Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
lisar  
#1 Posted : 23 June 2025 15:37:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
lisar

Hi - I have had a colleague challenge an sds as product - screenwash doesnt have any pictograms under CLP. Product states it 61 degrees celcius as flash point but then in section 3 has this info. Is it flammable and hazardous to health or not?  

Chemical name Weight-% REACH registration number
EC No (EU Index No)
Classification according to Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 [CLP]
Specific
concentration
limit (SCL)
M-Factor M-Factor
(long-term)
Ethyl alcohol
64-17-5
5 - <10% 01-2119457610-43-00
00
200-578-6
(603-002-00
-5)
Flam. Liq. 2 (H225)
Eye Irrit. 2 (H319)
- - -
Methanol
67-56-1
0.025 -
<0.25%
01-2119392409-28-00
00
200-659-6
(603-001-00
-X)
Acute Tox. 3 (H301)
Acute Tox. 3 (H311)
Acute Tox. 3 (H331)
STOT SE 1 (H370)
Flam. Liq. 2 (H225)
STOT SE 1 ::
C>=10%
STOT SE 2 ::
3%<=C<10% -

Roundtuit  
#2 Posted : 23 June 2025 15:58:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

What does Section 2 say?

Section 2 is where the supplier of the SDS will provide the classification of the product under supply in this case a screen wash along with the labelling information - Pictogram, Signal Word, Hazard and Precuationary Statements.

Section 3 lists the constituents of the mixture which if you have 10% alcohol then it is likley the remaining unnamed 90% will be water.

Roundtuit  
#3 Posted : 23 June 2025 15:58:38(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

What does Section 2 say?

Section 2 is where the supplier of the SDS will provide the classification of the product under supply in this case a screen wash along with the labelling information - Pictogram, Signal Word, Hazard and Precuationary Statements.

Section 3 lists the constituents of the mixture which if you have 10% alcohol then it is likley the remaining unnamed 90% will be water.

lisar  
#4 Posted : 23 June 2025 16:01:48(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
lisar

Originally Posted by: Roundtuit Go to Quoted Post

What does Section 2 say?

Section 2 is where the supplier of the SDS will provide the classification of the product under supply in this case a screen wash along with the labelling information - Pictogram, Signal Word, Hazard and Precuationary Statements.

Section 3 lists the constituents of the mixture which if you have 10% alcohol then it is likley the remaining unnamed 90% will be water.


Hi Roundtuit

SECTION 2: Hazards identification
2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
This mixture is classified as not hazardous according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 [CLP]
2.2. Label elements
This mixture is classified as not hazardous according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 [CLP]
Hazard statements
This mixture is classified as not hazardous according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 [CLP]
Precautionary Statements - EU (§28, 1272/2008)
P101 - If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand.
P102 - Keep out of reach of children.
P501 - Dispose of contents/ container in accordance with national regulations.
Labelling for contents according to regulation (EC) No. 648/2004
Unknown aquatic toxicity Contains 0.065 % of components with unknown hazards to the aquatic environment.
2.3. Other hazards
No information available.
Endocrine Disruptor Information This product does not contain any known or suspected endocrine disruptors

Edited by user 23 June 2025 16:06:13(UTC)  | Reason: .

Roundtuit  
#5 Posted : 23 June 2025 17:10:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

So the classification as stated is "not hazardous to health" and has no "physical hazard" i.e. not flammable.

Even when Methanol is mentioned its concentration is below the specific concentration limits required to trigger a classification.

That Section 3 information is about the individual substances each considered as 100% constituent.

Roundtuit  
#6 Posted : 23 June 2025 17:10:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

So the classification as stated is "not hazardous to health" and has no "physical hazard" i.e. not flammable.

Even when Methanol is mentioned its concentration is below the specific concentration limits required to trigger a classification.

That Section 3 information is about the individual substances each considered as 100% constituent.

peter gotch  
#7 Posted : 24 June 2025 11:00:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
peter gotch

Hi lisar

Perhaps your colleague remembers one or more of the myths that circulated during early Covid about hand sanitiser going bang.

Hand sanitiser typically has a MUCH higher alcohol content than a typical screenwash you buy from the petrol station, supermarket etc and all the myths about sanitiser were quickly debunked but with the debunking being less well publicised than the spread of the myths on social media.

So, your SDS is effectively saying 

1. Don't drink this! - and if you do take the label with you to A&E.

2. If you get it on your hands, think about washing it off.

3. .....and implicitly it says that it's OK to let it get into the drains UNLESS you were to distill it to remove the water and up to mix of alcohols in the product.

thanks 1 user thanked peter gotch for this useful post.
Martin Fieldingt on 24/06/2025(UTC)
stevedm  
#8 Posted : 04 July 2025 07:46:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevedm

mmm...

Is it Flammable?

  • Ethyl alcohol (Ethanol):
    • Present at 5–<10%.
    • Classification: Flam. Liq. 2 (H225) (Highly flammable liquid and vapour).
    • Flash Point: 61°C (from your product SDS).
    • CLP’s flammable liquid categories are:
      • Category 2: Flash point <23°C.
      • Category 3: Flash point ≥23°C and ≤60°C.
    • At 61°C, this product would not be classified as flammable under CLP. The flash point is just above the cut-off for classification (Category 3 ends at 60°C).
  • Methanol:
    • Present at 0.025–<0.25%.
    • Classification: Flam. Liq. 2 (H225), but at such low levels it does not drive the product’s classification.

Conclusion on Flammability:

This screenwash does not require a flammable pictogram under CLP as its flash point is just above the threshold and the ethanol content isn’t high enough to drive classification. That’s why the SDS and label have no flammable symbol.

 

thanks 1 user thanked stevedm for this useful post.
WatsonD on 04/07/2025(UTC)
Syed Zain Ud Din  
#9 Posted : 04 July 2025 18:56:40(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Syed Zain Ud Din

Originally Posted by: lisar Go to Quoted Post

Hi - I have had a colleague challenge an sds as product - screenwash doesnt have any pictograms under CLP. Product states it 61 degrees celcius as flash point but then in section 3 has this info. Is it flammable and hazardous to health or not?  

Chemical name Weight-% REACH registration number
EC No (EU Index No)
Classification according to Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 [CLP]
Specific
concentration
limit (SCL)
M-Factor M-Factor
(long-term)
Ethyl alcohol
64-17-5
5 - <10% 01-2119457610-43-00
00
200-578-6
(603-002-00
-5)
Flam. Liq. 2 (H225)
Eye Irrit. 2 (H319)
- - -
Methanol
67-56-1
0.025 -
<0.25%
01-2119392409-28-00
00
200-659-6
(603-001-00
-X)
Acute Tox. 3 (H301)
Acute Tox. 3 (H311)
Acute Tox. 3 (H331)
STOT SE 1 (H370)
Flam. Liq. 2 (H225)
STOT SE 1 ::
C>=10%
STOT SE 2 ::
3%<=C<10% -

Hi lisar,

Thanks for sharing this. Just a quick question—was the SDS issued recently and in compliance with the latest CLP regulations? I’m wondering if the absence of pictograms might be due to outdated classification or borderline concentration thresholds.

Would be good to confirm the version date.

Roundtuit  
#10 Posted : 05 July 2025 08:58:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Originally Posted by: Syed Zain Ud Din Go to Quoted Post

Thanks for sharing this. Just a quick question—was the SDS issued recently and in compliance with the latest CLP regulations? I’m wondering if the absence of pictograms might be due to outdated classification or borderline concentration thresholds.

Would be good to confirm the version date.

If your bot were any good it would have spotted the information provided by the OP was current according to CLP.

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
peter gotch on 05/07/2025(UTC), peter gotch on 05/07/2025(UTC)
Roundtuit  
#11 Posted : 05 July 2025 08:58:07(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Roundtuit

Originally Posted by: Syed Zain Ud Din Go to Quoted Post

Thanks for sharing this. Just a quick question—was the SDS issued recently and in compliance with the latest CLP regulations? I’m wondering if the absence of pictograms might be due to outdated classification or borderline concentration thresholds.

Would be good to confirm the version date.

If your bot were any good it would have spotted the information provided by the OP was current according to CLP.

thanks 2 users thanked Roundtuit for this useful post.
peter gotch on 05/07/2025(UTC), peter gotch on 05/07/2025(UTC)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.