Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Doobrifurkin  
#1 Posted : 29 March 2012 08:45:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Doobrifurkin

We have been advised by an employees Lymphoma Association Clinical Nurse Specialist of the side effects of his treatment and his suggested phased return to work which I fully agree with. My question for advice to my peers is that understanding that their immune system has been severely affected by his treatment and although their ability to fight infection has significantly improved, they can still be prone to infections for a few months compared to a normal healthy person of the same age, what further arrangements could / should I be looking to implement to protect them from possible further infection while at work? With that, I understand they could catch and infection from anyone outside work; however, his place of work is a machine shop as an inspector of quality, with a machine shop having coolant systems which are fully controlled, potentially sharp edged components just machined that he is likely to handle and physical conditions that could affect his energy levels. Any advice from anyone having come across this type of issue are greatly appreciated.
Steve Granger  
#2 Posted : 29 March 2012 11:21:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve Granger

Doob - this is exactly what the discussion should be taking place on the fit note between the employer and the GP. IOSH are working hard on this issue but I suggest you contact the LA, and similar charitable organisations to get 'general advice'.There is so much information available on their websites that it may be a case of overload and we forget that each case is different so the key here is the individual being able to manage their own RTW without undue pressure, either expressed or, more likely - perceived. There will be other significant issues such as endurance, fatigue, stress tolerance, medication side effects etc. I think this is a good example where a rounded knowledge is all we need to ensure the proper discussions take place between HR, GP and of course most importantly the employee. Steve
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#3 Posted : 29 March 2012 13:25:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

You risk treading on dangerous ground if you start making enquiries around your employee, even though this is well-intentioned. It's a bit like those who seek advice on what to do with pregnant or disabled workers - surely the best thing is to talk with them! It is the individual who has the experience of your workplace and their work tasks/environment etc. They have contact with and can get advice from GP, hospital consultants, LA and other specialist nurses etc. They also know how they feel and will have been briefed on what to expect, what to worry about, signs and symptoms etc. Make use of their contacts and put the individual at the centre; make them the communication hub etc. Of course, there is the {hopefully small} possibility that this will be abused but let's assume not, and you can keep a wary eye for that.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.