Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
NLivesey  
#1 Posted : 15 March 2012 16:58:39(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NLivesey

Here's a tricky one that's been pitched to me and I'm after some feedback from you, my learned colleagues. Here's the scenario (take it on face value with no additional curve balls) - Someone has a known chronic medical condition (e.g. Asthma) and as a part of their work is exposed to stone dust. They wear the correct and approved PPE but after the shift has ended they develop a chest infection that requires medical attention and a number of days off work. Now, this is where I'm scratching my head. Would this be classed as a chronic condition (because of the illness) or an acute condition (because of the aggravation) when taking into account the RIDDOR regs? My gut says that a chronic condition would be the key element thus the classification would not fall into the classification of a Major RIDDOR... But I'm open to constructive feedback if this is a misinterpretation. Thanks in advance.
David Bannister  
#2 Posted : 15 March 2012 17:04:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

How do you know the infection is work related?
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#3 Posted : 15 March 2012 17:34:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

It is possible to have an acute exacerbation of a chronic condition. A chronic bronchitic will have episodes of acute chest infection, because their underlying condition predisposes to an acute infection, while suffering the underlying chronic condition. So, don't try to separate acute and chronic. They can co-exist. The infection may be an acute exacerbation of the underlying chronic lung disease. How that acute infection was acquired is a separate issue, but the likelihood is that the pre-existing damage increased both the susceptibility and severity of this acute episode.
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 15 March 2012 23:13:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

One cannot be "infected" by dust. I trust that PPE is the last resort here and that other dust suppression systems are in operation.
Thomo  
#5 Posted : 16 March 2012 10:25:32(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Thomo

The diagnosis was Chest infection (acute) If the diagnosis was asthmatic episode then I would class this as chronic. I assume the asthma was a per-existing and follow RIDDOR guidelines item 74 page 78.
Ron Hunter  
#6 Posted : 16 March 2012 11:18:11(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Infection is the operative word here. Nothing here to suggest the infection arose out of or in connection with work. No mention of unfavourable climate issues, and presumably not working in a Lab!
johnmurray  
#7 Posted : 16 March 2012 12:39:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

Interesting. Many, and I mean a large proportion of, people with chronic pulmonary conditions have also a chronic infection. This may well be dormant for the large part, but may be exacerbated by inhalation of any material which leads to an increase of the existing inflammation. There is also another problem with chronic pulmonary disease, known as colonisation, where the pathogen/s are present more or less permanently.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.