Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
RayRapp  
#1 Posted : 25 July 2016 15:18:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I would be obliged if anyone can advise whether smoke alarms need to be hard-wired or if a battery (10 year life) is compliant with the common parts of a domestic property i.e converted property. Think I know the answer but am getting conflicting information - thanks.
Invictus  
#2 Posted : 26 July 2016 08:04:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

RayRapp  
#3 Posted : 26 July 2016 08:48:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Thanks Invictus, but that document applies to purpose built blocks. I am looking for guidance for converted properties which is more aligned to Lacors guidance, but unfortunately even that document does not properly distinguish between hard wired and battery smoke alarms.
O'Donnell54548  
#4 Posted : 26 July 2016 12:05:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
O'Donnell54548

This will come down to the findings of your Fire Risk Assessment. Part of this will evaluate the suitability of your automatic alarm system based on the size of your building, the construction and the persons at risk. Often with the battery operated detectors in the common parts of a building is there may be problem with the noise level of the alarm to warn persons in their flats. Do you have a 'stay put' policy, and are the flat doors leading onto the common corridors (evacuation route) appropriately rated fire doors?
RayRapp  
#5 Posted : 26 July 2016 14:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

The FRA only identifies a smoke detector(s) should be fitted in the common parts, which by definition in converted properties are quite small areas. There will be no fire alarm for these properties, they are not classed as HMOs. These types of properties are not suitable for a 'stay put' policy because you cannot guarantee the integrity of the fire resistance of the building.
paul.skyrme  
#6 Posted : 26 July 2016 15:06:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

Ray, Have a look here: http://www.aico.co.uk/ Yes it is a manufacturers site, but this is good kit, we fit it and it works, locally it is the most used make of smoke alarm, they can be battery, wired supplied, wireless interlinked, wired interlinked, and can have central control switches. These can be built into a system, which is almost, I say almost, because it can never replace, a fully wired fire alarm system to BS 5839. They are used by housing associations, LA's, and their contractors, basically wherever a 5839 alarm isn't required!
RayRapp  
#7 Posted : 26 July 2016 17:26:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Paul Thanks I will take a look. Been having a mare with this subject, can't wait to get back into construction!
O'Donnell54548  
#8 Posted : 27 July 2016 07:44:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
O'Donnell54548

Ray - If it is described as a converted property with common parts this would imply to me that there is more than one tenant, and is further described as domestic tenants, why would this not be a House of Multiple Occupancy (HMO)?
Invictus  
#9 Posted : 27 July 2016 07:48:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

What do they have in the flats? Is there a reason they are not HMO's
RayRapp  
#10 Posted : 27 July 2016 08:55:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Guys, it is a very good question. I have been told that we do not have any HMOs in our portfolio. However I am not convinced, yet, this is true. That said, the properties I am describing are normally a converted house into two dwellings with their own bathroom, kitchen and toilet. In which case it is my understanding these types of properties would not be classed as a HMO, but happy to be corrected.
Invictus  
#11 Posted : 27 July 2016 09:20:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

From the housing act 'Any building, or part of a building, which is occupied only by two persons cannot be a HMO even though those two persons are unrelated. Therefore, for premises to be a HMO there must be at least three persons involved. This is a different number than that which applies to' Anyway 10 year smoke detection. But who tests it, to ensure it is working and at what intervals?
RayRapp  
#12 Posted : 27 July 2016 09:55:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Thanks, I have checked the definition of a HMO and as yet I have not identified any HMOs in our portfolio. Although the definition I checked was from the Housing Act 2004 which is a slightly different criteria. Who tests the battery? Another very good question. In discussion with our R&M personnel w can only identify an annual test, when the Gas Safe engineer checks the bolier. Not sure whether this would be deemed sufficient.
Alfasev  
#13 Posted : 27 July 2016 12:27:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Alfasev

I think your answer is in BS 5839: part 6. (as already mentioned) and the Building Regulations, Approved Doc B, however these are not retrospective. So the date of the conversion will dictate if these requirements are mandatory. I am guessing the property was converted some time ago and although the requirements are not mandatory I would put forward an argument to the landlord to try and convince them. I would argue that it is these standards you will be judged against if disaster struck, that they will have to justify any decision not to install them as any up to date fire risk assessment would have recommended hard wire alarms. As you have already mentioned there is no battery testing regime but can the landlord hand on hart say that their fire risk assessments and strategies are up to date/regularly reviewed, alarms have not be removed and that they doing want they promised to do or should do. On a large estate this is a big task and I do worry about some landlords I come across. Installation of hard wired alarm goes someway to discharging their duties.
RayRapp  
#14 Posted : 27 July 2016 12:38:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Alfasev, indeed there is plenty to consider. Including at present our 40 or so converted properties do not as a rule have any smoke alarms in common areas, so we are making the property safer. Hard wired smoke alarms cost about £100 each from our term contractors as opposed to £20 for battery operated...you do the sums.
O'Donnell54548  
#15 Posted : 27 July 2016 13:09:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
O'Donnell54548

Sorry, but I am a bit confused. From your description each have their own kitchen, bathroom and toilet. So what are the common parts? I have had a similar conversation with a Fire Officer at a block of 4 flats (definite HMO). The ground floor flats had their own front and rear doors, and there was a door to a staircase leading to the two first floor flats. Only the tenants in the first floor flats had access to this area, but the FO insisted this was a common area and that a automatic fire alarm system must be installed. I on the other hand argued that it was a shared access and that the FRA indicated that manual call points were sufficient. Argument went back and forward for over 12 months, and then suddenly the FO stopped visiting and communicating.
RayRapp  
#16 Posted : 27 July 2016 13:40:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Conversions will differ slightly, but as a rule they would be two self-contained dwellings in a semi with a common front entrance and either leading to a stairway or separate door at ground floor. Hence the common area would be the entrance hall. In my experience fire safety inspectors give conflciting advice and, sometimes not very good advice. So I usually take with a pinch of salt any advice I'm given. for example, one officer recently asked for the fire alarm in a sheltered scheme to be disabled when the scheme co-ordinator is present to reduce unwanted false alarms. I responded that under no circumstances were staff to disable the fire alarm for obvious reasons.
Rus1969  
#17 Posted : 27 July 2016 14:56:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rus1969

After spending 4 years in Social Housing, testing is a difficult one to manage, luckily most our properties had Gas boilers, and during the annual service (CP12) of the boilers, our very helpful Gas Engineers would test the Smoke alarm (hard wired, ten year back up) and we also got them to fit Carbon Monoxide detectors. Again we had to have a Maintenance plan in place for the kit, and when we went out to Tender for the Gas Servicing, the above was added. Common areas were a nightmare, and on the advice of the local Fire Brigade we had to remove any smoke detection and and keep the areas clean of any rubbish,bikes,prams,etc. Never a dull moment, but the FB got fed up with the darlings setting the alarms off, at one block the FB were called out 11 times over a weekend! Difficult to manage at times, I don't envy you!
firesafety101  
#18 Posted : 27 July 2016 15:11:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I am not an expert in HMOs but do have an interest. I recently had a conversation regarding a three storey purpose built block of private flats. Ground floor has front and rear exit, first and second floor had only front door and used the same staircase, which was a common area. He told me no requirement for fire alarm.
RayRapp  
#19 Posted : 27 July 2016 15:38:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

None of our General Needs properties (300+) have a fire alarm because they are purpose built blocks where fire separation and general building standards should be not require this extra control. Moreover, if the fire alarm was activated who would cancel and reset it? It would of course be set off maliciously more than an actual fire.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.