Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
buzzz  
#1 Posted : 28 April 2011 15:51:03(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
buzzz

Does anyone here work in reactive maintenance or roofing industry? I am looking to see how others manage working at height activities for unplanned / reactive roofing jobs, e.g. loose tiles etc, where obviously falls need to be prevented against but the job is only short. Thanks
RayRapp  
#2 Posted : 28 April 2011 16:59:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

For this type of work either a generic RA and/or supplemented with a DRA. Some while back I did a DRA for a company specialising in domestic roof work. It is probably the best form of protection for the worker and the employer if correctly used and, of course, roof work can be very dangerous. Notwithstanding that, good training, equipment and supervision should not be discounted.
buzzz  
#3 Posted : 28 April 2011 22:42:10(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
buzzz

Hi RR, thanks for your reply. I was looking more along the lines of physical controls to prevent falls or reduce distance etc. Not sure DRA is sufficient enough without the actual fall prevention is it? (genuine question, not being funny)
Guru  
#4 Posted : 28 April 2011 23:05:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Guru

RayRapp  
#5 Posted : 29 April 2011 00:26:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

JWatts Yes you are right, some physical restraints would be required with roof work. The type of fall/edge protection would depend on the work, type of roof and how it will be accessed, there is not a one size fits all approach which can be adopted for working at height. Some organisations operate a permit system for more hazardous work which might be worth investigating. Whatever measures are adopted a competent person still needs to assess the work for the potential risks.
buzzz  
#6 Posted : 04 May 2011 12:13:19(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
buzzz

Thanks Guru for links. Ray - the difficulty of fall / edge protection on quick jobs is the cost and time of putting it up for something which takes 15 minutes. Which I know is no defence at all for WAH risks. What does anyone else do?
Ron Hunter  
#7 Posted : 04 May 2011 13:15:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Too many variables to attempt a reply here (roof type/ pitch, presence of fragile elements, proximity to edge, height, falling materials, weather factors, condition of surfaces, etc. etc.) but why not check out relevant Industry Guidance? Here's a good place to start: Health and Safety Guidance at: http://www.nfrc.co.uk/default.aspx?docID=322 There is comfort to be derived in complying with Industry Good/Best Practice!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.