Rank: Super forum user
|
Have you any good examples from courses or interaction with inspectors where you have been able to set a benchmark for when risk becomes significant in a general workforce setting? A related question is how do you determine when general tasks require an assessment of risk.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
To be slightly pedantic, ALL tasks require a risk assessment. Where I think you're coming from on this is when do the findings of the assessment become significant and therefore must be recorded as per Reg 3 MHSW Regs?
With my Inspectors hat on, my view was that any activity which had a risk of anything more than a trivial injury should have a documented assessment and the scope of that assessment should be proportionate to the potential level of harm and the likelihood.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I recently saw a risk assessment for turning on/off a light switch in an office with the possible outcome of electrocution.
The regs say Significant risk but I haven't heard of any recent reports where people have been injured turning on their light in the office.
Common sense should prevail. If it is an everyday task, should it need recording?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Big Nick wrote:The regs say Significant risk but I haven't heard of any recent reports where people have been injured turning on their light in the office.
No they don't. What they do say is that, if you have 5 or more employees, then the significant FINDINGS of the assessments should be recorded
Quote:Common sense should prevail. If it is an everyday task, should it need recording?
I tend to agree, but common sense isn't common practice. Some say that it's common sense not to put your hands into some unguarded machinery, but it still happens. And describing something as an "everyday task" can be somewhat vague too.
To my mind, it's all about being proportionate to the actual level of risk. Should you have a documented risk assessment for turning on a light switch? No. Should you have a risk assessment which includes management of the fixed electrical installation? Yes. Think about the worst case scenario and, should the worst happen, how would you be able to justify to the chap in the wig and the gown what you have or haven't done?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Apologies I stand corrected I was getting mixed up with 'suitable and sufficient' too many S's.
So when redken wants to determine the risk of a general task he should carry out a mental risk assessment and if HE thinks that the findings are significant he should document it.
Its all about the assessors perception of the risk then.
Oh I also saw an assessment for picking up dead birds.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.