Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Fun Police  
#1 Posted : 04 April 2011 20:49:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Fun Police

Apart from carbon dioxide and chlorobromomethane do you of another suitable gas that can be used as an inert gas suitable as a explosion suppressant in a confined space?
paul mc  
#2 Posted : 04 April 2011 21:22:35(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
paul mc

thats an extremely open question
relevant to what situation and what is it suppressing as differing chemical have differing L.E.L`s and U.E.L`s
teh_boy  
#3 Posted : 05 April 2011 08:20:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
teh_boy

Any of the Nobel gases?
Nitrogen?


firesafety101  
#4 Posted : 05 April 2011 10:03:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Have you thought of water mist? Not a gas but very effective as it reduces the oxygen content.
Ken Slack  
#5 Posted : 05 April 2011 10:20:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ken Slack

Argon, Halon??
saifakbar  
#6 Posted : 05 April 2011 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
saifakbar

why another gas?
why not purging with water or stem? may be helpful to remove hazard form confined space.should be quantify through RA.

Regard

Saif
colinreeves  
#7 Posted : 05 April 2011 13:46:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
colinreeves

In shipping the methods have been:

Steam (in the days when most ships were steam propelled)
CO2 - still current, but takes up a lot of storage space
Halons - I think fully phased out now, if not, soon will be
Hi-ex foam - current
water mist - current

Mick Noonan  
#8 Posted : 05 April 2011 14:01:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Mick Noonan

Calvin, what is an explosion suppressant and how does it work!?! I'm intrigued. If you use it on confined space then surely you are introducing a new problem due to there being no oxygen in there for people to work? Is it that it's heavier than air and will sit there preventing oxygen from becoming part of an explosion?

I do know of specialised chemicals (FM200 etc) that are used in electrical rooms to "absorb" energy in the event of fire.

more detail please.
SteveL  
#9 Posted : 05 April 2011 16:45:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SteveL

Calvin

Why would you want to use something that has such a low PPM usage and a R59 phrase

This product has been banned by the NFPA since 1969, I know UK is behind USA but even so.
Salvar  
#10 Posted : 05 April 2011 21:50:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Salvar

Greetings, Calvin.

I agree with what's been said so far about haloalkanes.

By explosion suppressant, I guess you are talking about talking about preventing a runaway reaction. In which case, keeping the concentrations above or below the flammable limits is the way to do it (preferably below for obvious reasons!). You could also think about refrigeration to reduce the evaporation rate and therefore the concentration in the space above (I'm assuming) the liquid. Another way might be to have a travelling top to reduce volume of the space above the surface.

In addition to the gases mentioned, if purity of the protected substance is not an issue, diesel exhaust can be a cheap, albeit dirty, inerting gas.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.