Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
ahoskins  
#1 Posted : 21 February 2012 11:40:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ahoskins

Erudite colleagues, Our buildings are not situated within a radon affected area, but we tested for it anyway and found levels of exposure around half of the annual limit in one of our buildings. During a second period of monitoring one detector recorded a level just above the annual limit but seasonally corrected this came out as 2.5 times the annual exposure limit. Yet another period of monitoring and the levels are back down, but with one detector recording half the limit in an area above the original basement area which was monitored. My first thoughts were that the radon was emanating from the mass concrete structure, but now I have a problem with that as the latest monitoring reports a higher level of gas in an area which is physically higher than the basement and since radon is considerably heavier than air I would not have expected it to be present at a higher level than within the physically lower location adjacent. The only change which has taken place during these periods is the removal of some equipment from the lower area (redundant pc monitors, telephones and cables) which was temporarily stored in the upper area before disposal... Finally my question! Is there any possibility whatsoever that such equipment could potentially contain materials that might emit radon gas? As you can tell (probably) I am now clutching at straws! Many thanks Alan
Safety Smurf  
#2 Posted : 21 February 2012 13:22:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Hi Alan, I don't profess to be an expert in this field but I'm sure Radon meters actually measure radioactivity (in becquerels) rather than radon gas quantity per se. It stands to reason therefore that anything else that gives off radioactivity might effect the reading. However, I'm willing to be corrected if I'm wrong.
A Kurdziel  
#3 Posted : 21 February 2012 13:28:29(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Contact the HPA they ARE the radon experts. They like this sort of mystery. See http://www.hpa.org.uk/
ahoskins  
#4 Posted : 21 February 2012 13:33:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ahoskins

Thanks both I might do that AK Yes SS - BQ/m3 (half life of uranium apparently) That reminded me of the old BT Trimphone with radioactive glow-in-the-dark dial... Fine until they stored wads of them in a warehouse... but I digress. I am a little surprised that if the detectors are susceptible to other forms of ionising radiation it is not mentioned by the supplier. A
Safety Smurf  
#5 Posted : 21 February 2012 13:49:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

ahoskins wrote:
Thanks both I might do that AK Yes SS - BQ/m3 (half life of uranium apparently) That reminded me of the old BT Trimphone with radioactive glow-in-the-dark dial... Fine until they stored wads of them in a warehouse... but I digress. I am a little surprised that if the detectors are susceptible to other forms of ionising radiation it is not mentioned by the supplier. A
They weren't placed in a warehouse full of smoke detectors were they? ;-)
ahoskins  
#6 Posted : 21 February 2012 14:47:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
ahoskins

Now! Now! it isn't Friday yet! It was fairly local to me - Cwmbran I think...
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.