Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
HSE_Steve  
#1 Posted : 13 December 2016 10:24:06(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
HSE_Steve

Morning All,

what are your opinions on the legal duties around charging for replacing lost safety knives. My thoughts are that as they have been selected for the 'safety' aspect of their function then section 9 of the HSWA comes in, the 'duty not to charge'. If people continually lose them and aren't carefull enough then I suggested we could go down the disciplinary route, but what we can't do is charge.

Any opinions would be great.

thanks.

Invictus  
#2 Posted : 13 December 2016 10:34:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Originally Posted by: HSE_Steve Go to Quoted Post

Morning All,

what are your opinions on the legal duties around charging for replacing lost safety knives. My thoughts are that as they have been selected for the 'safety' aspect of their function then section 9 of the HSWA comes in, the 'duty not to charge'. If people continually lose them and aren't carefull enough then I suggested we could go down the disciplinary route, but what we can't do is charge.

Any opinions would be great.

thanks.

You can charge as they are not a safety issue they would in my opinion come under PUWER.

RayRapp  
#3 Posted : 13 December 2016 10:40:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Agree with Invictus, I cannot see a good argument that safety knives are provided as PPE. They may be selected because they are a safer alternative than conventional knives - but that's all.
Clark34486  
#4 Posted : 13 December 2016 10:49:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clark34486

Wouldn't suggest that a craft knife/ stanley is an item of PPE (even were an assessment suggests they are a safer alternative to another piece of equipment)

Dependant on what they are used for it could be construed that this is a consumable item anyway

HSE_Steve  
#5 Posted : 13 December 2016 11:00:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
HSE_Steve

thanks everyone - not suggesting they are PPE but isn't section 9 broader than that - anything that has been bought or pursuant to a statutory requirement; with that being the requirement to reduce 'as far as is reasonably practicable......' They have specifically been bought because they are safer, not because they are better than the existing ones.

thanks

RayRapp  
#6 Posted : 13 December 2016 11:19:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Section 9 could have a broad remit, indeed the wording suggests it could apply to almost anything provided in respect to safety. Notwithstanding the vague wording, I think applying S9 in the context of mislaying safety knives is a step too far.
Roundtuit  
#7 Posted : 13 December 2016 12:16:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Before heading off down the route of trying to charge employees for consumables

How / Why are these items being lost?

Are customers getting free gifts delivered with the product?

Are people putting them in their overall pockets and forgetting they are there when they drop them in the laundry service?

Is workplace design a contributory factor - lack of a designated work station holder the employee returns the knife to when not in use?

Is the knife suitable for the activity? (free roaming employees at another employment had push clip lanyards to stop knives being left around the workplace)

Only then should you consider contractual arrangements with your employees regarding deductions - that employment tribunal may prove way more expensive

https://www.gov.uk/understanding-your-pay/deductions-from-your-pay

Roundtuit  
#8 Posted : 13 December 2016 12:16:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Before heading off down the route of trying to charge employees for consumables

How / Why are these items being lost?

Are customers getting free gifts delivered with the product?

Are people putting them in their overall pockets and forgetting they are there when they drop them in the laundry service?

Is workplace design a contributory factor - lack of a designated work station holder the employee returns the knife to when not in use?

Is the knife suitable for the activity? (free roaming employees at another employment had push clip lanyards to stop knives being left around the workplace)

Only then should you consider contractual arrangements with your employees regarding deductions - that employment tribunal may prove way more expensive

https://www.gov.uk/understanding-your-pay/deductions-from-your-pay

WatsonD  
#9 Posted : 13 December 2016 12:19:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
WatsonD

I would suggest everyone gets issued one (or however many) to start with, which they sign-out and subsequent safety knives will be issued upon request.

It is fair to expect that you as an organistaion need to track stock and therefore expenses; and the staff in question having to be individually accountable for the number they use usually makes them a bit more careful of  losses.

The only issue you would need to ensure you manage against would be the potential of theft of each others safety knives that would come from a reluctance to ask for more.

But I would suggest improve your systems, rather than preaching legislation

HSE_Steve  
#10 Posted : 13 December 2016 12:58:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
HSE_Steve

Thanks everyone, 

I can assure you I am trying to persuade the local managers to look at any number of things before either charging / discipline, but thats another story - I was just after whether peoples opinions were that the department in question could legally charge or not. I certainly don't advocate either approach, they really need to just find a way to stop them being lost.

Roundtuit  
#11 Posted : 13 December 2016 13:21:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Only if a recharge is covered by a term already in the employees contract

Otherwise you will have to renegotiate contracts or give notice of change

Then be prepared for employees countering by wanting to bring their own (probably non-safety) knives

Roundtuit  
#12 Posted : 13 December 2016 13:21:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Only if a recharge is covered by a term already in the employees contract

Otherwise you will have to renegotiate contracts or give notice of change

Then be prepared for employees countering by wanting to bring their own (probably non-safety) knives

Invictus  
#13 Posted : 13 December 2016 13:32:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

You don't have to rewrite the terms and conditions to charge for a knife. You would only need a policy to state that this is what will happen. Employees cannot just say well we will bring our own in, you just ban the knives from the site.

The easiest way is to put a provcedure in place so that you can control the knives.

You could always put a vending macxhine in that will only allow so many to be claimed in one day so that you can calculate how many are being used.

Invictus  
#14 Posted : 13 December 2016 13:41:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

What type is it, is it the type we all think of with spare blades in the handle, is it craft knife type or is it a fish knife type? You also need to investigate where they are going if you are losing a lot of them.

bob youel  
#15 Posted : 14 December 2016 09:21:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Only a court can decide just what S:9 applies too but I am convinced that it is wider than just PPE, a trap that many have fallen into, therefore if those specific knives are supplied because they enhance safety then it can be argued that S:9 applies

This is a simple management issue and it appears yet again that they cannot manage without having something to blame e.g. H&S so advise accordingly and then let them get on with it

Additionally PUWER and many other areas also apply at the same time apart from the base safety angle as they also need to be fit for purpose

Invictus  
#16 Posted : 14 December 2016 11:01:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

Are we saying then that if we put guarding on a machine or around the machine and it fails or in someway is bypassed that S:9 is applicable?

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.