Rank: New forum user
|
Hello, Does anybody know of any good resources for finding out the vibration values for hand held pneumatic tools. Mainly Sullair Pneumatic Chipping tool, Old needle guns and hand held shot blast equipment. I need to conduct some assessments but can not find the required information. HELP!!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
google... phone manufacture... + the HSE post some guidance values, I used these to get started when I was really stuck. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg175.pdfI know there are some other resources too but can't remember them off hand.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
You can try the Off Highway Plant & Equipment Research Center (OPERC) website, i know they have carried out some independent testing on pneumatic tools and utensils. I can also send you some literature that we as a business have produced and provide to the end user of this type equipment which includes EAVs & ELVs if it would help (would require a postal address though). Old needle guns is a difficult one, would probably require manufacturing information.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Just be mindful that the manufacturers data for 'old' equipment will be the vibration magnitude from new and not what the current vibration magnitudes are. These can change depending on use and care and whether the tool has been maintained.
The Regs book L140 gives some guidance on the vibration magnitude of certain pieces of equipment it suggest that modern needle guns are between 5 and 7 m/s squared and older designs between 10 and 25 m/s squared. For older design chipping tools 18 m/s and modern designs 10 m/s.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
get somebody in; as by the time you get old info, if old info is available, you will have spent lots of £ to realise that old info is no good without real time evaluation to go with it
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I agree with Bob, get someone in and get measurements done. Manufacturers info is for new tools in laboratory conditions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Don't waste money having things measured unless it is essential, the Vibration regs do not require this approach and I am sure that the HSE do not encourage it. If you cannot find the manufactures data do some proper research on the Internet, there are many vibration databases available with 1000s of actual field trial measurements that you can use. If you cannot find the actual model then estimate the typical vibration magnitude from research done on similar tools Try this database for starters http://www.vibration.db.umu.se/HavSok.aspx?lang=enregards Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
After working directly with the HSE [G.Chisum] in this area in the early & mid nineties and with employers who ended up paying out millions [yep millions] I found that without human measurement you have lost your case - and many forget that its human dose and not equipment vibration level that we are talking about and you cannot get human dose without human measurement e.g. measuring the does rate of the person whilst a person is actually using the equipment as equipment measure alone did not satisfy any court that I know of
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Are we back to the difference of expectation between statutory and civil courts?
The Vibration regs allow the employer to take a sfairp approach, not necessarily all-round measurement of everything.
The civil cases Bob speaks of would been successful because there were NO control measures, no idea, no specific regulations.
If an employer nowadays implements a reasoned vibration management system, the potential for injury has already massively reduced, although the use of badly-flawed data does leave a small 'hole'. Other defence layers in the system should pick this up, or compensate.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Evo I am sure that you are already aware that you may have a serious vibration problem with the tools you mentioned ie old Needle Guns typical value at 16 m/s2 limits you to 12 mins on the trigger to reach the action value. A typical value for Chipping Hammer at 11.5 m/s2 gives you 23 mins to reach the EAV. This is the database suggested by the HSE to assist with estimating exposures www.las-bb.de/karla/index.htm.For those following this thread who need further support for this approach please follow the link http://www.hse.gov.uk/vi...mployers/assessrisks.htmI have had couple of meetings with the HSE in recent months regarding this subject. Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Having undertaken a number of vibration assessments myself, and also having use the OPERC website i would advise the follwoing;
Use the OPERC website first and foremost using the information contained therin in your vibration risk assessments; If you cannot get the information from OPERC either undertake the vibration assessments yourself (if competent to do so) or get someone in to do the assessments for you.
there is plenty of information on the OPERC site.
allan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I had the same problem when I worked in a large fab and welding shop.
I found a supplier that provided low vibration needle guns off the top of my head I think the vibration measurement was about 3.5 metres per second.
No prizes for guessing the amount of trigger time with this type of equipment is massive compared to the old type,
We simply removed the old type from the shop floor and replaced them with the new ones.
By the time you pay for measurements it will be cheaper to buy the new kit.
If you want to PM me I will give you the manufacturers name.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
evo wrote:Hello, Does anybody know of any good resources for finding out the vibration values for hand held pneumatic tools. Mainly Sullair Pneumatic Chipping tool, Old needle guns and hand held shot blast equipment. I need to conduct some assessments but can not find the required information. HELP!!!! All power tools should come with the exposure value limits, (new) old hand held tools are different. Important sources for vibration information include scientific and technical journals, trade associations and online data bases , HSE experience has shown that vibration level is higher than that quoted by manufacturers. The reasons for this discrepancy may be that :equipment is not well maintained :equipment not suitable for the material being worked :the tool has been purchased from a reputable dealer, or from outside Europe :the accessories are not appropriate or badly fitted :the operative is not using the tool correctly In view of these problems The HSE recommend the exposure limit be doubled when comparisons are made with exposure limits. Hire or buy new, hands should be protected by gloves to keep hands warm, and be used by trained personnel only and good rotation of tasks. It is important for all bits and points to be kept sharp and good communication between yourself and the operative.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.