Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Muiryden  
#1 Posted : 11 August 2011 13:37:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Muiryden

Just read about this in the HSE weekly newsletter.

http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/newsletter.htm .

A bit concerning: enforced consultancy at £133 per hour.

Obviously if you are not breaking any laws then you will be OK.

I would welcome any other views on this new "service".
leadbelly  
#2 Posted : 11 August 2011 13:58:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
leadbelly

Muiryden  
#3 Posted : 11 August 2011 14:01:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Muiryden

Many thanks Leadbelly, I searched under "intervention" and didn't see anything relevant.
jde  
#4 Posted : 11 August 2011 14:03:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jde

It would be interesting to see the breakdown as to how they came to the figure. I'm not too awre of many inspectors earning that sort of salary! The crux being the wording of material breaches not technical. We have been warned
chris.packham  
#5 Posted : 11 August 2011 14:11:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

The £133 hourly rate is intended to cover all costs, e.g. officec costs, e.g. for office based personnel involved, cost of producing letters, etc. not just the HSE inspector's time.

Incidentally, the estimated cost for an Improvement Notice is shown in the consultative document as £1500 and the associated documentation to the consultative document states that the HSE expects to recover £43.6 million in the first year. You can work it out. That represents an awful lot of INs!

I also wonder what the effect on the relationship between employers and the HSE will be. The HSE may claim that this will not result in a drive to ensure they meet the financial target by looking for reasons to charge, but will it be seen in the same light by employers. Or will employers now start to see the HSE more in the light of "the enemy" in the same way that many perceive the taxs authorities?

Chris
Muiryden  
#6 Posted : 11 August 2011 14:21:31(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Muiryden

This is exactly my feeling, RIDDOR reporting will reduce as this is often the "invitation" to visit. Focus will be away from an open and honest relationship where both parties move forward together to improve performance. If the focus is all about money then I think I am missing something.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.