Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Lawlee45239  
#1 Posted : 28 February 2012 09:46:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Morning all,

I am wondering if anyone can advise me as to the name of the attachment that you put on the keys of machinery and affix to your waist so you have to remove the keys each time you get off/ out of that piece of machinery.

Thanks in advance
chris42  
#2 Posted : 28 February 2012 11:12:25(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

So you mean something that holds the keys, is retractable and clips to a belt ? So how about a retractable key belt clip (Google it).
Lawlee45239  
#3 Posted : 28 February 2012 11:28:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

chris42 wrote:
So you mean something that holds the keys, is retractable and clips to a belt ? So how about a retractable key belt clip (Google it).


I did, but its not what I want, I dont want retractable as I feel that would be a pain, and may get broke. More a bungie cord type thing, I know there is something on the market, but just cannot think of the name....

and if there isnt ye better all sod off, its my idea, and seen as you were the only one to reply Chris42 I'll give you 15% of the company!!!!
Ant Elsmore  
#4 Posted : 28 February 2012 12:37:15(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Ant Elsmore

Key chain or lanyard
Ron Hunter  
#5 Posted : 28 February 2012 12:49:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Hmmm....usual reference is a lanyard attached to a dead man's switch, such as you'll find on jet skis and the like. Obvious idea is that the thing pulls out with minimal effort and kills the power.
Not sure I'd go with anything more substantial than that, you'll injure your waist, break the key, or possibly both! You'll need a switch interface specifically designed for that purpose.
Graham Bullough  
#6 Posted : 28 February 2012 12:56:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

How about piece of string alias cord ?!!! I've long had a loop of nylon cord attached to my house & car keys so that I can secure them to my trouser belt or rucsack as and when necessary. Have done this for decades ever since losing a car key during an outdoor activity and then spending time trying to find it. For strength and durability use a double fisherman's knot for the loop. :-)

Lawlee45239  
#7 Posted : 28 February 2012 13:09:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

regarding post 3, I had said that was not what I was looking for and if there were no such thing on the market then I would produce one...but it got removed
chris42  
#8 Posted : 28 February 2012 13:10:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris42

Sorry I was under the impression that you wanted something that when an operative got out of, say a FLT, that they had to take the keys with them (security of FLT). Not something that stop the FTL if there was an accident.

The Google search I suggested gave me :- the advert below (name removed) for £17.95. I guessing from the removed reply that I was wrong (I wonder what it said)

Retractable Key Holder fits all belts up to 55mm. It comes with a commercial 1200mm tough nylon coated Kevlar cord and polycarbonate case with ball-socket weight support - ideal for heavy key bunches/small tools, etc. The keys lock in place, which stops them bouncing up and down on the sprung cord.
Lawlee45239  
#9 Posted : 28 February 2012 13:12:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Graham Bullough wrote:
How about piece of string alias cord ?!!! I've long had a loop of nylon cord attached to my house & car keys so that I can secure them to my trouser belt or rucsack as and when necessary. Have done this for decades ever since losing a car key during an outdoor activity and then spending time trying to find it. For strength and durability use a double fisherman's knot for the loop. :-)



If there were only one desigated drive then I would say super to the cord idea, very cost effective, but I'm sure the guys just wouldnt bother.

The ones I have seen on the net look a bit fragile, I want something thats durable, but light weight and possibly in a bright green colour so its easily noticed, should it be remove from the belt and be misplaced.
Lawlee45239  
#10 Posted : 28 February 2012 13:14:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

chris42 wrote:
Sorry I was under the impression that you wanted something that when an operative got out of, say a FLT, that they had to take the keys with them (security of FLT). Not something that stop the FTL if there was an accident.

The Google search I suggested gave me :- the advert below (name removed) for £17.95. I guessing from the removed reply that I was wrong (I wonder what it said)

Retractable Key Holder fits all belts up to 55mm. It comes with a commercial 1200mm tough nylon coated Kevlar cord and polycarbonate case with ball-socket weight support - ideal for heavy key bunches/small tools, etc. The keys lock in place, which stops them bouncing up and down on the sprung cord.


Thats it Chris, good man, no its for security reasons, so that no one else can operate the piece of plant.
Safety Smurf  
#11 Posted : 28 February 2012 16:20:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Graham Bullough wrote:
How about piece of string alias cord ?!!! I've long had a loop of nylon cord attached to my house & car keys so that I can secure them to my trouser belt or rucsack as and when necessary. Have done this for decades ever since losing a car key during an outdoor activity and then spending time trying to find it. For strength and durability use a double fisherman's knot for the loop. :-)



Sorry Graham but I must disagree with you on this issue. A rewoven figure '8' knot would be far better! ;-)
Graham Bullough  
#12 Posted : 28 February 2012 19:04:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

At the risk of stating the obvious, the weakness in any system of attachment between the vehicle/plant/machinery key and driver/operator is that some users may decide they can't be
bothered to use it. Therefore, if there is a reasonable security-related need for such a system to be used, it's advisable to give appropriate prior instruction about this and follow it up with ad-hoc monitoring.

Hopefully, other forum users might be able to offer information about systems and arrangements which have been found to work. For example, it's just possible that drivers of Royal Mail vans use a key attachment system for journeys which involve frequent/routine stops in busy public places. It's also possible that if physical key attachment systems are not practicable, the ignition systems of vehicles can be modified electronically to require the presence of some sort of coded proximity device worn by the driver. However, such a system would also be fallible if drivers could remove such devices and sellotape them inside their vehicles near to whatever detects them.

This topic also reminds me of reports in my local paper from some years ago about instances of vehicles being stolen while left unattended with keys left in their ignitions or even with their engines running while their drivers nipped into shops to buy newspapers or cigarettes, etc. The consequences for the drivers were considerable: They were astounded to learn that the vehicle insurers usually refused to pay anything for the losses involved on the very valid grounds that that drivers hadn't taken reasonable care for the security of their vehicles. The drivers probably also committed some sort of traffic offence by leaving engines running or keys in ignitions. Further problems would arise if the vehicles contained documents or unencrypted laptops, etc with confidential information about individuals (subject to the Data Protection Act) and/or commercially sensitive information. In the case of company vehicles, the drivers would be far from popular with their employers/fleet operators. In summary, a whole heap of problems brought by the drivers on themselves because they were too stupid or lazy to take their keys with them.


Lawlee45239  
#13 Posted : 29 February 2012 10:21:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Graham Bullough wrote:
At the risk of stating the obvious, the weakness in any system of attachment between the vehicle/plant/machinery key and driver/operator is that some users may decide they can't be
bothered to use it. Therefore, if there is a reasonable security-related need for such a system to be used, it's advisable to give appropriate prior instruction about this and follow it up with ad-hoc monitoring.

Hopefully, other forum users might be able to offer information about systems and arrangements which have been found to work. For example, it's just possible that drivers of Royal Mail vans use a key attachment system for journeys which involve frequent/routine stops in busy public places. It's also possible that if physical key attachment systems are not practicable, the ignition systems of vehicles can be modified electronically to require the presence of some sort of coded proximity device worn by the driver. However, such a system would also be fallible if drivers could remove such devices and sellotape them inside their vehicles near to whatever detects them.

This topic also reminds me of reports in my local paper from some years ago about instances of vehicles being stolen while left unattended with keys left in their ignitions or even with their engines running while their drivers nipped into shops to buy newspapers or cigarettes, etc. The consequences for the drivers were considerable: They were astounded to learn that the vehicle insurers usually refused to pay anything for the losses involved on the very valid grounds that that drivers hadn't taken reasonable care for the security of their vehicles. The drivers probably also committed some sort of traffic offence by leaving engines running or keys in ignitions. Further problems would arise if the vehicles contained documents or unencrypted laptops, etc with confidential information about individuals (subject to the Data Protection Act) and/or commercially sensitive information. In the case of company vehicles, the drivers would be far from popular with their employers/fleet operators. In summary, a whole heap of problems brought by the drivers on themselves because they were too stupid or lazy to take their keys with them.




Way too far....the keys as you are aware are to be removed from the item of plant when not in use (on a construction site), to prevent others for going onto it and operating it (not authorised or competent persons)....and after a number of times of telling the guys to remove the keys they still fail to do so, therefore I am taking the step to get such an attachment for the keys, this is not uncommon, but I just cannot think of the name of it.
Safety Smurf  
#14 Posted : 29 February 2012 10:40:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

What you are describing is a Lanyard
Graham Bullough  
#15 Posted : 29 February 2012 11:23:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Lawlee

Methinks I wasn't going too far - just developing/expanding the topic you initiated: The basic problem is the same whether it's about site plant/machinery or vehicles. I included my queries about vehicle key arrangements in the hope of finding out from others what sort of arrangements exist if any. Furthermore, if guys on your site/s can't be bothered to remove keys from plant when left unattended, perhaps there's not much hope of them using cord or stretchy type lanyards either! There's also the possibility that you might not be getting the message over to the guys effectively. Therefore, perhaps the message might be more effective coming alternatively or additionally from others.

Now for a DEViation alias DIGression, mainly for Safety Smurf: When I referred to a "double fisherman's knot", perhaps I should have written "double fisherman's bend"! Were you thinking of a "grapevine knot" in relation to a 'rewoven figure 8 knot'?!!!! :-)

p.s. For those who wonder about the capitalisations of the opening letters of the words deviation and digression above, I'm experimenting with a possible code system for the benefit of forum users. i.e. DEV or DIG serve to warn readers that I'm digressing/deviating from the main thrust of the topic. Other possibilities are REM for reminiscing about circumstances as long as two or three decades ago and even BORing! Any other suggestions?
Safety Smurf  
#16 Posted : 29 February 2012 11:42:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

DEV

TLA's anyone?
Lawlee45239  
#17 Posted : 29 February 2012 12:08:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Lawlee45239

Graham Bullough wrote:
Lawlee

Methinks I wasn't going too far - just developing/expanding the topic you initiated: The basic problem is the same whether it's about site plant/machinery or vehicles. I included my queries about vehicle key arrangements in the hope of finding out from others what sort of arrangements exist if any. Furthermore, if guys on your site/s can't be bothered to remove keys from plant when left unattended, perhaps there's not much hope of them using cord or stretchy type lanyards either! There's also the possibility that you might not be getting the message over to the guys effectively. Therefore, perhaps the message might be more effective coming alternatively or additionally from others.

I could take bate and bite back, but I wont, your opinion is not helpful.
Graham Bullough  
#18 Posted : 29 February 2012 13:09:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Lawlee - My suggestion about the message from you to the site guys about plant keys wasn't intended as personal criticism or baiting of you. There could be all sorts of reasons why the message might not be effective. These could include just how you - or rather your role - is perceived by the guys. That's why I suggested using others to help with the message. Also, the main problem might just be the attitude of the site guys regarding safety and other matters generally, not just keys.

Also, having posted your topic on a public discussion forum, you presumably accepted the likelihood that aspects of it would be discussed and expanded as well as providing the information you seek. However, we don't always read or hear what we would like to hear. That's an inevitable facet of discussion, debate, etc.

Back to your main topic - hopefully some forum users can respond with practical effective suggestions about how to get plant/machinery operators to remove keys when necessary. The same goes for drivers and vehicle keys. Though slogans are limited in their effect, has anyone come across or thought of possibly relevant slogans? For starters I offer "Leaving it be? Take the key". Though it rhymes, it's admittedly far from brilliant. Hopefully, others can suggest far better ones. Also, my assertion about the effectiveness of slogans may well provoke disagreement from others - disagreement welcome in the spirit of this forum!
Graham Bullough  
#19 Posted : 02 March 2012 17:09:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

As this topic has dropped from forum page 1 into near oblivion on page 2, it's time to repeat an earlier query as to whether anyone knows of proximity devices for authorised users of plant, machinery and vehicles. One reason for asking concerns the woodworking machines used by staff in the technology depts of secondary schools throughout the UK. The ones in my employer's schools, usually in storerooms or technician's rooms, all have key-controlled switches so that only trained authorised employees can use them.

Though the rooms are out of bounds to pupils unless supervised, the key switches are intended as another measure to prevent pupils using or playing with the machines (usually including a circular saw, a planing machine and sometimes a spindle moulding machine) and risking serious injury from the high speed cutters.

It's not feasible for authorised users to have the control keys on stretchy lanyards. Sometimes I've found machines left unattended and with the keys left in the control switches. On such occasions I've tended to have a discussion with the heads of dept and their colleagues. Even though the likelihood of a pupil venturing to start a machine is relatively low, the potential for harm to such a pupil is high. A handy approach to reinforce the matter is to ask what adverse outcomes might arise. With a few hints, the teachers and technicians (if any these days) usually identify a) HSE investigation & prosecution, b) adverse media coverage (including stuff on the internet for all to see anytime, not just local press articles) and c) disciplinary action by their employer.

Another category of persons to be excluded from using school woodworking machines comprises members of the public who join evening classes held in schools with the main purpose of being able to use departmental machines for little cost, even though they are not trained or supervised. In one case a few years ago one of my employer's schools suspected that an evening class had either tampered with the key control to a woodworking machine or somehow obtained an illicit copy of the key. This led to the control being fitted with a new key barrel and trained school staff being given matching new keys: It would have been interesting to have used a covert camera to record the reactions of the errant evening class people involved when they next tried to use the machine! Also, they couldn't complain about the change of key because this would have amounted to a confession of having used the machine in breach of the agreement between the school and the evening class organisers about which machines could and couldn't be used.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.