Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
johng  
#1 Posted : 03 March 2012 13:06:43(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
johng

Has anyone used any type of personality profiling in heath & safety training
We are looking at doing some training on how peoples personality could have an influence on how some people take more risks than others
Canopener  
#2 Posted : 03 March 2012 14:24:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

John, although we have done such profiling in the past we haven't applied or used this specifically for health and safety purposes. It will be interesting to hear if others have and if so, how they used the information. Good luck,

Phil - ENFP!
KieranD  
#3 Posted : 03 March 2012 18:45:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
KieranD

Johng

There are at least 4 well-researched personality measurement instruments available for the purpose you state. Which is most suitable depends on your objectives, your budget (not just for training but for licensing and unit cost of the instrument) and on the skills of the interpreters

Training in three of them is available in the UK, to standards specified by the Psychological Testing Centre of the British Psychological Society.

If you want detailed information, you can reach me at 020 8654 0808.
KieranD  
#4 Posted : 04 March 2012 07:02:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
KieranD

Johng

In addition to the level of measureable return on your investment, a vital reason for learning to use a personality measure reasonably well validated for the purpose you have in mind is that unless you do so, your employer may well find themselves on the receiving end of a claim for damages for indirect discrimination, for which there is in principle no upper limit and ignorance is not an admissible 'excuse'.

This is simply to advocate competent choice, as well as usage, of valuable tools which can have very powerful effects, either positively or negatively, on individuals measured.

It's also worth adding that the more you understand the underlying research, the more cost-effectively you can figure out how to get co-operation from management in your use of well-selected tools. In my experience, this means that the direct cost for administering, processing and providing standardised feedback can be reduced by 60+% if you go about the task of selection and use wisely.
walker  
#5 Posted : 05 March 2012 08:24:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker


My experiences of these (albiet some time ago) lead me to believe they are peddled by modern snake oil merchants.

To me a science can predict something in black & white, not something thats slightly better than the outcome of totally random answers.
bob youel  
#6 Posted : 05 March 2012 09:06:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
bob youel

Some of these tools can be good and useful but you need to proactively plan properly to deal with any outcomes; especially negative ones, and as its a specialist area I advise that you get the appropriate support as your info out is only as good as your info in

tabs  
#7 Posted : 05 March 2012 09:57:14(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
tabs

Walker, I have been through several of these and found that whilst they are not utterly accurate on all points, they are far better at getting close to the true personality than random assignment could ever be.

It is not snake oil when done correctly - the latest exercise went through 30+ people and was very insightful and simple to corroborate on the traits easier to spot with the naked brain.

Word of caution though, it can lead to people being treated as stereotypes based on their dominant trait rather than their current disposition - none of these techniques take into account recent history on an ongoing basis. It can be tiresome to always be referred to as one type when really you are a complex person.
walker  
#8 Posted : 05 March 2012 13:15:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

Tabs,
Your third sentence simply confirms my prejudices.
tabs  
#9 Posted : 05 March 2012 13:33:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
tabs

walker wrote:
Tabs,
Your third sentence simply confirms my prejudices.


:-) then I think your prejudice should be against those who lock onto single bits of the information provided - not the process of profiling.

It's akin to saying health and safety is just a burden, when really it's the wrongful application of the subject which is the problem :-)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.