Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
SBH  
#1 Posted : 09 February 2012 15:55:06(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
SBH

We have several server rooms which have FM 200 systems installed and have done for several years. I have now received a quote for remedial works from a contractor and phew it is large. My questions are as follows: FM 200 is not especially dangerous therefore would an extraction system be needed to vent off the gases if activated - I think not, the atmosphere although uncomfortable is still breathable for most people, should it be allowed to vent off naturally? Would a pressure relief valve be needed due to pressures involved - potential implosion of walls? Any help / advice on any of the above would be greatly appreciated Thanks Steve
stevedm  
#2 Posted : 09 February 2012 16:38:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevedm

Steve The product depending on the volumes can cause oxygen depletion by it's very nature and also possible arrhythmias (heart problems). It isn't known to be toxic but carries all the same risks as CO2, N2 and halon (excluding the environmental bit) Depending on your operating pressures yes it should have pressure relief.. Sounds like you have a competent contractor there...who installed it? bet it was the same guy... :)
imwaldra  
#3 Posted : 10 February 2012 10:17:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
imwaldra

Are you sure there's a significant risk and that you really need a fire suppressant? In the early years of server rooms it became normal to fit halon systems but all the data I've seen (some time back I admit) showed that major loss events were almost non-existent, so in many cases the halon systems were removed and not replaced by an alternative. Obviously it's the potential business interruption that needs to be assessed, but by how much would it be lessened if the system is activated? Would the electical fault protection limit signifcant damage anyway? I no longer have access to the data which would provide answers but do suggest you reassess the fire risks before committed to significant expenditure on protection.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.