Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
wavy davy  
#1 Posted : 24 October 2016 14:22:21(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
wavy davy

Please advise if I'm being too picky here.

We have a requirement to repair an instrument, this involves using a small section of scaffold approx 10 ft in the air.

Under Reg 4 of the WAH regs we have a requirement to ensure that WAH is properly planned including planning for emergencies SFAIRP. The likelihood of someone needing to be rescued is very unlikely but it seems that we need to come up with a rescue plan.

I'm struggling to see a 'common sense' way out of this requirement. Can anyone assist?

johnmc  
#2 Posted : 24 October 2016 19:49:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
johnmc

Hi Davy, I think you have answered your own question.  Let common sense prevail, at 10ft up on a scaffold rescue should be a straight forward matter.  Personally I would just include the details within the safe system of work.

thanks 1 user thanked johnmc for this useful post.
wavy davy on 25/10/2016(UTC)
HeO2  
#3 Posted : 24 October 2016 20:07:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
HeO2

You still need a rescue plan that is briefed to all involved. It may be really simple, but there must be one. Dial 999 isn't a mitigation measure. If you have special circumstances you need to make the special arrangements. As always it comes down to risk assessment. How will you get an unconscious adult down from 10ft in the air without causing further harm? Phil
thanks 1 user thanked HeO2 for this useful post.
wavy davy on 25/10/2016(UTC)
Spencer Owen  
#4 Posted : 25 October 2016 08:14:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Spencer Owen

Hi Wavy Davy,

I work for an offshore rope access company and could help with a working at height rescue plan if you want? If it's not something you're used to doing I could give you a blank copy of our rescue from height plan and that might help point you in the right direction. 

alexmccreadie13  
#5 Posted : 25 October 2016 08:15:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
alexmccreadie13

I would not disagree with anythingb anyone has said.

To tackle this situation in my humble opinion would be like this.

1. Sop them falling Fall restraint as fall arrest is know good in this situation.

2. Try to ensure it is people who are fit and healthy doing the task.

3. In the unlikely event that someone takes ill who would be getting them down?

4. Have you height rescue medical trained people in the work force? If yes they will have a stretcher and can get the person to ground level for medical attention.

5. As the above is probably unlikley then the most sensiblest way is this.

Go and visit your nearest fire station and explain what you are going to do and when. You have to remember that a bigger emergency would put you as a low priority. As it is only 10 foot any of their ladders would suffice.

You would have to be prepared to carry out whatever steps were necessary to look after the ill person until emergency personel arrive.

Without training staff in working at height rescue and being medically trained the above option is the best.

A common sense approach is required and if you have notified the emergency services it is a better and more recognised method than trying to train your own workforce. 

Hope this helps and yes there will be other possibly better ideas. Have a MEWP ,Cherry picker on standby Crane with man riding basket but these are taking it to the extreme.

Ta Alex

 

   

firesafety101  
#6 Posted : 25 October 2016 10:57:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

My first thought was to hire a MEWP for potential rescue then I thought can you do the repair from a MEWP. Two birds with one stone. Any problems while inside the cage can be lowered to ground level using the hydraulics. Save on the scaffold cost and you can remove the MEWP when the job is finished instead of waiting for the scaffolders to return, which in itself is work at height requiring rescue plan.
thanks 1 user thanked firesafety101 for this useful post.
jamesangus47 on 25/10/2016(UTC)
jamesangus47  
#7 Posted : 25 October 2016 14:47:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jamesangus47

Originally Posted by: firesafety101 Go to Quoted Post
My first thought was to hire a MEWP for potential rescue then I thought can you do the repair from a MEWP. Two birds with one stone. Any problems while inside the cage can be lowered to ground level using the hydraulics. Save on the scaffold cost and you can remove the MEWP when the job is finished instead of waiting for the scaffolders to return, which in itself is work at height requiring rescue plan.

This is the one.... cheaper than scaffold.... lower risk for both set up and break down. rescuse plan included.

Rees21880  
#8 Posted : 26 October 2016 07:17:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rees21880

I agree that the MEWP solution is a good one, though you still require a rescue plan (an example one can be found on the IPAF website http://www.ipaf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/en/RescuePlan.pdf)

Pete

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.