Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Twelve years is a long time for any sort of SSOW/risk assessment. The question has it been reviewed or did they rest on their laurels?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I note it was the accused solicitor who states the SSoW/RA was 'commended' but not by whom - it could have been the cleaner. Clearly from the post actions ncluding demarcation lines for pedestrians and FLTs the SSoW did not appear very comprehensive.
Like all things in H&S only the courts can decide whether something is suitable and suffcient. Normally following a serious incident where there is often an element of hindsight bias. No single control or piece of paper will prevent all accidents, regardless of how comprehensive it is.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The solicitor was just doing his job: minimising the sentence for their client. It is hard to tell whether the fact that the company had been “commended “on its H&S 12 years ago was taken into account. As has been noted a) twelve years ago is a long time in H&S and b) it was not clear who did the commending.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.