Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi all, After many years of working for constrution companies with 100% PAYE staff, i am now at one where everyone (bar the office staff) are self employed and am struggling to get my head around things. The self employed guys, from what i can gather, seem fall into two distinct categories:
Type 1) Sole traders who are directly engaged by the company as individuals. Many of these have worked almost exclusively for the firm for many years and are essentially full members of staff. They get paid at the end of each week, are on the company training matrix, have most of their training paid for etc Type 2) Sole traders who are engaged through one of the above sole traders. The "type 1" sole trader will be paid a lump of cash each week and will then pay the guys working "for" him. In many cases it seems that the company doesn't know exactly who these guys are and tends to put the trust in the person "employing" them. At the moment i'm struggling to get my head around where the responsibility lies for things such as: -RAMS -Provision of PPE (as well as face fitting to RPE) -Training in general (including PPE) Does anyone else work with a similar setup and if so, how do you manage it? Thanks in advance Stern
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In addition to the above, RIDDOR reporting as well!?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ok here goes, All the Guys that you have on site that work for you need to be covered under your commitment to H&S in the contract you have with the Pricipal Contractor. What this means is that effectively all the self employed, sole traders will be seen as employees of yours and representing your company on site. Therefore you need to ensure that you treat them as any employees on a site and make sure that they are inducted, Trained and protected as say a full time employee. You would be responsible for issuing PPE, Writing of RAMS and H&S policys and things like Toolbox talks, Face fit training etc..
Ideally you would select someone to act as your Site Manager, someone with a Practical as well as knowledgable experiance that can run the site jobs for your company. I'm a little concerned that some of the workers will also bring other workers, and you'll be responsible for these workers who you havn't met!. I would ask the guys to let you have the contact dedails and you contact the person to see if they are suitable and have the experience and qualification to be on the site and do the Job. I was working on a site where someone said that they would bring their mate in to help with Steel Errecting etc, turns out the Guy was hopeless his last job of 23 years was a butcher! Remember you run the Company They work for you!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Just curious how you can have self-employed people who are that embedded in the business, that seems just immoral to me as well as surely against tax laws and other employment things?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It's not that unsual for staff to be self-employed or contingent staff provided by an agency in construction and especially in the railway industry - glad I'm out of it.
As for the RAMS, it is best if all those who are in effect 'employees' from a h&s perspective work to the company's procedures and RAMS. Pointless them all having a different set of RAMS.
TBH, I am surprised you are asking these questions - what happened before you arrived?
|
 1 user thanked RayRapp for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Additionally your company is at serious risk from the tax point of view and more serious risk from Social Securuty as the co can be seen as liable for both tax and social payments e.g.NI when working in the way that they are
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
For Construction Workers who are Self Employed they need to register under the CIS scheme with the Tax office. Its not uncommon for companies to have all self employed workers and lay them off inbetween jobs
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hello all, Thankyou for the reponses, very helpful. The "type 1" guys i mentioned in my initial post who are "employed" as individuals are fairly straighforward as for all intents and purposes they're just members of staff. It's the others (type 2) that are causing me the confusion. I know it's not unusual for companies to use gangs of self employed guys like this, with one guy being paid and then in turn paying the guys who work with/for him. What i'm struggling to get my head round is whether i treat these gangs as individuals (eg monitor and manage their training, RAMS, PPE etc ourselves, just like the type 1 guys) OR whether i treat them like a more traditional subcontractor (give them our terms and conditions and make sure that they meet them). It also gets even more confusing as the "head" of at least one of these gangs has registered himself as a Ltd company. HELP!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: RayRapp  It's not that unsual for staff to be self-employed or contingent staff provided by an agency in construction and especially in the railway industry - glad I'm out of it.
As for the RAMS, it is best if all those who are in effect 'employees' from a h&s perspective work to the company's procedures and RAMS. Pointless them all having a different set of RAMS.
TBH, I am surprised you are asking these questions - what happened before you arrived?
Hi RayRapp, That is kind of where my confusion lies. My understanding was always that the employer writes the RAMS. I've been lucky in that during my 8-9 years of H&S, the line has always been very clear. Now though, i'm struggling to understand who's who! Here's the full range of people i've found so far 1) PAYE staff 2) Sole traders (individuals) 3) Sole traders (part of a gang paid via the "head" of the gang who is also a sole trader) 4) Sole traders (part of a gang paid via the "head" of the gang who has registered himself as a Ltd company) Number 1 is obvious. Number 2 is also fairly black and white. It's 3 and 4 where i'm going round in circles!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This has for a long time been on the go and the taxman occasionally catches up and the preverbial hits the fan. UBER have just had their self employed TAXI drivers declared employees as they can not work for anyone else, not even as self employed as they were. UBER will appeal because the costs involved are astronomical.
I worked for a shop fit company who used the same Foremen all the time, and they employed their 'mates' as and when. RAMS were done between myself and the foremen and all hands were considered to be employed but only as far as working on site. Not for PAYE purposes. I am currently self employed and can work for whoever I wish to but now releasing a lot of my work and will only have one Client. Part time. I will not be pushing for PAYE because that would mean a drop in pay. One piece of advice from me is where the limited company is concerned. All sub contractors should be competence checked and therefore check out the limited company and see what experience, insurance, RAMS etc. he can provide. If he is an employer he is responsible for everything, including his workers.
|
 1 user thanked firesafety101 for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: firesafety101  This has for a long time been on the go and the taxman occasionally catches up and the preverbial hits the fan. UBER have just had their self employed TAXI drivers declared employees as they can not work for anyone else, not even as self employed as they were. UBER will appeal because the costs involved are astronomical.
I worked for a shop fit company who used the same Foremen all the time, and they employed their 'mates' as and when. RAMS were done between myself and the foremen and all hands were considered to be employed but only as far as working on site. Not for PAYE purposes. I am currently self employed and can work for whoever I wish to but now releasing a lot of my work and will only have one Client. Part time. I will not be pushing for PAYE because that would mean a drop in pay. One piece of advice from me is where the limited company is concerned. All sub contractors should be competence checked and therefore check out the limited company and see what experience, insurance, RAMS etc. he can provide. If he is an employer he is responsible for everything, including his workers.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Stern
Regardless of their status I feel confident all those you have identified who are working regularly for your company will be regarded as an 'employee' from a h&s perspective and in any case, the company will be responsible for them pursuant to s2 or s3 HSWA. The h&s test is the 'Master/Servant' relationship. Nothwithstanding this, just ensure all your workforce work to the same policies, procedures, RAMS, PPE, etc, regardless of their work status - that's my best advice I can give.
|
 1 user thanked RayRapp for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Firesafety101, Thanks for taking the time to respond. I did write a reply with your post as a quote but for some reason it has vanished!
So far as the Ltd company thing goes, my initial reaction when i heard he was Ltd was to put them through a full pre-qualification questionnaire and then manage them as i would any other subcontractor firm back in my previous employment. However, back in the day i dealt with large contractrors and, although he's technically a Ltd, he's not REALLY a company in that respect, he's just a guy who's registered himself as a Ltd company for whatever reason and has a few guys who work with him.
The general consensus seems to be that a gang of sole traders, headed up by a soletrader become our responsibility when they work for us (in terms of RAMS, PPE etc) and that there's little or no difference between them and ful time PAYE staff. Does that change the instance the main guy in the gang registers himself as a Ltd company?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: RayRapp  Stern
Regardless of their status I feel confident all those you have identified who are working regularly for your company will be regarded as an 'employee' from a h&s perspective and in any case, the company will be responsible for them pursuant to s2 or s3 HSWA. The h&s test is the 'Master/Servant' relationship. Nothwithstanding this, just ensure all your workforce work to the same policies, procedures, RAMS, PPE, etc, regardless of their work status - that's my best advice I can give.
Thankyou RayRapp, although i'm still well and truly stuck in that grey area! Take PPE as an example; PAYE staff will of course have PPE provided. Subcontractors though, they have to provide their own. The same can be said with RAMS, work equipment etc. The issue is trying to work out who's who! Ultimately the requirement to risk assess, provide PPE, provide traniong etc lies with the employer and at the moment, for 50% of the guys working on our sites i'm still not convinced whether or not that's us!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
 1 user thanked RayRapp for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: RayRapp 
That's brilliant RayRapp, thanks for that!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
With all due respect this is just a 'control test' example as the limited co / sole trader etc. areas are red herrings e.g. if somebody is controlled by an employer by more than 50% of their time in work then they are a servent irrespective of other areas so the master has the duties to manage and provide PPE where the RA indicates the need
As for tax and especially social security areas your company is at a very high risk especially so as the HSE do not enforce whereas the other areas very much proactively do and they use an additional formula to work out who is liable for NI, pensions etc.
in my opinion this type of working is used by employers to try to get away with their duties/taxes etc. My advice to evaluate the control test aspects and go from there best of luck
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.