Rank: Super forum user
|
I have a very simple question - is the ASL still valid or has annexe VI of CLP superceded it?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Oops! APPROVED SUPPLY LIST!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Pikey,
You just beat me to it as I was about to ask the same question. I don't know about you but I find it useful for cross referencing REACH related questions.
Badger
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
As I understand it the Approved Supply List is no longer valid. However, the transitional arrangements for CLP regulations appear to allow the continued use of risk phrases, although hazard statements according to CLP should be used as well. Confused? Having spent a long time studying the CLP regulations so am I!
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There's a transitional period for CLP right now.
Substances (materials made up of a single chemical entity) have to be classified, labelled and packed using CLP (since last December) and so the ASL (which gave action to part of the dangerous substances directive) is no longer relevant.
Preparations (now called mixtures) can be classified, labelled or packed using either the CHIP requirements as per the Dangerous Preparations Directive OR using CLP, until 2015 when they must all be as per CLP. However they must still have a CHIP classification until 2015 even if packed and labelled according to CLP.
CLP uses the UN Globally Harmonised System (GHS) of classification and so there is no longer a need for ASL. HSE even say so on their website http://www.hse.gov.uk/chip/issues.htm#asl
Yes the legislation on this makes me very glad that I'm only looking at it as a downstream user and not someone who has to classify materials or write SDS!
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.