Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
chris42  
#1 Posted : 08 June 2018 13:41:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Is there any particular standard necessary for vehicle and pedestrian segregation? We are looking to purchase something and wondered if there was a spec we should be asking for.

For background info, the barriers are to make a fixed semi-permanent barrier (in place for about a year to 18 months) on the edge of a car park (ie the cars pull up to the barrier with the pedestrians the other side. The driver would then need to gain access to the walkway (so it can’t be solid between bays). Its only a small car park, 20 cars, 10 on each side parked up to a building one side and a small wall the other side. So, we intend to move the cars away from the wall 1m or so and put a walkway in. I was thinking posts / bollards or similar, but unsure if they need to be able to stop a vehicle or are only necessary to demarcate. I have so far not found out on the internet any particular spec.

Any guidance or standards you can point me towards relating to this would be appreciated. I am aware of HSG 136, which notes use of bollards but not their spec or if they need to stand up to vehicle impact.

Chris

Hsquared14  
#2 Posted : 08 June 2018 13:50:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hsquared14

Hi Chris - not sure how much you want to spend but I'd look at Armco barriers.  They give a defined standard of protection and the shape / design is intended to absorb energy from vehicle impact.  The downside of a bollard is the impact absorption characteristics may not be so good and you could protect your pedestrians at the expense of car drivers and their vehicles.

thanks 1 user thanked Hsquared14 for this useful post.
chris42 on 11/06/2018(UTC)
chris42  
#3 Posted : 08 June 2018 15:27:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Yes we thought about that product, but we need for the car drivers to get out of each car and access the walkway, so it cannot be solid, it needs gaps for accessing the walkway once they get out of the vehicle. The drivers are not going to be allowed to get out of their cars and walk down the central part (max 10 car widths). Not a particularly busy car park, 20 cars all day, a few employees may go out lunch time and a shift change in the afternoon, plus about 20 non-employees may walk through it per day (not park in it). Something you would find most places nothing special.

What I’m not sure about when the guidance states bollards / barrier do they mean they need to (Must) be  strong enough to take a vehicle collision or if they are there to just demarcate the two areas. The internet seems to sell both options, ie something that looks like it could take a hit and something that may struggle with a fat bumble bee. So, is there a norm standard practice when putting such things in place. Studied my local supermarket posts but was not sure if they could take a hit or not.

I would rather sacrifice the people’s vehicles, than the people, but we only rent the property so possibly less damage to the car park the better. I guess the other thing is we will want cars to reverse up against them, so they need to be visible when doing this.

DaveBridle  
#4 Posted : 11 June 2018 07:32:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DaveBridle

Try an internet search for: Chapter 8 of the Department for Transport's Traffic Signs Manual

Also a quick search for Chapter 8 Barriers - this a generic term for the plastic barriers that you find around temporary works etc.

This may provide you with a way forward.

thanks 1 user thanked DaveBridle for this useful post.
chris42 on 11/06/2018(UTC)
Charlie Brown  
#5 Posted : 11 June 2018 19:03:47(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Charlie Brown

A lot of hire companies will supply concrete barriers at a relatively low cost and these can be placed with a gap between each one to admit access for pedestrians to the walkway. These are regularly used on construction sites for the situation you are describing and have an added advantage in that they can't be moved without mechanical assistance.

Edited by user 11 June 2018 19:05:57(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Roundtuit  
#6 Posted : 11 June 2018 19:48:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

If you are having reverse parking just make sure they are visible from a reversing car - our local supermarket just painted its previously high visibilty 3' bollards black in the middle of a sea of black tarmac, interesting to see a rash of flexed and dented bumpers even on the front!

douglas.dick  
#8 Posted : 12 June 2018 07:46:25(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
douglas.dick

In addition to a barrier, I would recomend some 'sleeping policemen', placed at a distance from the barrier. These would be hit before the barrier and felt by the driver when reversing. This would provide the warning that they are getting close to the barrier and still be able to walk over to get to the safety of the segregated walkway. Obviously they would need to be bright colours as they will be trip hazards.

ncann88  
#9 Posted : 12 June 2018 08:43:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
ncann88

Isn't this overkill? As you say there are only 20 cars and they don't move very often. Has someone been run over or hit by a moving car? 

Would it not be easier and cheaper to paint a pathway along the car park similar to how most multi story car parks are set out? A painted path along the line of vehicles each side. This would mean that the potential for people to be crushed between the wall and a vehicle is removed as well. 

A Kurdziel  
#10 Posted : 12 June 2018 08:58:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

You touched on it but we need to be clear: are these barriers intended to simply demarcate the pedestrian and vehicle areas or are they actual crash barriers intended to stop a vehicle driving into pedestrians?

chris42  
#11 Posted : 12 June 2018 10:39:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Originally Posted by: A Kurdziel Go to Quoted Post

You touched on it but we need to be clear: are these barriers intended to simply demarcate the pedestrian and vehicle areas or are they actual crash barriers intended to stop a vehicle driving into pedestrians?

Yes, well it seems that is the question, what is the norm? this is not an unusual situation, why reinvent the wheel.

This type of parking arrangement we currently have with people alighting their cars and just walking down the vehicle access aisle is not deemed good enough and now a walkway is required.

All the above comments are good and match the range of thoughts our company have had. From collision resistant to a simple line painted on the ground (MD’s current choice). The chapter 8 barriers were interesting, but I noted that they were very light (0.9 Kg) and are intended to be linked together to aid stability (also weights hanging from them). Not sure how they would stand up to a collision (also generally a bit long at 2m, there were a couple of 1m ones, but didn’t seem intended for this purpose)

Other barriers / post includes flexible ones which will bend at 90 degrees when hit. The extract below from HSG136 seems to suggest they are only there to set vehicle and pedestrian routes apart ie demarcation

49 Effective ways to keep vehicles away from pedestrian areas, and vice versa,

include:

  • clear markings and signs to set vehicle and pedestrian routes apart;
  • raised kerbs to mark vehicle and pedestrian areas;
  • suitable protective barriers or guard rails, particularly:
  • at the entrances and exits to buildings;
  • at the corners of buildings;
  • to prevent pedestrians from walking straight onto roads, especially from

places where they may not be clearly visible to drivers.

There are thousands of parking areas in the country where there is no barriered walkway or indeed a walkway at all. 

Over the weekend I convinced myself a sturdy barrier was the way to go, but now I’m struggling to find anything convincing that anything more than a painted line is necessary when I see this so many other places.

No we have never had any accidents or near misses as far as we know and some long-time employees 30+ years also cannot remember any issues, from us just using the central aisle.

Thanks all for the input and discussion, quite an interesting range of views.

Chris

martynp1000  
#12 Posted : 12 June 2018 14:22:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
martynp1000

You might like to bring it down to a simple but quantative risk assessment of the current situation and then reflecting the control measures being considered ... is there a significant difference, by implementing physical barriers would you be deterring pedestrians from using the designated path by making it less accessible??

grim72  
#13 Posted : 13 June 2018 07:12:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
grim72

Would the plastic red/white water/sand fillable barriers not be a solution - can be linked together and/or leave gaps between at suitable intervals? Relatively affordable too

Eg: https://www.theworkplacedepot.co.uk/water-filled-barrier?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI-dzw54rQ2wIV55PtCh1LigK7EAYYASABEgKUHPD_BwE#vat?utm_source=google&utm_medium=shopping&utm_campaign=G_Shopping_13_Construction%20and%20Traffic%20Barriers

https://starttraffic.uk/1m-evo-water-filled-barrier?language=en&currency=GBP&campaign=856242160&content=200503130560&keyword=&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI-dzw54rQ2wIV55PtCh1LigK7EAYYAiABEgK8rvD_BwE

chris42  
#14 Posted : 13 June 2018 08:44:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Thanks both. 

Yes, the water filled barriers may be an option although a little low at 555mm, but additional top fence parts can be purchased but increase the price. Currently my MD is refusing point blank to have any form of barrier or post, just a line. I’m going to try and provide a number of options which include barriers (as I think we will be forced down this route anyway).

To be honest I did an assessment which allowed the pedestrian to walk down a marked route in the access aisle, which I now is not ideal, but justified it in the RA due to visibility of both pedestrian and driver. Also, it is the route people would naturally take. It is an old building (at least 50 years) and the car park is not quite wide enough to accommodate the walkway and maintain the parking and 6m access aisle. Therefore, it comes under Regulation 17 (5) which allows for reasonably practicable. If we put a 1m wide walkway down the side the aisle will now be 5m (less depending on the barrier thickness). We did a trial and it requires a larger car to have to shunt 3 or 4 times to get into a space if we have a walkway. The walkway only protects those on the one side? We now have the danger that the pedestrian will be crushed between the vehicle and the wall, unless we have a significant barrier.

Not having looked this close at this particular issue before I found it surprising that the guidance regarding specification of barrier in particular scenarios was negligible (and even less over reg 17(5) ).

Just off to do another site visit and take a few more measurements, but it is possible we may have to get rid of over 50% of the spaces. Which is crazy as they will then have to park on a busy main road.

Chris

grim72  
#15 Posted : 13 June 2018 11:22:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
grim72

I wonder if another option might be to simply install wheel stops as a parking aid rather than full on barriers (a half way house between barriers and line painting and something of use in a car park environment anyway)?

Eg:

https://www.safetybuyer.com/traffic-line-rubber-parking-kerbs-wheel-stops.html?simpleId=11739&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI9KnHnsLQ2wIV4bDtCh29XgkUEAQYAyABEgKj6fD_BwE

https://www.pittmantraffic.co.uk/wheel-stops/parking-blocks.html

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.