Rank: Forum user
|
Hi, there is currently some discussion within our company on whether some rotating drive shafts should have guards over them or not. The drive shafts are purely the drive shaft ends (rotating shafts themselves are completely within the machinery) that are round, smooth and rotate freely and do not emerge more then 10cm from the machinery. They do not have any bolts, holes or keyways in them and they are of a reasonably slow rotation. Although the risk is very low due to the location of a lot of these, there is still the risk of entanglement so we are looking at setting out a company approach on this to avoid confusion.
Therefore I am looking for some guidance relating to this I have found some American guidance but nothing definitive for the UK as everything is a little "hazy" so if anyone can point me in the right direction I would be grateful.
Many thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Low,
There is UK guidance on rotating machinery. You may be aware of this but if not and you could start with the HSE's guidance Safe use of work equipment (it is the ACoP for the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations).
In particular where it talks about Regulation 11, pages 36-38. And there is Appendix 1, pages 69-75.
The subject is not 'black-and-white' - in the guidance you will see the phrase 'reducing the risks to an acceptable level' - so you or your employer can make the decision about whether the risk with your drive shaft is at an acceptable level.
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Be aware that Reg 11 says practicable (qualified with must and should), not the usual lesser duty of SFAIRP
The OP needs to decide if its a dangerous part; if there is possibility of entanglement I'd be inclined to say yes.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If there is a possibility of entanglement then I would suggest guarding it as per PUWER requirements. I would also be tempted (if possible/practicable) to paint or mark the rotating end in some way so as to indicate that it is moving/rotating when the machine is running.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks for your comments, much appreciated I think we are going to go with the guarding as although it is low risk, there is still a rotating part so as a coverall so to speak it makes more sense.
Appreciate your thoughts though.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.