Rank: Forum user
|
BS 5975‑1:2024 has a requirement for an Inspection and Test Plan.
Does anyone have any experience of how this is implemented on site?
Is there usually an Inspection and Test Plan form that's completed?
Or is it part of the design specifications? Or included in the temp works register?
Ideally, in your opinion, is a separate form preferred?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Originally Posted by: karoloydi  BS 5975‑1:2024 has a requirement for an Inspection and Test Plan.
Does anyone have any experience of how this is implemented on site?
Is there usually an Inspection and Test Plan form that's completed?
Or is it part of the design specifications? Or included in the temp works register?
Ideally, in your opinion, is a separate form preferred? From site experience, the Inspection and Test Plan (ITP) required by BS 5975-1:2024 is usually implemented as a separate, controlled document, rather than being hidden inside other records. In practice, the ITP sets out what inspections and checks are required, when they take place, who is responsible, and what acceptance criteria apply for temporary works activities. It is normally prepared during the planning stage, before construction starts, and then followed on site. Most sites use a standard ITP form or template. This allows inspections to be recorded clearly and provides evidence that temporary works are being managed correctly. The form usually links to: Design drawings and calculations Method statements Risk assessments Hold points (e.g. before pour, before loading, before striking)
While the design specification may reference the need for inspections and testing, it usually does not replace the ITP. The design tells you what is required, but the ITP explains how and when compliance will be checked on site. The temporary works register normally only tracks the status of temporary works (design issued, approved, erected, loaded, struck, etc.). It is not detailed enough to act as an ITP. However, the register should reference the relevant ITP, so there is a clear audit trail. Ideally, a separate ITP is preferred. It provides clarity, improves site control, and makes it much easier to demonstrate compliance with BS 5975-1:2024 during audits or investigations. Keeping it as a standalone document also avoids confusion between design control and site inspection records.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks for your help! Would you say that ITP is also required, even if there is very basic low risk standard design temporary works on site, like Heras Fencing?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Unfortunately Murad Ullah is a recent poster to these forums and follows the format of an AI bot - quote the OP, rephrase the question as an answer, apply bold text to key words |& phrases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Unfortunately Murad Ullah is a recent poster to these forums and follows the format of an AI bot - quote the OP, rephrase the question as an answer, apply bold text to key words |& phrases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.