Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Colin Calvert  
#1 Posted : 27 August 2017 20:40:44(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Colin Calvert

Hi Folks, Does anyone know where I can find design spec and safety guidance on the correct access/ egress requirements for a process pressure vessel that will require routine valve operation? I am prety sure there must be two openings dependant on the requirement for regular access. I suspect its in tbe CDM regs sonewhere, but would appreciate a pointer. Cheers, Colin
Ian Bell2  
#2 Posted : 28 August 2017 09:52:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

The answer you seek will NOT be in the CDM regs - CDM is just a generic design and construction set of regulations.

The pressure vessel's access ladders/platform will have been designed to a particular engineering/technical standard. If you are in the UK, possibly The Engineering Equipment and Materials Users Association (EEMUA) publication 105 'Factory stairways, ladders and handrails'

Or British Standard 4211 Specification for permanently fixed ladders

thanks 1 user thanked Ian Bell2 for this useful post.
Colin Calvert on 28/08/2017(UTC)
Ian Bell2  
#3 Posted : 28 August 2017 21:04:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

What liquid is in the vessel? Hydrocarbon? considerations/travel distances will also dictate the number of access ladders to the platform if the contents are flammable.

Also human factors consideration in terms of the expected frequency of valve operation should be given

Colin Calvert  
#4 Posted : 28 August 2017 21:29:28(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Colin Calvert

Originally Posted by: Ian Bell2 Go to Quoted Post
What liquid is in the vessel? Hydrocarbon?considerations/travel distances will also dictate the number of access ladders to the platformif the contents are flammable. Also human factors consideration in terms of the expected frequency of valve operation should be given
You guessed right Ian, HC's One visit per day routine visit and isolation activities 3 or 4 times per anum. I would expect it to be infrequent operation. Cheers
andybz  
#5 Posted : 01 September 2017 07:21:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
andybz

OGP 454 gives you some very high level guidance on the subject of valve access based on frequency and emergency use (Section 7.2).  This references ASTM F1166-07, which provides some detailed specifications that are strictly applicable to marine applications but generally entirely appropriate to all applications.

In practice, companies tend to set their own standards for valve access and means of escape.  The requirement for two means of escape usually depend on the size of the access platform (i.e. if only small only one stair/ladder is required).

Ian Bell2  
#6 Posted : 01 September 2017 08:30:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

OGP publication 434-5 Human factors in QRA also gives data and examples of estimating human error, also assessment techniques for assessing human factors.

boblewis  
#7 Posted : 01 September 2017 08:55:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Manual valve operation on a routine basis for an elevated valve on a pressure vessel!!! Have the designers never heard of pneumatic/hydraulic/electronic valve operation?  Back in my chemical engineering time I would have been shot for even contemplating such a design.

Ian Bell2  
#8 Posted : 01 September 2017 09:31:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian Bell2

Obviously we don't know enough about the design/situation - but you are possibly introducing a source of ignition in to a hazardous area - electronic/electrical sparks or hot surfaces from hydraulic systems. Will require  ATEX rating. Manual valves on a low frequency operation/access requirement, might be a better option.So maybe not such a great idea. Inherent safety principles and all that...

boblewis  
#9 Posted : 01 September 2017 12:22:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Originally Posted by: Ian Bell2 Go to Quoted Post

Obviously we don't know enough about the design/situation - but you are possibly introducing a source of ignition in to a hazardous area - electronic/electrical sparks or hot surfaces from hydraulic systems. Will require  ATEX rating. Manual valves on a low frequency operation/access requirement, might be a better option.So maybe not such a great idea. Inherent safety principles and all that...

The use of pneumatic controls was and is pretty standard throughout the petrochem industry.  I can only think of one where it was manual - the boiler blowdown valves

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.