IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Southwark Council fined for tower block fire
Rank: Super forum user
|
Tragic and avoidable fire resulted in multiple deaths. I fail to understand how the council did not have a FRA for the property, especially as the council are right under the noses of the LFB HQ!.
'Lessons will be learnt' - really?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/feb/28/southwark-council-fined-570000-over-fatal-tower-block-fire
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Very tragic. I understand since this incident in 2009 the Southwark have been investing heavily in residential sprinkler systems for its properties - amongst other things. In fact the article cites £62 million in investment.
A shame that something tragic has to happen, but, hopefully, a shot across the bows to other landlords.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Somehow I don't think so. The duties pursuant to the FSO have been in force for over a decade - no excuses for not complying. Apathy and the mentality 'it won't happen to us' is the root cause in my opinion.
The fine was surprisingly low given the severity, although the SC guidelines do not apply to the FSO, there is anecdotal evidence that safety related offences outside of the scope of the guidelines have been increasing.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The fire was an electrical problem according to the LFB. I wonder just how many of these old flats have only 1 or 2 13amp sockets in their living room? With the majority of households having masses of electrical equipment, TV's, CD players, DVD's PC's just how many flats have been rewired to cope with the influx of electronics or are they still dependant on householders still overloading their old and outdated sockets.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Trust me they all have 50 inch flat screen TVs and all the gubbins that go with them.
|
 2 users thanked RayRapp for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I must admit that I know little about the case, however in terms of the detail of the FRA, if the fire did start in one of the flats would a FRA have picked up on any issues within the individual flats, in view of the fact they are domestic areas?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hopefull "lessons learned" will extend beyond LAs and domestic dwelling.
There is a real lack of understanding of fire stopping across most trades and many who commission work, and an all too common lack of post-contract or CoW confirmation of appropriate reinstatement (and often no reinstatement at all).
|
 1 user thanked Ron Hunter for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Interesting that everyone is focusing on the failures of the LA without mentioning the criticsm, and failure to apologise for their part in these avoidable deaths, of the London Fire Brigade?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: gerrysharpe  The fire was an electrical problem according to the LFB. I wonder just how many of these old flats have only 1 or 2 13amp sockets in their living room? With the majority of households having masses of electrical equipment, TV's, CD players, DVD's PC's just how many flats have been rewired to cope with the influx of electronics or are they still dependant on householders still overloading their old and outdated sockets.
It's not that type I would worry about, a extension is normally 13 amp (but do check). Satelite box, <0.5 amp, DVD <0.5, Tele 0.5, games console 0.86. What bothers me is Radiators oil filled 13, Hoovers 9 etc, it's people not realising what they can plug in and then to make it worse they plug in an extension into an extension to get more sockets. At home and at work.
|
 2 users thanked Invictus for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I should add context to my post for those that haven't read the full storey.
Whilst the fire is thought to have started in a domestic dwelling (faulty TV) the rate and direction of spread were due to inadequate fire stopping - most likely from lack of diligence during refurb/ maintenance projects.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I hope I've not rushed this but..
If you have a six-outlet extension lead with a 13A fuse in the plug then if you try and use 6 x 13A loads the fuse in the plug will open. If you have a coiled extension lead and pull over the recommended load for the coiled lead then you may well have a fire.
If you plug six 6 x outlet fully loaded extension leads into individual socket outlets of a 32A ring circuit and load them you'll try and pull about 468A and the circuit breaker/fuses will open pretty quickly (at about 46.5A) (and fault at 160A in about 0.1S) as they are designed to do.
The extension lead fuses will be trying to pass 78A and that 13A fuse should open at about 20A the 1.5mm flex will handle 16A and 4 A over this is not a real problem (Table 4F3A BS7671) For the most part loading is not the problem as overloads will be handled by the over current device. The problems are electrical faults not overload. Loose conductors, damaged cables, transforming coiled leads, placing heated electrical appliances where they shoul not be, not having the fixed wiring tested - loose connections,
Poor design such as installing too high a rated protective device such as a 45 A onto a fixed wiring circuit comes into play as if the wiring is then 1.5mm. We now have a problem with devices not being able to open in the required time under fault conditions But in this case it is not overload as such it is a real problem at sourse.
|
 2 users thanked Bob Hansler for this useful post.
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Originally Posted by: O'Donnell54548  Interesting that everyone is focusing on the failures of the LA without mentioning the criticsm, and failure to apologise for their part in these avoidable deaths, of the London Fire Brigade?
Good point that man. The LFB will argue, as do all regulators, the duty lies with the Landlord (LA) and therefore they are not responsible for the failures identified in the report. It is only a half-truth in my opinion. Without proactive enforcement and the fear of enforcement very little would be done to comply with legislation.
|
 1 user thanked RayRapp for this useful post.
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Southwark Council fined for tower block fire
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.