Rank: New forum user
|
Hi.
I am trying to purchase a multichannel portable gas monitor for pre/ use entry into grain silo's for cleaning.
Having looked at two commonly used monitors, I find that the ATEX certificates only state G for gas. One company could only offer a fixed head for D. (Zone 21 BTW).
Any one come across this issue? and if so, how did you manage to resolve?
Maybe I am just unlucky with my choice for monitor?
Thanks in anticipation
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Why are you worried about ATEX? Grain dust can be explosive, but as far as I know there's no form of flammable gas from grain storage. I would have thought you just need to check for oxygen level?
The info on OSHA website https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/grainhandling is pretty comprehensive and says nothing about flammable gas.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Hi imwaldra,
My concern is that the internals of the silos are Zone 21 and the ATEX standard for equipment to be used in such as Zone states that it must be D.
Irrespective of what gas is tested, the equipment ATEX should be compliant?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
"the letter G and/or D depending on whether it is intended for use in gas or dust atmospheres,"
Alfasev, to me, the words do not say that. It specifically says that the D or G is dependent upon the intended use.
So it would say G and D.
thanks
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You need to understand why it is certified Zone 1 - I'm pretty certain it's for dust. If so, a gas detector adds no value.
To be explosive the dust concentration in air has to be well above the level that causes breathing issues. So there normally isn't anyone around in such silos as they are filled, and the resulting dust cloud could be ignited by an elecrtic spark if non-ATEX equipment was used.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
you wouldn't need to test for gas in a grain silo? greater concern is explosive atmospheres and ingress of a free flowing solid (confined space regulations)
Obviously there could be additional issues that would necessitate the need to assess the air within a confined space such as silage/ slurry proximity?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Everyone has made good points.
It isn't my area of expertise, but before entering this confined space I would want to be assured that the atmosphere was safe to breathe. I know, for instance, that a steel container that is sealed for a long time will contain air that has too little oxygen for us to survive. The steel reacts with oxygen.
Also if there are traces of organic matter left in the silo, I would be asking whether they could be fermenting; this would also alter the balance of gases in the atmosphere.
Can they not be ventilated before entry?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It is some time since I was involved in confine space entries. I do not believe there is an explosion risk from using a Category 2 gas monitor in a Zone 21 atmosphere. The issue is dust affecting the sensors and the monitor false/default alarming or not detecting gases or oxygen levels. I believe this is the reason why they are not D rated however I have nothing to back this up. The best option is to contact a manufacture or someone link Mines Rescue.
However ACOP L138 paragraph 381 may be the way forward, if you adequately control the dust then you could use Category 2 G gas monitor.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Hey everyone. Many thanks for all your input to this.
I am purchasing a gas monitor which is for the entire site wide use. I wanted to assure myself that the one chosen was suitable to use inside a Zone 21. I have considered all points from my RA (entrapment) etc so was only concerned about using the detector inside the silo.
Alfaserv- I did contact manufacturer (make bright orange monitors..) who said "You are correct, our portable gas detectors are certified for Atex hazardous Gas zones, eg zones 1 and 2, not for dust zones" They then went on to say that some fixed head detectors were available for use in dust hazardous zones.
I know I am talking about a well controlled risk here (for instance, no grain present, vent if dusty) but with my worst case scenario head on, things go bang (yes, I know, very low risk) how would I (we ) stand?
However, your pointer to ACOP L138 para 138 is perhaps my way forward. I can demonstrate risks controlled by other methods as stated.
Thank you
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.