Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
baal  
#1 Posted : 10 June 2020 09:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
baal

Hi,

Looking for some guidance on First Aid Recording with the aim of reducing our AIFR. 

Should you only record lost time and reportable injuries, or should you also include all minor injuries i.e. paper cuts, splinters etc. ....what is acceptable?

Is there a time limit on recording a minor injury/accident i.e. 48 or 72hrs after the event........not referring to reportables.

Can you insist that accident reports are only completed by or in the presence of a first aider. 

Many thanks in advance

Kate  
#2 Posted : 10 June 2020 09:39:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

OSHA have got a very prescriptive account of what is considered first aid treatment in the US (as whether treatment is medical or first aid is a criterion in their legal accident recording requirements), so if you want a comprehensive set of criteria to avoid bickering over what counts you could use that.

If your aim is to reduce your accident statistics, then all you need to do is to create obstacles to reporting and recording them, and to punish those who do.

If your aim is to reduce the actual number of accidents, then you should focus on investigating and analysing the accidents and near misses that you have had.  But I expect you know this.

thanks 2 users thanked Kate for this useful post.
CptBeaky on 10/06/2020(UTC), A Kurdziel on 17/07/2020(UTC)
noragilbert  
#3 Posted : 17 July 2020 08:44:16(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
noragilbert

Originally Posted by: Kate Go to Quoted Post

OSHA have got a very prescriptive account of what is considered first aid treatment in the US (as whether treatment is medical or first aid is a criterion in their legal accident recording requirements), so if you want a comprehensive set of criteria to avoid bickering over what counts you could use that.

If your aim is to reduce your accident statistics, then all you need to do is to create obstacles to reporting and recording them, and to punish those who do.

If your aim is to reduce the actual number of accidents, then you should focus on investigating and analysing the accidents and near misses that you have had.  But I expect you know this.

Thanks, that is exactly what I wanted to know.

resume examples

thanks 1 user thanked noragilbert for this useful post.
stevedm on 19/07/2020(UTC)
peter gotch  
#4 Posted : 18 July 2020 14:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

To add to Kate's comment, 5 years after the BP Texas City disaster, OSHA said they were going to start coming down with a ton of bricks on companies that continued to play all the games that enable accident statistics to look "better".

However, those games continue. Saw the report by one multinational following the principles set out by the Global Reporting Inititiave that showed the nice downwards trend in OSHA recordables and hardly mentioned the disaster that had killed nearly 20 in a single incident. Due to the size of the business those fatalities didn't really impact the overall reportable incidence rate.

thanks 2 users thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
stevedm on 19/07/2020(UTC), Kate on 20/07/2020(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.