Recently started work for a construction company. I believe the company should have all operatives tested for noise, vibration, lung function & skin surveillance. Not only does this give the company 'fit to work' certification but it ensures compliance etc. At present, this isn't in place and I want to advise my directors accordingly about the potential repercussions in the long term (claims etc). I've been checking on HSE website for clarification but any advice would be appreciated.

Many thanks WatsonD! Yes, this is the HSE page I've been researching and according to the flowchart, 3rd box down which mentions exposure levels to noise, vibration etc - it recommends health surveillance should be undertaken. I'm currently waiting for quotes for these from a couple of relevant companies. Thanks again

Again haven't read it in full yet as I only came accross it the other day but this looks like quite a good document http://www.cbhscheme.com...-For-Task-Standards.aspx

Consider the guidance in the sixth edition of COSHH. Paragraph 237, in particular, indicates where skin health surveillance is required. Examples where health surveillance is appropriate under the criteria in regulation 11(2)(b) are: - where there have been previous cases of work-related ill health in the workforce/place; - where there is reliance on PPE, eg gloves or respirators, as an exposure control measure; eg printers wearing gloves to protect against solvents used during press cleaning, or paint sprayers using two-pack paints wearing respirators to prevent asthma. Even with the closest supervision there is no guarantee that PPE will be effective at all times; - where there is evidence of ill health in jobs within the industry; eg frequent or prolonged contact with water (termed ‘wet-working’) causing dermatitis in hairdressers and healthcare workers, or breathing in mists from chrome plating baths causing chrome ulcers in platers. Paragraph 238 amplifies this: This is not a definitive or exhaustive list and there will be many other instances where health surveillance is required. Employers will need to seek information or advice on the specific health risks identified in the risk assessment, or through any topic-specific HSE guidance, trade associations or other professional sources. Note the last part of paragraph 237 which implies that even though you have never had any cases oc occupational ill health if others in the same industrial sector have you need ot have health surveillance in place. Chris

On a similar note, operatives working in a timber manufacturing environment (noise, dust). Health surveillance has been identified as a requirement. However my Boss would like to know if annual testing (lung function and audiometry) is required or can this be pushed out to a test every 3 years?

All the foregoing is heavily reliant on the employer having an established permanent workforce. Unfortunately the construction industry tends more and more not to operate that way. Much talk in the industry about trades and operatives being 'safe' via transferable VQ and card schemes, etc. Not so much on them being fit and healthy though.