Rank: Super forum user
|
Can those with an NVQ or Tech Iosh grade rightly call themselves "professionals" and or "practitioners".
Where has this nonsense come from?
Jon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sadly there are people who believe that! But ill save that argument for another day. Yippeeeeee it's friday no more safety to worry about caution to the wind, might see you Monday.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
John M wrote:Can those with an NVQ or Tech Iosh grade rightly call themselves "professionals" and or "practitioners".
Where has this nonsense come from?
Jon Comes from here https://www.nebosh.org.uk/qualifications/in that NEBOSH’s Certificate-level qualifications provide an excellent foundation in health and safety for managers, supervisors and people starting out on a career in health and safety. NEBOSH’s Diplomas are professional qualifications for health, safety and environmental practitioners. and You might like also to research the outcome of the Sainsbury case where the judge stated that they did not have competent H&S advice. The advisor had the cert but the judge said the site risks were beyond her competence - and that was just a warehouse. Sainsbury case, they were fine nearly half a million pounds This is what IOSH CEO said about it in 1999: IOSH chief executive, John Barrell explained: 'This was a unit which employed around 700 people and which was using 46 reach trucks at the time of the accident, but the person appointed possessed only a National Examination Board in Occupational Health and Safety (NEBOSH) Certificate - a qualification which provides an adequate base for people with only a part-time responsibility for health and safety.' IOSH does not recognise the NEBOSH Certificate as sufficient qualification for people employed in a primary health and safety role, and no longer offers associate membership to the institution to those holding the certificate. A new membership grade - Technician Safety Practitioner (TechSP) was introduced last year which places more emphasis on experience. So reading into this a cert holder is NOT classed as a professional, taking into account what IOSH,NEBOSH and the result of the case say
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanks for this information- rather confirms my belief that there is a serious issue here with punters calling themselves "professionals" and "practitioners" when what they offer or produce is of little significance or benefit in the real world.
I laughed out loud when I read about this safety game being humorously classified as a "calling". This beats a recent sighting of safety bod on my site sporting an IOSH tie. Sad but true. He removed it before attending the weekly meeting of 16 others.
Jon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
John M , I cant decide if you are deliberately trying to wind people up or believe what you say.As a very recent TechIOSH level member I take great exception to some of your assertions. I work in a full time H/S role which I gained on the back of a general cert. This GC was achieved after years working on a top tier COMAH site where I was involved in H/S asa Union appointed safety rep , Supervisor and Manager my company funded the GC . I then left and took on this role as a person highly experienced in the nuts and bolts of health and safety with TechIOSH membership status.I have made many improvements in my company not through having a diploma but my long practical experience with extra knowledge from union safety training , in house and the Nebosh cert.To say I offered little benefit or experience with my GC is an insult and shows breathtakong arrogance and/or stupidity on your part and is disrepectful to the many very knowledgeable GC holders out there.You should be ashamed !!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
10 mark
In reply , no I am not trying to wind people up as you suggest. Nor do i have any issue with those with Nebosh certificates or other qualifications. Almost everyone has a level 3 certificate reflecting their respective training, hair dressers, cooks, cleaners, riggers, plant operators, nebosh certs etc or equivalent. The list is endless.
My issue is how the bearers of safety qualifications present themselves as superior beings and full of their own importance. Not all of course and this level of perceived superiority is equally evident with those holding higher safety qualifications.
I never suggested or implied that you in general or in person offered no benefit or experience. Perhaps it is your haste to jump to a wrong conclusion shows a degree of arrogance.
I have no need to be ashamed of my penning old chap - all based on my observations and exposure to the types I've had to manage or work with over the past 15 years or so.
Jon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
"Can those with an NVQ or Tech Iosh grade rightly call themselves "professionals" and or "practitioners".
Where has this nonsense come from?
Jon"
A very generalised statement encompassing all NVQ holders and Tech Iosh grades, I think you should re-read your posts!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
10 Mark
Statements? Certainly not. I asked questions. End of matter. Jon
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Many TechIOSH like myself gained that status through having NGC and having a science degree. Qualified professional.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The NEBOSH Diploma is a Professional qualification what ever that means (from the NEBOSH website).
I have the Diploma and I also have the Certificate. I have had my current job for 10 years, for the first 5 years of the job I only had the certificate. My employee paid for me to take the Diploma 5 years into my role.
I still do the same job, and to be honest I did just as good a job and was pretty much just as knowledgeably in regards to general safety when I only had the cert.
The only difference the Diploma made to me really was to give me a bit more self confidence.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Stonecold ,like you I started my present role with just the GC M,my employers also funded me through the Fire and Environmental certs.Unlike you my employers did not fund the diploma which I did myself I'm proud now to be GradIOSH working towards Chartered status but still shake my head when people assert you can only be a practitioner with at least diploma level qualifications .GC with no experience then I would agree.GC and years of experience in practical H/S I would disagree. I work with people who are not diploma qualified but are very competent indeed !!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Practitioner - a person actively engaged in an art, discipline or profession.
Practitioner - someone involved in a skilled job or activity.
Only Wikipedia promotes the concept of qualification.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Practitioner - a person actively engaged in an art, discipline or profession.
Practitioner - someone involved in a skilled job or activity.
Only Wikipedia promotes the concept of qualification.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
From David Bannister at #31: "The Cleese, Barker & Corbett sketch was first aired well before our profession was invented and was a reflection of societal attitudes which still exist to some extent today.
Of course as a Consultant with vast experience I look down on you all."
Those of us who are physically tall naturally look down on most other people - never mind their qualifications, experience or roles!
The fact that John Cleese was notably taller than Ronnie Barker and both were taller than Ronnie Corbett helped to enhance the aforementioned TV sketch. I remember seeing the first broadcast of it on "The Frost Report" but couldn't recall which year. A quick internet search reveals that it was in April 1966 - almost exactly 50 years ago. Hope this mildly interesting snippet of information provides some fleeting respite from the main cut and thrust of this thread! :-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
John M wrote:Can those with an NVQ or Tech Iosh grade rightly call themselves "professionals" and or "practitioners".
Where has this nonsense come from?
Jon Complete and utter rubbish!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
John M wrote:Can those with an NVQ or Tech Iosh grade rightly call themselves "professionals" and or "practitioners".
Where has this nonsense come from?
Jon 1) Yes. and 2) What makes you think this is nonsense? 'Professional' and 'Practitioner' are very broad descriptions and open to interpretation, of course people with NVQs and Tech IOSH can call themselves these things if they like and rightly so. 'Competence' is a much more loaded and meaningful term, and this is the test that really needs to be satisfied and depends on the situation.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There is some rubbish written here, the high and mighty Diploma gang, some people wouldn't know professionalism if it kicked them in the face.
So if I hold a diploma but don't want to join IOSH then I am not a professional. It doesn't bother me what level people have achieved because even those who have CMIOSH aren't always competent and I've met few.
Infact I am not so sure anyone needs a qualification to do H&S the ability to read and interpret what is written is all that is required.
You can go and complete the diploma without any experience and then get the experience as you go along.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
John M wrote:10 Mark
Statements? Certainly not. I asked questions. End of matter. Jon Oh please, are you now trying to make us believe you didn't intend to incite this reaction based on your prejudices? The OP already did this, and quite frankly I am disappointed that we on this forum cannot resist rising to it. There are more interesting posts which offer the opportunity discussion on real H&S issues rather than this tired old drivel about who's got the biggest or best certificate on their Cv.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
WatsonD wrote:John M wrote:10 Mark
Statements? Certainly not. I asked questions. End of matter. Jon Oh please, are you now trying to make us believe you didn't intend to incite this reaction based on your prejudices? The OP already did this, and quite frankly I am disappointed that we on this forum cannot resist rising to it. There are more interesting posts which offer the opportunity discussion on real H&S issues rather than this tired old drivel about who's got the biggest or best certificate on their Cv. So why respond!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Same reason you just did.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Invictus -
"There is some rubbish written here, the high and mighty Diploma gang, some people wouldn't know professionalism if it kicked them in the face."
Having joined this gang in February after much hard work combined with years of practical experience I don't feel high and mighty, if you read my posts we have the same view other than I am in any way high and mighty :-)
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.