Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Adams29600  
#1 Posted : 19 June 2012 16:19:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Adams29600

An old ISO container sits in a yard. It is in reasonable condition, but not subject to any sort of testing / inspection that a road/rail/sea going ISO container is subject to. It has sat in the yard for "some" time. It is used to store "stuff" of unknown quantity / weight, but unlikely to be beyond the container's original design parameters. If the container were to be lifted by a crane to relocate it in the yard and it still contained "stuff" would it be a lifting accessory and subject to statutory inspection under LOLER? I think it would and my course of action would be to empty it to move it, but views welcome.
PH2  
#2 Posted : 19 June 2012 16:48:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PH2

Hi, In my opinion it would be subject to LOLER. The "Stuff" inside it constitutes the load being lifted, so the ISO container would be a lifting accessory. It needs to be inspected (especially the lifting points), but you would probably need to do a bit of homework and not simply assume that it is capable of lifting the load. It may have deteriorated with age: rust may be present on the underside (especially if it has been in contact with wet ground), it may have been damaged the last time that it was put in its present condition. If you empty it prior to its lift, the lifting points will still need to be subjected to a thorough examination. The usual lifting plan and supervised lift comments would then apply. It might be worthwhile getting your insurer's opinion. PH2
Ron Hunter  
#3 Posted : 20 June 2012 11:05:30(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

NO - LOLER is NOT applicable to the container. It and contents are the load (same as it would be for a skip). See http://www.hse.gov.uk/lau/lacs/90-4.htm
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 20 June 2012 11:26:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

I should really learn to read posts more closely. When and if the container is to be lifted, Reg 4 of LOLER would be relevant to the strength & adequacy of the lifting lugs.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.