Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
decimomal  
#1 Posted : 04 November 2011 09:30:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
decimomal

Lifting equipment requires thorough examination and testing by a competent person. This person should be independent and not be the person who who performs the routine maintenance. Apart from via the insurer, how would an employer identify a competent person to carry out the examination? Thank you.
HSSnail  
#2 Posted : 04 November 2011 09:44:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
HSSnail

Decimomal If you read the associated guidance on loler the "independence" of the competent person is an arguable term. The person can be employed by the same company operating the equipment but must be shown to have the genuine authority and independence to ensure that examinations are carried out properly. Not easy to achieve I agree. Another alternative is to use a company that provides a service or maintenance function. Again you have to ensure no conflict of interest but many companies do it.
David Bannister  
#3 Posted : 04 November 2011 09:44:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

Quotation from indg339: Thorough examination and testing of lifts: Simple guidance for lift owners: Accreditation by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service to the relevant standard (BS EN 45004) is an indication of the competence of an inspection body. However, the quoted standard is now obsolete but UKAS is still operational and publishes lists of Inspection Bodies: http://www.ukas.com/Abou...ction-body-schedules.asp
bob youel  
#4 Posted : 04 November 2011 11:05:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

"""How would an employer identify a competent person to carry out the examination?""" The employer needs to establish that the person has the relevant training, experience, know how, personal trait's, independence rank etc. in the particular area that is being evaluated. Which means, in most cases, that the guy on the shop floor whilst OK in many areas may not be competent to undertale the activity properly so the employer may have to go to the specialists e.g the insurer noting that competence can be gained but it usually takes time
horner.d  
#5 Posted : 04 November 2011 11:26:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
horner.d

LOLER-98 ACOP Paragraph 249 Competent person – “You should ensure that the person carrying out a thorough examination has such appropriate practical and theoretical knowledge and experience of the lifting equipment to be thoroughly examined as will enable them to detect defects or weaknesses and to assess their importance in relation to the safety and continued use of the lifting equipment”. So if your guy (I’m assuming you mean a qualified Technician or Engineer) on the Shop Floor is such and is familiar with the equipment to be examined i.e. from a mechanical, electrical, electronic, hydraulic etc point of view then your guy could carry out the Thorough Examination.
Reed21854  
#6 Posted : 04 November 2011 16:57:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Reed21854

We use an external company for inspecting our fork lifts, tail lifts, pallet trucks, passenger lift and genies, this is done via our insurance company. But we use internal engineers for inspecting hoists, chain hoists and lifting kit (rope and tackle) used on site. I agree with the previous posts in relation to competence. If you have someone within the organisation with qualifications, knowledge of the kit and practical experience then they can inspect equipment and accessories.
decimomal  
#7 Posted : 04 November 2011 16:58:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
decimomal

Thank you all for the responses. Bon Weekend.
alistair.r.reid  
#8 Posted : 04 November 2011 23:19:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
alistair.r.reid

Reed21854 wrote:
We use an external company for inspecting our fork lifts, tail lifts, pallet trucks, passenger lift and genies, this is done via our insurance company. But we use internal engineers for inspecting hoists, chain hoists and lifting kit (rope and tackle) used on site. I agree with the previous posts in relation to competence. If you have someone within the organisation with qualifications, knowledge of the kit and practical experience then they can inspect equipment and accessories.
This is correct however two other issues need to be satisfied to comply with LOLER; - Firstly to make a Report of Thorough Examination in accordance with schedule 1 of LOLER and - Secondly that they have the authority and independence to send a copy of that report to the enforcing authority if it presents an imminent danger of causing serious injury to persons.
alistair.r.reid  
#9 Posted : 05 November 2011 00:51:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
alistair.r.reid

Decimomal wrote:
Lifting equipment requires thorough examination and testing by a competent person. This person should be independent and not be the person who who performs the routine maintenance. Apart from via the insurer, how would an employer identify a competent person to carry out the examination?
The safety assessment federation (Safed) represents the UK independent engineering inspection and certification industry full details of there members are available at http://safed.co.uk/home/
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.