Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
ADALE  
#1 Posted : 03 January 2017 16:27:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ADALE

Hi all,

from sitting the Unit A of the NDip I seem to remember a figure of approximately 2 years (taking account the how long is a piece of string element) being discussed in implemented a recognised management model be it HSG 65 or OHSAS 18001 as was current at the time.

I'd like to know where this figure came from as I've cited it many times over the last 5-6 years (paraphrasing) but don't recall seeing a published reference source. Does anybobdy have a documented resource they could point to to help narrow my websearches and textbook time hunting please. 

Opinions welcome by those with good experience implementing management systems also. It may just be my experience by finding practitioners with HSMS implementation experience is thinner on the ground than I imagined.

Happy New Year all - let's make it a safe one

RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 04 January 2017 08:15:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Happy new year to you.

I don't really see how anyone can put a timescale to the implementation of a SMS because it would surely depend on how onerous is the task. In other words, what is already in place, the size of the organisation and the resources to properly manage the processes. For instance, common sense tells me a SME would require a more modest system compared with a MNE.

ADALE  
#3 Posted : 04 January 2017 08:53:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ADALE

Hi Ray,

and Happy New year to you too. I couldn't agree more and maybe I could have put more detail into the bracketed peice of string content in the original post. I'm not really looking to explore that area, just hoping for a resource as my websearch and text book review didn't yield anything either. 

I'm sure this is going to end up experienced based from here on but I would like at least one reference to cite if possible. Less tangible elements such as culture, collaboration and other operational area maturation will all feed into this. It's just I know I'm not the only person to have heard or quoted this '2 year' timescale - even though as discussed, it's not hard and fixed.

Thanks for the comment though, always appreciated. 

Kind regards 

chris42  
#4 Posted : 04 January 2017 09:09:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

I also agree with Ray, depends what is in place already and the willingness of the natives to implement any changes. The only time scale I have ever heard, was we should allow 3 months following implementation of any procedures to allow evidence to be generated. However, if you had been doing all that was necessary before just no formal procedure then you already have your evidence.  You really need to have implemented all necessary procedures and done the first round of internal audits. As you say length of string.

I have been asked this question at interview before, I don't think they liked my answer.

ADALE  
#5 Posted : 04 January 2017 12:10:56(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ADALE

Hi Chris,

another valid point without doubt. I suppose our experience filters our opinions.

Coming from a Construction & Engineering background more recently, I can't envisage putting even HSG 65 into place with a reasonable compliance (Assumed insurance Band C 61-80% compliance) from Policy creation, through mandates and Directives being set by Leaders, to Procedures discussed with workers and representatives; through to a formal review of procedures and monitoring techniques etc. being carried out in under 18 months (as recently given as an experience by a colleague), and the 24 month period being pefectly acceptable.

I'm not talking documentation creation, but behavioural safety observed in a potential accreditation scenario, or even just internal audit process of observing workplace practise. I think after trying to introduce 12-15 procedures for key areas covered or over lapping arrangements stated in policy over a 2 year period is a reasonable challenge without over-phasing a workforce too (all things being equal in organisational structure and demands).

I know there's no one size fits all, to be honest the detail has removed me from the original question.

I'm looking for a reference to which old tutor may have used, or perhaps it was just his own experience. I'd be interested to poll this as part of research if needed. 

regards as always

markwmansell  
#6 Posted : 04 January 2017 13:30:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
markwmansell

Adale,

I have a lot of experience in implementing management systems and I haven't heard of this 'two year' timeframe. It may have been your old tutors own experience. However, I do normally set a two year goal for the management system to be created (or re-build), embedded into to an organisations culture and to start to achieve continued improvement.

I agree with the other posters as it does depend on scope, business context and shape/size of the organisations. Also, it depends on the framework you are working towards - you have already mentioned the most well-known ones but there are others.

You should look at management system review/creation and the system implementation/embedding as two different tasks.

Not sure I have I fully answered your original post.

ADALE  
#7 Posted : 04 January 2017 21:15:24(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ADALE

Hi Mark (I think?)

thanks for taking the time to reply. Your response intrigues me more, you haven't heard of the time frame either but similarly give an opinion in your own experience. I'm aware of other standards, only notably in chemical engineering at some point in my final BSc year, but am aware in-house can be developed too.

Just in case I've not read my own responses, I wanted to say at no point have I disagreed with any of the above comments, quite the opposite. I don't imagine a small lower risk environment to need a full 2 years, but I imagine 2 cycles to create and implement (1st year) then monitor, audit and review (2nd year) would be almost common sense. I just want to cite it from a referenced source if possible.

Thanks again

markwmansell  
#8 Posted : 05 January 2017 08:22:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
markwmansell

Unfortunately I think you are going to struggle to find an "official" reference a source for the two year timeframe. Good luck with your NDIP.

Brian Campbell  
#9 Posted : 06 January 2017 19:18:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Brian Campbell

Hi Adale,  I dont think your going to find anything regarding a timescale but the best sopurce would be BSI as OHSAS 18001 is pretty much their concept.  I started working towards 18001 back in 2011 and we even brought in an external expert to help set a system up, we only becam acredited in 2015 as it took a while to implement procedures and bring all departments into line with the system, not to mention additional training for staff.  We did however keep the old HSG65 system running along side the 180001 up until we wnt for and achieved accreditation.

Hope this helps

Brian

ADALE  
#10 Posted : 09 January 2017 12:03:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ADALE

Hi Brian,

thanks for the advice there, that's a refreshing bit of information too, hurdles and real life trials. Much appreciated. I'll try BSI and SGS to see if they have anything too. 

Regards

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.