Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Lindoor  
#1 Posted : 13 February 2025 00:28:55(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Lindoor

I have a small flight of steps with four risers leading from the roof into the escape staircase back into a commercial building with no handrail.

Handrails have been shown to mitigate the hazard of falling whilst on the stairs, and would be seen in industry best practice / guidance.

However, ADK states a “lower standard of provision may be acceptable where access is required only for maintenance, because greater care can be expected from the people requiring to gain access.

 Would welcome your views as to whether I recommend a single handrail as best practice or accept a lower standard of provision,  as the access is required only for maintenance of the roof plant rooms?

pastapickles  
#2 Posted : 13 February 2025 08:42:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pastapickles

If a maintenance worker slipped on the stairs and there was no handrail, the care and attention argument is unlikley to stand up. 

I once had a 5 rise steps with no handrail (so admittly different than your situation) and an employee with 15 years experience fell on these stairs, we couldn't defend it, the solicitors used the standards below and others (which I can't now find).

https://nhbc-standards.co.uk/6-superstructure-excluding-roofs/6-6-staircases/6-6-11-timber-staircases/

Hope this helps.

thanks 1 user thanked pastapickles for this useful post.
peter gotch on 13/02/2025(UTC)
antbruce001  
#3 Posted : 13 February 2025 10:03:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
antbruce001

Under Regulation 12(5) of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations, suitable and sufficient handrails (and, where appropriate, guards) must be provided on all traffic routes that include staircases—except where installing a handrail would obstruct the traffic route.

A staircase is defined as having three or more risers, and the Approved Code of Practice (ACoP) does not make exceptions for maintenance-related staircases.

Additionally, if the staircase forms part of an escape route to a protected staircase, reliance on users exercising caution ("care") is not a valid justification for omitting a handrail.

While Approved Document K (ADK) primarily applies to new buildings and is more relevant to public access areas than workplaces, it can still serve as a useful reference for risk assessment and for determining appropriate design standards when implementing safety improvements.

Given the regulatory requirements and the associated risks, the simplest and most effective solution would be to install a handrail.

Regards, 

Tony.

thanks 3 users thanked antbruce001 for this useful post.
peter gotch on 13/02/2025(UTC), Kate on 13/02/2025(UTC), toe on 13/02/2025(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#4 Posted : 16 February 2025 22:14:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Intersting that a solicitor defending a workplace incident would permit reference to what is in effect a new build insurers standards relevant to home owners rather than work places.

Whilst insurers may wag a lot of health & safety they do not set regulation.

This is the same NHBC currently demanding exposure of their business is removed from agrement certificates which used to cite compliance to building regulation and NHBC standards.

Roundtuit  
#5 Posted : 16 February 2025 22:14:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Intersting that a solicitor defending a workplace incident would permit reference to what is in effect a new build insurers standards relevant to home owners rather than work places.

Whilst insurers may wag a lot of health & safety they do not set regulation.

This is the same NHBC currently demanding exposure of their business is removed from agrement certificates which used to cite compliance to building regulation and NHBC standards.

peter gotch  
#6 Posted : 17 February 2025 11:23:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Morning Roundtuit

pastapickles did say that this was only one of the standards that the solicitor referenced.

I don't see any problem with a legal argument drawing on standards relating to scenarios comparable to that involved in an incident.

Just as a health and safety professional might venture into a sector with which they are not familiar but be able to apply transferable skills and knowledge from other environments - at work AND not.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.