Rank: Super forum user
|
a HOSPITAL HAS ONLY ONE FIRE ESCAPE IN A WARD OF 14 BEDS APPROX 20 METRES IN LENTGH TO THE FIRE ESCAPE. If structural work is carried out would an additional fire escape at 45 degrees need to be made to comply with modern regs
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
SBH,
The advice given in "Fire safety in healthcare premises" recommends a maximum travel distance of 15m if patients are dependant or highly dependant, and 18m if they are independent.
So my answer is yes, I would assume that an additional fire escape should be provided (SFAIRP).
PH2
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
First of all i would like to point out that fire safety in healthcare premises is not the book you go off in the NHS.
the books we use are a part b building regs and also the firecode in this instance HTM 05-02 chapter 5.33
the building regs would point out table d1 page 131 that the hospital is class 2a institutional then go to page 37 table 3
limitations of travel distance this will point out that the traval distance for a class 2 a institutional is 9metres in a single direction however this is prefixed to note 2, note 2 informes a person that If provision for means of escape is being made in a hospital or other health care building by following the detailed guidance in the relevant part of the Department of Health
“Firecode”, the recommendations about travel distances in
the appropriate “Firecode” document should be followed.
the relevent firecode guidance is HTM 05-02 chapter 5.33
which states that (not as pointed out abouve) that the traval distance is as follows
5.33 The maximum travel distance before there is a
choice of escape routes should be no more than
15 m for in-patient accommodation or 18 m for all
other parts of healthcare buildings.
as this is a 14 bedded ward i would seriously contacting your competant fire safety adviser who should put in extra procedures especially if this is an orthopedic ward or elderly were the patients will be bed ridden on waking up should there be an incident. a yard is a yard but to extand a travel distance by a quarter is asking for trouble. when its a single escape route
also when it comes to SFAIRP it does not hold always in a hospital environment due to the vulnerability of the patients what about false bulkheads tarpaulins, tunnals loss of flooring during an emergency as persons get out, removal of fire load etc like i say there is alot to look at, in the past we have even had to close or get extra staff or even add extra sub compartmentation
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
It is not only a matter of distance as what would happen if a fire is declared close to the only exit? So you need to seek asairp of the possibility to have one additional in opposite direction to the existing ext.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.