Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
DP  
#1 Posted : 08 August 2011 13:02:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

Ron Hunter  
#2 Posted : 08 August 2011 13:27:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

The injured party will now need considerable support (financial and otherwise) following this tragic incident, and this probably explains why this particular legal remedy was attempted.
The harsh facts and reality of life are of course as per the judgement.
Canopener  
#3 Posted : 08 August 2011 19:33:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

This is another of those horribly tragic cases ( see Tomlinson/Congleton) where a momentary lapse or a ’moment of madness’ has such dreadfully profound consequences, Who can blame them for trying to seek some ‘recourse’ to assist them with the rest of their lives? As Ron says, they are going to need lots of support for the rest of their lives.

The judgement appears ’sound’ to me. I attended a case once and the judge was really ’kind’ to the lady that had taken the case against us. The judge acknowledged that she had received quite a nasty injury (not life changing or anything of the scale being discussed here) but the judge concluded that it wasn’t due to negligence on ‘our’ part, but was in fact her own fault.

We sometimes have to take responsibility for our own actions, we all make mistakes, but thank God few have such tragic consequences as this case.
Clairel  
#4 Posted : 08 August 2011 19:54:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

I disagree Phil. I do blame them for trying to seek compensation. They got drunk, they tried to slide down the bannister and they were subsequently injured. Why would they make a claim against anyone? That is a waste of court time and distressing for all involved for no good reason.

I think what is wrong is the fact that so many people feel they are owed financial compensation for something that was their own fault. Tragic that she is disabled but essentially her own fault. We all have to take the consequences of our own actions and it shouldn't be so easy to take someone to court for damages when there is no foundation for that claim.

The right judgement but it should never have been allowed to go to court in the first place.
RayRapp  
#5 Posted : 08 August 2011 20:48:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I suspect the injured person went to court because she was advised or coerced by our legal fraternity ie an accident claims lawyer, possibly on a no win no fee?

I have not had much experience dealing with accident claims but recently a friend of mine asked me to provide an overview of an accident claim where a lady golfer injured herself whilst retrieving her golf ball from a ditch. The letter sent by the lawyer was very aggressive and implied guilt at every juncture. The request for information was quite staggering. I can't remember all the details but, RAs, re-assessed RAs following the incident, evidence of this and that. The upshot was that the lady golfer was an ex captain of the club and she was coerced into putting in a claim!

Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.