Originally Posted by: biker1 
Not sure I agree with this on logical grounds, and it is not exactly what it said for the detectors we bought. If the assumption is that the CO will rise due to heat and relative density (which is only slightly less than air), it will take longer to reach the height of the ceiling, which might delay its detection, but then I suppose you could say the same thing about smoke.
The CO will rise as it will be mixed with the products of combustion, which will have more heat energy than the surrounding air, thus will rise, therefore taking the CO with them to the detector, the same as any smoke, which is products of combustion, is hot and rises, hence why one is advised to keep low in a fire because the smoke will take longer to get to the floor.
Also, if you, read, my posts, you will see that I advised that one must seek guidance from the detector OEM, as they all have subtly different modus operandi, whilst all in compliance with the product standard.
Simple physics proves that the Aico guidance is correct however, for a CO emitting appliance IN the room with the detector.
Aico are a very competent organisation, and, are well respected in the elecrical industry, by installers and others.
By the way, I have no connection with Aico, other than a satisfied user.
As one can see above, from the OP's response, their customer service is also very good..
Their offering could give one an "almost" full fire & CO detection system wirelessly linked to rival a full installed fire alarm system.
Certainly for ones home, and anywhere a full fire alarm system is not required, they have a very comprehensive offering.
I have their wireless CO detectors & smoke alarms in my home, installed as per their guidance, all wirelessly interlinked to a wireless central test & locate switch, which discerns the difference between a smoke or CO activation. 10 yr battery life, 10yr detector life, what more can you expect.
Edited by user 22 December 2016 13:42:44(UTC)
| Reason: Spelling, where's the spell checker gone!