If they have slipped through the net or have never been caught unfortunately you have to ensure that other employees are well aware of the procedures to take if they suspect ot they have a compliant made otr they slip up. Hard but in my opinion that's the way it is.
stevie40  
#16 Posted : 15 February 2016 10:47:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

Safeguarding should be a multi-discipline activity with input from HR (recruitment and screening), senior management (policies and aims) and H&S. The H&S involvement is very real. The threat of being sued / investigated for physical abuse is very real and very emotive. Staff become almost paralysed by this fear of what they can and cannot do and it can lead to them becoming victims of assault. Violence against staff members is a H&S issue and suitable training and policies needs to be put in place to allow staff to confidently deal with such incidents, confident that they are not crossing a line and commit physical abuse. There are many recognised courses out there, the ones I recall are Team Teach, Proact Scipr and Breakaway.
Invictus  
#17 Posted : 15 February 2016 11:34:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

quote=stevie40]Safeguarding should be a multi-discipline activity with input from HR (recruitment and screening), senior management (policies and aims) and H&S. The H&S involvement is very real. The threat of being sued / investigated for physical abuse is very real and very emotive. Staff become almost paralysed by this fear of what they can and cannot do and it can lead to them becoming victims of assault. Violence against staff members is a H&S issue and suitable training and policies needs to be put in place to allow staff to confidently deal with such incidents, confident that they are not crossing a line and commit physical abuse. There are many recognised courses out there, the ones I recall are Team Teach, Proact Scipr and Breakaway.
We use recognised training for all our staff and refresh at the correct intervals, they have paperwork that must be completed even as required to say why hands on was required as this is always the last resort, we also have training which is diffr=erent for dealing with violent elderly service users. The problem is with working in the care system is that you never know who and why someone is going to make an allegation against you and as been proved historical cases are coming more and more so if you have worked in the care system a allegation can be made at any time innocent or not you will still go through the same turmoil. We have quite a robust procedure in place with a counselling service etc. but no amount of R/A's policy, procedures will counteract an allegation.
stevie40  
#18 Posted : 15 February 2016 12:03:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

Invictus - it can also be a political minefield. Used to work for a charity insurer so was privy to some of the multi-agency investigation reports into allegations. Saw at least two cases where settings were closed on allegations that later turned out to be false. Closure instigated by the LA child services team for fear of having control taken over by Westminster if they were not seen to act. The rammifications at a personal level for the service users (high dependancy 24/7 care for children) were horrific and I remember breaking down during that meeting. Glad to be back in general industry insurance now.
Invictus  
#19 Posted : 15 February 2016 12:17:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

quote=stevie40]Invictus - it can also be a political minefield. Used to work for a charity insurer so was privy to some of the multi-agency investigation reports into allegations. Saw at least two cases where settings were closed on allegations that later turned out to be false. Closure instigated by the LA child services team for fear of having control taken over by Westminster if they were not seen to act. The ramifications at a personal level for the service users (high dependancy 24/7 care for children) were horrific and I remember breaking down during that meeting. Glad to be back in general industry insurance now.
Would disagree with I think the rammifications of anyone caught up in allegations with the exception of those who know they are guilty and in normal circumstances will plead guilty after a while. It is the effect that it takes on the innocent person and their family's often they can only see their own children with supervision and may be required to move out of the family home whilst the investigation takes place. I found that not being able to contact colleagues was always one of the worse effects, they felt that they were in total isolation and had know one who understood what they were going through to talk to. The person is suspended sometimes for over 18 months and then is expected to come back to work often with the young person who made that allegation and feel no resentment and get on with the job. I do empathise with young people who have been abused but until we start offering allernative to cash sums i.e. counselling etc. this will benefit the people and will reduce supurious claims.
stevie40  
#20 Posted : 15 February 2016 12:27:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

sent you a PM Invictus.
bob youel  
#21 Posted : 15 February 2016 13:32:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

R still waiting for the answer as to why safeguarding? is it something needed, something nice to have etc. etc. as answers will need to be taylored to your circumstances I did tonnes of safeguarding things before retirement so was up to date but the background to the Q is still needed so as correct answers can be given
toe  
#22 Posted : 15 February 2016 19:54:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
toe

There appears to be some confusion here, and I would like to put my comments into context. I work for an organisation that provides care services for the most vulnerable people in our society. This is why we have to ensure that we manage safeguarding risks to keep these people safe. So my comments are aimed at organisation who require to safeguard people (ASP and RTF in Scotland). It is not clear from the OP if they hold a similar responsibility. But.... I guess that some of the comments made here are appropriate for general organisations but not for care providers or child services that is their primary responsible for ensuring that vulnerable people are kept safe from harm. In which I admit can be difficult but also most of which can be prevented.
Invictus  
#23 Posted : 16 February 2016 08:29:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Toe wrote:
There appears to be some confusion here, and I would like to put my comments into context. I work for an organisation that provides care services for the most vulnerable people in our society. This is why we have to ensure that we manage safeguarding risks to keep these people safe. So my comments are aimed at organisation who require to safeguard people (ASP and RTF in Scotland). It is not clear from the OP if they hold a similar responsibility. But.... I guess that some of the comments made here are appropriate for general organisations but not for care providers or child services that is their primary responsible for ensuring that vulnerable people are kept safe from harm. In which I admit can be difficult but also most of which can be prevented.
Most of 'which and not all, can be prevented' I have spent over 35 years working in childrens homes, residential schools, secure units, elderly services, prisons (H&S Manager in the prison). It always has to be a multi disiplinary approach, but too often people try to move the whole thing onto the shoulders of H&S and quite often these are the people that are 'non-operational' or have the least hands on. The biggest input should be those working on the coal face, there is enough training, legislation, guidence documents, checks on potential employees to enable this, but often people are dragged into the customs and practice of the establishment, be it bad or good. I have seen prison officers on the 9 week training who leave fully equiped only to be told we don't do it that way, that's training and not real life. Without good leaders the system will always be doomed to fail. This shows by the fact that children are still being abused (alleged) in the care system. Murdered at home.
Robert H  
#24 Posted : 16 February 2016 13:54:40(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Robert H

Thank you all for all your responses. Just catching up so apologies for the delay in responding further until now. Having spoken to my friend, the Charity already has H&S policies and procedures in place, along with a policy for 'safeguarding'. The Charity offers support for disabled adults who are abused or victimised in some way and as safeguarding appears to change so rapidly, she just wanted to know if there was any best practice out there for her to benchmark the current policy against. For example, under the 'prevent duty' I believe there should be a section/paragraph on'radicalisation and extremism'. Also, according to the 'star standard' for charities, the new terminology is "adults at risk" rather than "vulnerable adults". Ideally therefore, it would be really useful to have copies of any up-to-date policies to see how these aspects have been included. Her role is mainly in HR but the 'safeguarding' aspect appears to be getting an increasing link to H&S (even though I agree a multi-disciplinary approach probably works best) and so she just wanted to know if I had any access to such policies, via my H&S background. Hope that helps provide some background to the situation. Thanks again to all. Rob I accept that a
Invictus  
#25 Posted : 16 February 2016 14:05:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Robert H wrote:
Thank you all for all your responses. Just catching up so apologies for the delay in responding further until now. Having spoken to my friend, the Charity already has H&S policies and procedures in place, along with a policy for 'safeguarding'. The Charity offers support for disabled adults who are abused or victimised in some way and as safeguarding appears to change so rapidly, she just wanted to know if there was any best practice out there for her to benchmark the current policy against. For example, under the 'prevent duty' I believe there should be a section/paragraph on'radicalisation and extremism'. Also, according to the 'star standard' for charities, the new terminology is "adults at risk" rather than "vulnerable adults". Ideally therefore, it would be really useful to have copies of any up-to-date policies to see how these aspects have been included. Her role is mainly in HR but the 'safeguarding' aspect appears to be getting an increasing link to H&S (even though I agree a multi-disciplinary approach probably works best) and so she just wanted to know if I had any access to such policies, via my H&S background. Hope that helps provide some background to the situation. Thanks again to all. Rob I accept that a
You have to cover all subjects now especially during the training of staff that includes, on'radicalisation and extremism' and also Female Genital Mutilation. So safeguarding is not just about abuse, bullying etc, it covers a wide range of subjects. You can get information from OFSTED for young people and CQC for adults.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.