Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
clane  
#1 Posted : 21 July 2017 10:58:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
clane

Good Afternoon,

I have been asked by the Head of the HR dept to put together a brief synopsis of how implementing OHSAS 18001 would impact on the more senior members of staff in the charity I work for? 

We currently use HSG65 and in my opinion more often than not reach the standards we have set for ourselves. We recently had an external audit completed and I would say we scored an 8 out of 10, with a couple of advisories but nothing too diffult to rectify. However I'm pretty sure the jump to 18001 would require a significant investment on behalf all individuals concerned. 

Is there an easy way to try and estimate how much extra time and commitment would be required to make the necessary changes? Does each department need a total re-vamp of all things h&s? We are a h&s team of 2 with 500+ staff, of which half are based in 10 offices spread nationwide with the other half remotely working. So would the bulk of the work fall on us or require just as much input from mid and senior level managers? What else would we have to factor in?

Whether or not it would be commercially visable is another matter, I've not been asked to consider that but an overall total cost of implementing it would also be good to know..... ballpark? 

Thanks in advance,

Kate  
#2 Posted : 21 July 2017 12:34:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

It's unlikely you would be implementing 18001 now - it will soon be superseded by ISO 45001, so I suggest you look at that instead (if you can get hold of a copy of the draft standard).

Impossible to comment on how much change it would be for you.  You would need to do a gap analysis against the standard.  But in general, 18001, and more so 45001, emphasise the role of 'top management'.

thanks 1 user thanked Kate for this useful post.
clane on 21/07/2017(UTC)
peter gotch  
#3 Posted : 21 July 2017 12:49:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Hi Clane, when we moved from systems reflecting HSG65 towards OHSAS 18001, it wasn't that painful.
thanks 1 user thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
clane on 21/07/2017(UTC)
chris42  
#4 Posted : 21 July 2017 12:53:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

You may want to work out the costs for a three-year period (they renew every 3 years). At the beginning, they will probably want to visit each office of 25 people, and possibly a remote working team. Plus, HQ for general stuff and talk to senior management as Kate notes. You are looking at possibly 12 days at £700 to £800 per day watch how they add little extras, like extra cost for the actual cert etc. The next year (and the one after that) will only be a surveillance visit so less days etc (1/2).

The only way to know is get them in to give a quote (try and tie down for fixed costs per day for three years) and get them to build in travel expenses, otherwise you will be paying 45p per mile for the auditor to come from north of Scotland (or if you are in Scotland it will be Lands’ End)

Some companies are more expensive than others. I changed audit companies and the company saved over £8k in a three-year period.

Don’t forget the cost of training for you!

Get the standard and best of luck

I may be slightly cynical :o)

thanks 1 user thanked chris42 for this useful post.
clane on 21/07/2017(UTC)
Ian Bell2  
#5 Posted : 21 July 2017 13:09:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

I would say as a charity, you have your priorities wrong. I don't give money to charities for it to be wasted on expensive consultants and management systems, when HSG65 is adequate. What do the people /animals?? You help have to say?
Hsquared14  
#6 Posted : 21 July 2017 14:13:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hsquared14

I wouldn't even be looking at OHSAS 18001 now that BS 45001 has been approved, it would be a total waste of time and money.  Do you really need it anyway?  I would look at the scale of the risk that your employees (and probably volunteers) are exposed to.   The standards route is great if you have big risks that need careful control and bullet proof documentation but in a low risk environment it could become a millstone around your neck.  In lower risk environments very often you end up working for the system instead of the system working for you and helping you to do your job.  I've seen that so many times in OHSAS auditing right from when it was first issued in the late 1990s.  I'd stick with what you have at the moment and evaluate carefully what BS 45001 would do for you.

thanks 1 user thanked Hsquared14 for this useful post.
clane on 21/07/2017(UTC)
clane  
#7 Posted : 21 July 2017 15:10:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
clane

We are a sustainable transport charity so we focus on providing cycle routes and working with employers who want to encorage their staff to use alternative means of transport whilst improving their health and activity levels. We also engage with communities with a view to try and make their streets/area a more attractive place for people to live and socialise whilst reducing the impact of traffic in their neighbourhood. 

Generally speaking I would have thought in the grand scheme of things the risk to our staff is low to medium with the only real concerns coming through the occasional lone working situation and our maintenance teams. 

My personal opinion is that we don't need to make the change as what we have in place is working for us with a few small exceptions. As Hsquared14 has said, where is the improvement if we end up working for the system instead of the other way around and as a result drowning in unnecessary paperwork. Would still welcome other people's thoughts though on possible changes required if we were to proceed...

aud  
#8 Posted : 21 July 2017 17:00:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
aud

As I recall, research shows that safety management systems are good, but certified or accredited systems - no evidence to show you get any better safety outcomes. Better to spend effort where it matters.

18001 just channels effort into the 18001 way. It may have value for a company in the commercial competitive world. Otherwise, not worth the money or time.

Stuart Smiles  
#9 Posted : 22 July 2017 14:55:40(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Stuart Smiles

Lrqa are doing seminars as "lrqa live" coming up soon. Take the managers it would affect and show them what it would mean in terms of impacts on them. Personal view is being checked up on is valuable, and it also allows you to get the benefit of assessor experience within and around other firms. They are good and would recommend. As Kate said, draft 2 has been approved and on the forums on a different thread there was a link to the dis 2 document. I would start the process of aligning as you can either go with it or someone will find a reason to adopt, to me asking for alignment from hr is basically being polite, It's already decided that you are going to do it in someone's mind, It's just the process of selling to the business and who the champions are going to be that's not been communicated yet. Suggest you look at integrating a number of systems at the same time as well - 27001 to comply with gdpr, 9001 for business ops, 14001 and 45001 for environment and h&s all at the same time, as all the stuff needs to be managed and controlled either inside or via a "shadow system". And it also helps that we are all in it together. Looking at own areas and communicating how things are done properly. The focus seems to be on communicating what you want more so that people do things right in the first place, o I'd anticipate that will be similar to hsg65's focus on policies and comms. In addition, as a cycling/transport type organisation, I'd recommend looking at FORS and CLOCS for roads and vehicles management. (Have to eat own dogfood). For protecting vulnerable road users and running a transport side to off, it helps to centralize docs and put together available for examination and discussion. Auditors will look to see results of internal audits and make sure you are influencing and controlling the organisation's culture and behaviour, and you need to get everyone in board with that concept, and findings/issues/solutions being discussed openly.
Stuart Smiles  
#10 Posted : 22 July 2017 15:08:37(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Stuart Smiles

Note: Managers it would affect = whole senior management team, Inc chief exec, finance, everyone. If they can't get to a seminar together on the same day, then you know that they aren't going to do 45001 when they find things need to change in areas like record keeping, supplier management, and recording competence, processes and control of how things are done. You can also watch their reactions to what gets said and interactions with each other which is telling on how people feel adoption would go. The consultants can also do on-site, but I think it's better to do externally as they see the other organisations that are there and can talk to & listen to the "test of the room". For a hundred-150 quid a person you will get to see enough to know who and where people are on the subject. Best wishes and tell us how it goes.
Stedman  
#11 Posted : 26 July 2017 15:34:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Stedman

Clane,

As this is your opportunity to shine and you already have an HSG 65 modelled management system in place, I would recommend that you undertake a Management Status Review.  Avoid Consultants as you end up with their management system and not one which necessarily is compatible with you own organisation's systems and you personally don’t get the credit! 

After you have redrafted your management system, any good 18001 Certification Body should help you fill the gaps when they come around to sell you the Certification and during their initial audit.

To get you started, have a look at the following (free) IOSH document:  file:///C:/Users/alsmith/Downloads/Systems%20in%20focus%20(2).pdf​​​​​​​

If you want any further advice, PM and if it is the charity I think it is, I will gladly help you.  My employer also has a ‘Give a day of your time’ in which I could possibly help your organisation further.

thanks 1 user thanked Stedman for this useful post.
A Kurdziel on 28/07/2017(UTC)
Brian Campbell  
#12 Posted : 28 July 2017 14:47:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Brian Campbell

My advice would be to hold off until 45001 has been properly submitted to population and even give it a year or 2 to see what the feed back is like.  We have been 18001 certified for 3 years now and although we bought into a system from a local external H&S expert it wasnt all entirely painless.  Biggest hurdle is getting people onboard with change.  We made the jump from HSG65 becuse we deal with a lot of public and claims on an annual basis and 18001 has definitely helped with reduce the level of claims coming in and with reducing staff accidents.  I would suggest that if you dont currenly have a lot of staff accidents or incidents then why change at all, your obviously doing it right already!!

A Kurdziel  
#13 Posted : 28 July 2017 15:51:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

The difference is that HSG 65 is just what the HSE thinks an H&S management system should be like: it is purely advisory. OSHA 18001 (and ISO 450001) is designed to be auditable: someone can come along and compare what you do, to the standard and say yes you are complying or no you are not. They can then give you a nice certificate and an invoice.

If you think it is worth investing time and effort to bring your systems in line with an accredited standard because you think it will make getting work easier, great. But just going for it because you can, you might end up creating a rod for your own back in the future.

By the way what did the external auditors use as a benchmark?

I am always wary of auditors that turn up to look at an organisation’s H&S compliance without explaining what they are auditing against if it is not a proper standard.

HSE Chris Wright  
#14 Posted : 28 July 2017 22:25:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
HSE Chris Wright

Not really sure it would have a significant impact on the upper management apart from a financial side. If they want to become 18001 accredited to show your clients you have a certified management system then all good, but I would argue that if they believe it will somehow improve EHS performance then maybe they are looking at things wrong.

If you are committed then HSG65 is just as good,  you can easily obtain the 18001 standards and implement them without applying for a certificate.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.