Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
NicoleJ15  
#1 Posted : 10 March 2016 13:30:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NicoleJ15

Hi,

We are trying to replace one of our fire assembly point signs which has been damaged due to the weather however the signs company that we use are recommending that we must now have pictorial signs and completely change all of existing ones. Currently we have a point number and wording stating 'fire assembly point' with no pictures.
The question I am asking is that have the regulations changed? Do they now state pictorial signs must be used and not just numbers and wording?
many thanks
Ian Bell2  
#2 Posted : 10 March 2016 15:15:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

BS5499-3:2013 gives guidance on fire escape signs.

The 2000 version says:

Every escape route sign should incorporate, or be accompanied by, a supplementary text sign conforming to BS 5499-1. The supplementary text will help to ensure that the meaning of the graphical symbol is fully understood and may convey additional information.

The law hasn't changed, but its normal practice to follow British Standards.

However depending on the cost of upgrading your safety signs, I'm sure you have better things to spend the money on?

Sounds like the usual sign/fire equipment company trying to increase their sales.
Jimothy999  
#3 Posted : 10 March 2016 16:22:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jimothy999

Agree with Ian Bell, sounds like fishing for business to me.

Do you have any indications from your fire drills that the signs are ineffective? If not then there is little need to go upgrading as the existing signs are presumably fit for purpose.
SNS  
#4 Posted : 10 March 2016 23:16:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SNS

Just to throw a small spanner in, the standard has been updated, have a look at: http://www.ifsecglobal.c...guide-to-bs-en-iso-7010/
However, the thrust of replies so far is about right.

If your signage is consistent across the site and it was to 5499 before the euro signage came in it should still (now) be ok. The only other consideration is indicated above when referring to the Fire Risk assessment.

Signs 'should' be pictograms, backed up by text if needed. If you have multiple languages on site the use of those languages on signage should be considered.
NicoleJ15  
#5 Posted : 11 March 2016 08:23:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NicoleJ15

Thanks all.

The signs are working fine as we test the evacuation process regularly and all goes smoothly. It was the sign company that threw me and no matter what I looked up I couldn't find anything that stated I had to change them all to pictorial. I was checking that I hadn't missed anything
Invictus  
#6 Posted : 11 March 2016 08:25:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

NicoleJ15 wrote:
Thanks all.

The signs are working fine as we test the evacuation process regularly and all goes smoothly. It was the sign company that threw me and no matter what I looked up I couldn't find anything that stated I had to change them all to pictorial. I was checking that I hadn't missed anything



Are the signs working fine or is it that you practice and people just know where to go. What about visitors and particularly the visitors who cannot read english.
NicoleJ15  
#7 Posted : 11 March 2016 08:49:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NicoleJ15

That's a valid point. We do have a very tight incident control procedure and security are very vigilant with external drivers and getting them to the correct points, however we have a 6th warehouse currently being built so we may possibly change all 6 sites to pictorial signage just to ensure we have all areas of the standard covered to be on the safe side.
grim72  
#8 Posted : 11 March 2016 09:31:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
grim72

Sounds like they are trying to update the signs in line with using the ISO7010 pictoral symbol. In theory it is best practice to use this symbol due to its high level of comprehension but certainly no legal requirement to do so and wouldn't suggest replacing existing signs unless there is a need to do so.
David Bannister  
#9 Posted : 11 March 2016 09:47:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

Whilst it may be desirable to upgrade assembly point signs, their importance to me comes very low down on the scale. After all, the primary purpose of the fire management plan is to ensure life safety and everything else prior to reaching the assembly point is in good working order you will have achieved the primary objective.

Yes it would be undesirable to have people wandering aimlessly but the fire marshals should be well able to direct them to the assembly points.
jay  
#10 Posted : 11 March 2016 11:14:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

The relevant legislation is :-
The Health and Safety (Safety Signs and Signals) Regulations 1996
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/l64.pdf


Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005

As mentioned by others, it is the Standards can change and have changed. That does not make all signs compliant with any old standard "Illegal"
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.