Rank: New forum user
|
hi, the guys in our company have been told they must wear safety shoes at all times, even when collecting paperwork from office (although office staff dont wear them). A few of the guys have complained because if there are any risks in the office then surely everyone should be wearing them. the companies response has been to send a letter to the guys stating that safety shoes are part of the uniform and must be worn. they have even said that they have to wear them if they enter the office before their scheduled start time. Can they do this?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I suspect this is being done because they want to be sure that everybody is wearing safety shoes at work and blanket approach is often applied eg hard hats for guys digging holes on the side of the road with no
overhead hazards. Not ideal but not uncommon.
Are the safety shoes particularly unconformable?
Where could the change between wearing and not wearing
safety shoes take place?
Finally (the clincher) do managers and other office staff, all wear safety shoes when they go into the ‘dangerous areas’ where safety
shoes are required?
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
there isnt any provision to change. they have to do it in their vans. no, managers and supervisors have been told they dont have to wear them at all. the health and safety woman visited a site in open toed shoes. they have a range of boots available but the complaint is based on the fact they have to wear them to enter the office to collect time sheets.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I can understand their frustraton - but management can decide the details of any required workplace 'uniform'. Of course any competent manager would consult and involve the affected personnel before doing so, and it sounds as if that didn't happen.
Attempting to act as a neutral, you could ask about what the underpinning risk assessment(s) say about hazards and footwear standards for all company personnel visiting areas that are not their normal workplace. If there isn't one, that would at least sort out the issue of office people visiting other areas in the 'wrong' footwear?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I woulld say the real issue here is not that your site employees are asked continue to wear safety shoes when visiting offices, it's that your office employees do not wear safety shoes while visiting sites. That is the issue you need to address.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If it is also unifrom then where is the problem? On the other hand if it is just PPE sometimes you put in a blanket rule when people go into and out of different locations - they can't forget to put PPE on that they already have on.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I assume that the problem here is that the office and their place of work are not just next-door. Therefore, they have to drive from the site where they are working to the office, and in order to do this safely and comfortably they may change out of their safety shoes into their normal shoes, and now have to change back into their safety shoes to enter the office?
In which case it is ridiculous. There is no way seeing someone in safety shoes in the office is in any way a sufficient way of ensuring they are doing so on site. Especialy if they have to remove them in order to drive to the site they are working in.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
What short of safety shoes are they wearing that they cannot drive in them? The only safety shoes that I have ever had to wear that I would not have been able to drive in were for a visit to a large foundry. I often wear the safety shoes that I have at present instead of my normal shoes as they are comfortable and indistinguishable from normal shoes, except for a slightly thicker sole. Other posters are correct. Your real issue is to try to devise a practicable policy that ensure that anyone entering an area where safety shoes are needed for safety purposes wears them. I would ask for the risk assessment that requires one set of persons to wear safety shoes in the office but not for others more permanently based there. After all, the requirement for safety shoes should only be based on the risk assessment! Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
If they (the management) say this is as H&S matter they are clearly wrong as they are not applying the same controls for different types of staff in the sane areas. If it a matter of uniform then it’s a bit different as organisations can insist on a dress code or uniform as long as it is reasonable and relates to the job. Interestingly the matter of dress codes or uniforms was raised during the summer on the internet, when a woman complained about an employer insisting she wear high heels as these were part of the dress code and gave the right impression to visitors to the organisation. General consensuses (including comments by lawyers) were that this was wrong on the grounds that it was: - Discriminatory as it only applied to female employees not males
- Inappropriate as it did not relate to the job; being “sexy” was not part of the job, so you could not really force them to wear them.
In this case there is clear discrimination as only some of the staff, have to wear a “smart” uniform and you could ask the question does wearing safety shoes make the delivery guys look “smarter” than a normal pair of shoes.
Another thought has arisen are the delivery people paid by the hour or by the delivery ie are they changing their shoes on the own time?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: chris.packham  What short of safety shoes are they wearing that they cannot drive in them? The only safety shoes that I have ever had to wear that I would not have been able to drive in were for a visit to a large foundry. I often wear the safety shoes that I have at present instead of my normal shoes as they are comfortable and indistinguishable from normal shoes, except for a slightly thicker sole.
Thats a surprising thing for someone to pick me up on. I have never driven in safety boots as I don't find them comfortable they are too heavy on the foot pedals in my opinion. We are all different. Sure, I could drive in my safety boots if I had to, although there is no reason why I, or anyone else, should.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
As I'm typing this im sitting in the office wearing safety boots. Worn them on and off for over 25 years and feel odd if I don't! No problems driving! In my previous job I had plennty of chats with delivery drivers making deliveries via the warehouse with no safety boots, which are 'always in the van'. As others have mentioned its a blanket policy to ensure compliance of wearing PPE, not the best approach but it is what it is. If they make it part of the uniform policy then employees are required to adhear to said policy.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Is the issue here a safety matter or a practicality matter? In other words, one office visit a week or one every hour? It may simply be too much time lost in changing shoes, therefore making it practical that staff wear safety shoes at all times. This also means that staff dont 'forget' and simply wear normal shoes at all times.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I can see your frustration here or lack of clarity from management! My question would be are you in a position where you should be wearing safety boots at all times anyway, i.e. trade or skilled workforce who are more likely to be at risk from injury? Officer workers are at a much lower risk to foot injury, however if they where to enter an area like a factory floor or storage facility and have duties where they have to undertake manual handling activities, use pallet trucks etc then they should be issued with safety boots and must wear them before entering such locations or undertaking tasks. How does the company display PPE signage, is it clear what level of PPE is required for each area you are in? Im assuming there is no signage up in the offices you visit!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
They may also not want drivers turning up at the customer, sitting outside changing from their trainers to safety shoes. Note OP did say shoes not boots. You don’t have to have steel toe caps, they do light composite shoes.
So yes, if it is part of uniform there is no reason for them not to insist if they want. The H&S person is not customer facing, so she can wear high healed flip flops if she wants and company rules allow.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In my branded safety shoes I can drive - not as comfortable as my out of work choice.
In my safety boots (composite toe) I have less pedal control basically thanks to their "ankle support"
In my preference safety footwear of rigger boots still not the same as casual or formal footwear but much better than once ups
For journeys involving a lot of clutch control (long drives or non- motorway especially rush hour) I will always put on comfortable footwear
IF there are customer facing concerns work with the drivers to select the correct PPE for the task
One thing a TRUE H&S professional will do is walk the talk - open toed high heels stinks as an example to the work force but not uncommon when clip board consultants are used by a business.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In my branded safety shoes I can drive - not as comfortable as my out of work choice.
In my safety boots (composite toe) I have less pedal control basically thanks to their "ankle support"
In my preference safety footwear of rigger boots still not the same as casual or formal footwear but much better than once ups
For journeys involving a lot of clutch control (long drives or non- motorway especially rush hour) I will always put on comfortable footwear
IF there are customer facing concerns work with the drivers to select the correct PPE for the task
One thing a TRUE H&S professional will do is walk the talk - open toed high heels stinks as an example to the work force but not uncommon when clip board consultants are used by a business.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Yup !!! You're right.. Prevention is better than cure!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
For what it's worth, I always "carry" 2 pairs of safety shoes, one I put on before I leave the house, I drive in them, and if the site is clean and tidy, I wear them on site. I carry a second pair for oily/muddy sites. My pair from the house are not steel toe capped, they are kevlar, they are training shoe design. I pick them because I can drive in them, and wear them for prolonged periods, and IF I have to go thruogh a security check, they help.
So the key is get the right, footwear, like lala things, the cheapest, is rarely the best option.
Is the footwear these people are being forced to wear suitable for driving.
I can, drive a Transit van in riggers, but, I don't think I could drive a Ferrari in them. Also, to drive for long periods in riggers is uncomfortable, and tiring.
So you need to look at your footwear policy.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Skimming throught the responses I would add, they are either safety shoes i.e. PPE or uniform - they cannot be both. If they are PPE and required for office, then all office staff must wear them. Managers must set a good example and abide by the same requirements.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I don't see any reason they couldn't be both PPE and uniform.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: Kate  I don't see any reason they couldn't be both PPE and uniform.
Yes they can be both but their role as PPE takes precedent over their role as a uniform. So if they were genuinely PPE, then everybody
should be wearing, not just the warehouse guys.
|
 1 user thanked A Kurdziel for this useful post.
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.