Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
KAJ Safe  
#1 Posted : 20 April 2012 15:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
KAJ Safe

We have a number of lathes (long bed type) and we put long lengths of steel onto them which are turned into shafts of varying diameters (could be 3-4m in length).
These lathes are from the year "dot", very old, reliable but there is no guarding whatsoever.

Many, many years ago (before my time), an employee was dragged through one of the lathes due to the bar that was being turned being rough and it caught on his clothes and pulled him under and through it (luckily there was only bruising) - he was stood at te centre of the bar and nowhere near the chuck end.

Puwer reg 11 highlights preventing access to dangerous parts - I considered this to be the chuck and grinding part until I was told of the tale above so I now have to consider the bar which is being turned as well.

Due to the age and location of controls on these machines, I am struggling to come up with effective solutions for guarding, which would still make them safe to be used in a practical way.

Has anyone worked with these or come up with suitable solutions for something similar.

JJ Prendergast  
#2 Posted : 20 April 2012 16:35:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

Try companies such as RDM Engineering or Nelsa Machine Tools (Google etc)

They supply machine tools guards.

ALso British Standard docuemnt PD5304 or HSE book HSG129 Safety in Engineering Workshops (or something similiar!!)
KAJ Safe  
#3 Posted : 22 April 2012 19:43:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
KAJ Safe

Thanks JJ but the HSG doesn't really cover the lathe equipment from yester year.
Bob Shillabeer  
#4 Posted : 22 April 2012 20:39:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Bob Shillabeer

The lathe may be very old but you still need to provide adequate guards to be able to use them. As has been suggested by others you need to provide guards that adequately prevent anyone being trapped etc. Modifications need to be designed and installed that allow the required standard of compliance with the law at least. I suggest you call an equipment designer and get them priced and installed before the lathe is used again. Otherwise you are left wide open to both criminal action and very high compensation should anything go wrong.
JJ Prendergast  
#5 Posted : 23 April 2012 08:11:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

Cuttell80003 wrote:
Thanks JJ but the HSG doesn't really cover the lathe equipment from yester year.


This is largely irrelevant. You already seem to be well aware of PUWER Reg 11, follow the guarding hierarchy.

The companies I quoted supply machine guards for all types of standard machine tools. Guarding a lathe has well established methods (whatever its age).
KAJ Safe  
#6 Posted : 23 April 2012 08:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
KAJ Safe

Thanks JJ, I have looked at the sites you mentioned and it will cover some of my concerns (chuck area etc) as these are normally thought to be the dangerous parts.
What I am trying to decide is now I know that it was the actual bar that was being worked on which caused the damage as it was this that caught the clothing and dragged him through (not the chuck part etc).
The operator has to constantly check this bar which could be 4 metres long and trying come up with suitable guarding is proving a headache.
thanks
again
JJ Prendergast  
#7 Posted : 23 April 2012 08:45:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JJ Prendergast

With long pieces of work/large lathes its usual practice to mount some form of guard on the saddle of the lather. So that it protects the operator as the tool/saddle cuts along the job.

Mutliposition magnetic guards can be used, not ideal but better than nothing.
walker  
#8 Posted : 23 April 2012 08:53:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
walker

The issues you have are quite common, the company you work for seem to be at least 10 years behind the times.
I retrofitted pre war machines about 15 years ago for my then employer, it can be done. I used RDM as a matter of fact.


Here is a recent incident that sounds pretty much the situtaion you have:

http://www.crownoffice.g...nguarded-Machinery-Death
Invictus  
#9 Posted : 23 April 2012 11:19:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Invictus

JJ, thanks for the companies named I have been looking for a particular guard and through your info. found it. I had actually forgot about it until reading this post this morning. It wouldn't have been dangerous without just safer for the type of people using the equipment.

I suppose this is when the discussion pages come into it's own.
Richard Rose  
#10 Posted : 24 April 2012 15:43:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Richard Rose

In my previous workplace, we had a very similar setup, a lathe from year dot, no guard, and a reluctance to actually sort it.

I ended up getting a standard guard from a local engineering firm, which turned out to be too small, and they just delivered it, wih wires sticking out for the interlock guard, which wasn't compatible with the electrics of our lathe, it was laughable.

The best bet is to get a good engineering form round to your place and explain what you want, i would suggest a good interlocking chuck guard, possibly adjustable if you have large diameter flanges on the lathe etc, and an on tool guard for the saddle\moving tool section, this way you are protecting from flying debris and from anyone leaving a chuck key in the tool!!, however preventing people from being dragged in on such a large unit poses its own problems, you may need an enclosed unit that cannot be entered when operating, however the older lathes will have manual adjustment.

Another idea is upgrade the lathe, we did that, but instead of a 1940 lathe, we got a 1970 lathe, tbh it wasnt much diff!

the main issue is you are trying to prevent debris hitting the operator, entanglement may need an adjustable full length guard that has a slot for the tool piece to move along, and then control the risk with SSoW. Its not easy.

I have been told that the old lathe we had threw off a 24" steel flange because the chuck was getting worn, there was a dent in the railing where the operator would have stood, thank god he had moved. this was another in the list of reasosn why i left that site!
Doug Florence  
#11 Posted : 25 April 2012 14:00:31(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Doug Florence

Machinery Directive Harmonised Standard BS EN23125:2010 covers safety of turning machines and makes some recommendations. If you can show that you comply with that, then it would be hard to make a legal case against you.

I guess these are not CNC machines.

Basically a large guard fence preventing access to the workpiece with an interlocked door which can only be unlocked with the lathe stationary is your only solution if you want to keep all people away from the whole length of the workpiece. Probably not practical though.

Try Proctor http://www.machinesafety.co.uk/ or we might be able to offer some specific advice if you provide some photos of your machines.
JohnW  
#12 Posted : 25 April 2012 15:57:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
JohnW

Doug,

I regard BS EN23125:2010 as applicable to NEW machines, so it is aimed at manufacturers and companies who have bought machines made to that specification

This thread is talking about old lathes so the PUWER regulations are what we should aim to comply with when designing guards and interlocks for them.

JohnW
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.