Rank: Forum user
|
Hello All
Would anyone offer options to reduce sickness levels in large call centres? Sickness figures are available and are wide ranging.
I am looking to put together a reasonably comprehensive package to cover anything from respiratory, WRULD, bad backs, headaches, stress etc.
Any suggestions gratefully recieved.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This is a wide ranging topic with little or no information upon which to base a response. Call centres come in many sizes and styles. Call centres generally operate using computers and with the exception of respiratory problems should be considered when undertaking DSE assessments. As for respiratory problems you need to look at the cleanliness of the air in the call centre. I know of very few cases of respiratory problems being a major issue. Perhaps more info may lead to a better response.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
clive, are you sure the sickness levels or (absenteeism) even (truly) relate to health / wellbeing?
As for options to reduce sickness levels, I'd go for:
no sick pay;
better hourly rate;
improve recruitment selection... etc.
(how sympathetic I am)!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
http://www.qrc.org.au/co...upl/03_spk013_Scanes.pdf
always found that some of the better guidance in this area comes from Oz...
This is only a general link from some research I did a while back...I will dig into my 1Tbyte drive and see what else I can dig up..
what are your key areas from the sickness stats?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Calls centres are notoriously difficult environments for people and without more information on the levels and types of sickness it is difficult to make a call (no pun intended). That said, I would be interested in discussing absenteeism with staff representatives and supervisors - a workshop. Staff are possibly unhappy with working conditions in general and any improvements by the management may raise morale and at the same time reduce sickness levels.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Its probably stress that has brought on the other areas so try to look at that area first
My relative managed a large call center some time ago where attendance, office staff atmosphere and performance was very good ---- a new business with many new managers took over and whilst the basic mechanical environment was very good; new building, desks, computers etc absence shot up and moral dropped to floor level because all the new management team were concerned about were targets - my relative resigned as did many of the older management team
Targets; usually set by those who do not need to hit them, are big problems in many such businesses and the people recruited must be of the right mental type as many today are forced into such work as there are few alternatives so take what job they can get this means that management should recruit properly in the first place
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
cliveg wrote:Hello All
Would anyone offer options to reduce sickness levels in large call centres? Sickness figures are available and are wide ranging.
I am looking to put together a reasonably comprehensive package to cover anything from respiratory, WRULD, bad backs, headaches, stress etc.
Any suggestions gratefully received.
Open-plan floor-space.
Usually poor ventilation, hence rapid spread of infectious diseases like common cold and influenza.
Allied to stress caused by pressure to "sell" etc.
Recipe for resolution of problem:
No sick pay (more stress, plus ill staff coming to work and spreading disease)
Threaten to end contract (more stress, plus ill staff coming to work and spreading disease)
Etc
Etc
I suggest a large sign on the office wall:
STAFF FAILING TO COME TO WORK WHEN ILL WILL BE SUBJECT TO INQUISITION, TORTURE AND DISMISSAL.
What was that about moral ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Clive
I would support Ray's point.
While it is some time since I dealt with call centres the more common problems raised related to work organisation. If those fielding the calls and those supervising them could be given a chance to identify how the work looks to them, measures to reduce sickness absence may be found.
As with most problems that have work organisation at their centre this tends to offer challenges, some to employees, most to managers. Professor Lofstedt found enough scientific evidence to conclude that:
'Boosting the responsibility and involvement of employees has the potential to bring about significant improvements in health and safety in the workplace.'
Indeed such was the scale of the 'significant improvements' that the learned Professor recommended absolutely nothing to assist improve the current situation: the HSE estimate that 60% of employees are not consulted about health and safety issues they should be by law.
People support what they help create. If the workers have some say in developing systems that may help reduce sickness absence, they may be more willing to abide by the rules.
Cheers.
Nigel
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks everyone for the ideas put forward here. Apologies for not being able to go into more detail on this open forum, but you have been most helpful.
Best wishes
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There are two approaches to the absence problems you refer to that have not been mentioned but which reliable research indicates are relatively effective.
One is a method of coaching known as 'appreciative coaching', and in particular the technique known as 'feedforward'. If you learn this method and teach it to first-line managers, you are likely to change the social climate in major ways that enable you to get to grips with many of the root problems.
The other is a psychometric assessment measure called 'Dependability and Safety Instrument', published by SHL Limited, since 2005. Based on extensive research in four continents over the past 8 years, it reveals risk levels about dependability of employees and candidates. While you need to be qualified to use it, it may well be a far more cost-effective measure than any other option. (If you trial it and find it useful, you can also train and qualify to use it).
By applying either of these measures on their own, you are likely to reduce patterns of absence over six months by over 50%. If you use both of them for at least nine months, you are likely to reduce your levels of absence in the order of 85%.
Often the main barrier to an innovative solution of this kind is the confusion in the safety professional community in the UK between 'behavioural safety' and more tailored, situation-specific forms of research-based, reliable and valid psychological intervention.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.