Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Nic Forsdike (Fozzie  
#1 Posted : 25 May 2011 21:27:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Nic Forsdike (Fozzie)

I work in the events industry and the use of FLT & Telihandlers with man cages, (non integrated) is common practice. I am aware of PM28 and the strategic review, not quite certain where the advice lies now, as this is not a construction and the use of MEWP introduces more hazards than it removes.

I have suggested, SSOW, 6 month LOLER, Fall restraint harness, and regular inspection of cage etc, agreed comms between drive and person in the cage and driver to have appropriate FLT certificates of competency.

Any advice
Goodwin39847  
#2 Posted : 25 May 2011 22:14:07(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Goodwin39847

We currently run a fleet of telehandlers on construction sites and will only have man cages on site if all other means are exhausted, as the guidance note stipulates variable reach trucks (telehandlers) cannot have a reach of above 6mtrs if one is attached I don't think this just applies to construction. If we were to use one it would have to go through the correct planning process with all operatives and personnel trained (CPCS or better) in use of attachment and truck also no more than 1200 restraint harness with training on use and inspection.
6 months LOLER on the attachment and the truck daily checksheets with failsafe checked tilt mechanism locked sufficient communication this goes on and on, PM28 is a guidance from HSE as good as or better so be careful when using.

Let me know if you need more info will be glad to pass it on.
Corfield35303  
#3 Posted : 26 May 2011 16:55:11(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Corfield35303

Hi Fozzie,

I think you answered your own question with this being 'common practice', use of cages and platforms on FLT's and the such like are supposed to be infrequent (well, PM28 points to that anyway), least preferred options, even with locks, anti-tilt mechanisms and fall restraint etc. There are other integrated platforms besides MEWP's that could be hired or bought that would be much more appropriate, good for rough ground, need fewer people, can be used indoors or are transportable. If its just once in a blue moon then just use a FLT, absolutely it must be locked to the forks, and have a physical barrier to tilting as well as the other good things you mention.

If its 'common practice' then I'd suggest an alternative......

PM me if you like as this was a challenge in a recent job.
Oldroyd19659  
#4 Posted : 26 May 2011 23:07:26(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Oldroyd19659

Fozzie

Agree with Corfield about alternatives however if you press on with cages (your perogitive) i would also suggest pre use operator checklist of salient parts of the cage/flt interface and any other safety related item/system.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.