Rank: Forum user
|
Hello all does anyone have a risk assessment for security guards standing at a entrance to a clients site checking passes, vehicle searching, traffic management, commercial vehicle search, my manager says mine is not good enough even though, it relates to manual handling, working at heights (climbing into cabs) weather conditions, not approaching moving traffic, barriers are operated by pushing a button, covered hand signals, wearing of high viz jackets, standing outside in all weather conditions.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
While you write 'My manager says mine is not good enough', you then list a host of environmental and task variables whose hazards can be identified and controlled.
Two possible ways ahead include
a. the manager has identified task or environmental hazards, which he hasn't told you about (maybe you didn't ask him or her?)
b. the manager has a hunch that personal variables are sources of hazards, e.g. fatigue, stress, a physical or mental disability and expects you to conduct the reseearch necessary to identify and measure them so that they can be appropriately controlled.
Either way, a conversation with the manager is necessary. In the case of (a), the hazard control stage may then be straightforward; in the case of (b), you may well need assistance from an ergonomist and/or psychologist unless the manager is content for the alleged 'risk' to remain an uncontrolled residual
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Have you considered the actual security function within his role. I think you should consider doing a separate RA based on the physical risk the role could present.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
sitesafe wrote:....... working at heights (climbing into cabs)
Is this really working at heights??? This is a genuine question as I do not work in H&S (fire safety). I am a bit shocked that such an everyday low risk task could attract a WAH label
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
This reminds me of the Pointy-Haired Boss saying to Dilbert "Write a better report". Telling you it's not good enough doesn't help in knowing what to improve. Is it that you have misidentified the hazards, misestimated the risks, presented it poorly? It could be anything!
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.