IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Creamfields cancelled for health and safety reasons
Rank: Forum user
|
Creamfields dance music festival was cancelled a day early due to heavy rain and flooding of some of the car parks and camp sites.
The organizers said the festival had been closed in the interest of health and safety, do you think that this time the health and safety concerns were genuine?
http://www.warringtongua...cancelled_due_to_floods/
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Yes in more general terms.
We should be careful when we get all defensive about H&S. Sometimes it’s obvious that someone is using H&S as an excuse other times we H&S professionals start saying “Well it’s not in any regulation, so it’s not H&S!” forgetting any sort of general duty and common sense.
A muddy field with hundreds (thousands?) of people camping on it can quickly become an impassable morass. People can’t get on or off , including the emergency services. You can’t get things like toilet cleaning crews on. It soon becomes unviable. Further more you will always find a small number of idiots who will try to make it worse with the risk of vehicles colliding or driving over tents etc. No there comes a point when you have to give up and say let’s go home.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Definitely
My husband and son went to Download at Donnington Park in June and it was a quagmire. As the stage was at the bottom of the hill the number of people that just simply slipped down the hill were numerous. They delayed the start by two hours because of the rain and danger of some of the equipment collapsing in the winds (health and safety) and then it was almost impossible to get off the site because the fields were muddy and they had to build a type of bailey bridge to get the cars out of the car park and these were wheel spinning with the back ends sliding away while people were trying to access their own cars - thankfully no one was killed.
My husband and son stuck it out for two half days then gave up and came home. So, yes, I do think that sometimes H&S has to step in for the common good and say "enough" before someone gets hurt. While the public are not at work, the organisers are and the performers are and they have a duty of care to all visitors and non employees under Section 3 of the HSW Act.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
They also cancelled the second (last) day of the Mathew Street Festival in Liverpool. Bands due to play in bars/pubs were fine but all the stages were cancelled mid morning yesterday due to expected weather conditions leading to Health & Safety issues.
Can understand them cancelling both if situation wasn't due to get better. Sods law that in Liverpool yesterday the wind barely got up and it didn't rain too much so probably Mathew St Fest could have gone ahead. Mind it was nice and quiet where i live for a change...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I think I would rather they said it was due to 'safety' concerns (not health and safety).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I too was at Download and saw people in wheelchairs sliding down the slope, hitting people from behind, while they were trying to get to the viewing platform. One guy got knocked over completely by one of the motorised chairs- there was just no grip at all. My heart went out to the woman in the chair, she was mortified. I don't think the platform was closed at any point. I saw about half a dozen people being carried to the first aid stations after slipping in the mud- all lower leg injuries.
The whole site was a bit on the "muddy" side.
Credit to the organisers- I think they did a good job.
Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Yep, I agree with all of the above. I think the organizers made the right call and it's certainly a safety issue.
I've stopped bothering with outdoor events in the UK now. Standing in the rain and getting covered in mud doesn't appeal anymore, and there's a lot to be said for 4 walls, a roof and some plumbing
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Clairel makes an excellent point. When a phrase becomes associated in peoples' minds with a certain reaction, people stop paying attention to the words which make up the phrase.
"Safety reasons" makes people think the festival was closed for... safety reasons.
"Health & Safety reasons" makes people think it was closed by someone with a clipboard and elbow patches, unfortunately.
Reclaiming this is hard. Another example is the move (twenty years ago or so) to describe people who needed additional support with life as having "special needs". I liked this, since it emphasises that we're all unique, including those with disabilities, and all most of us should be doing is focussing on what those "needs" are.
I realised I was naively hopeful when I heard a class teacher describing her group to another teacher as "a bit special needsy". People just use the term as a replacement for the old "handicapped" now.
So yeah, Safety reasons, if that's what they were - it's clearer and deals with the issues, not the policy behind them, which no-one cares about when they're wading through mud.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
i was at Creamfields, and although certain areas were bad, the festival could have gone on if the Organisers had planned for floods, which they clearly had not, as when we left on the monday morning, certain exits were closed that posed no threat. The stewards on hand were useless, so there seemed to be no Health and Safety planning in place and proper training given to Stewards, probaly worse than this, was there seemed to be no team leaders on the ground. Really upset with the organisers, as last year had bad rain too, but they haven't learned from this. Other festivals like t in the park had worse rain, yet were prepared for this and went ahead, but no Creamfields. What was worse, was that we were suppose to go to the matthew Street festival, so not much luck there
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There's an unfortunate capitalisation ("Health and Safety") within the text of the referenced article, which will prompt visions of clipboards and elbow patches for some.
As Clairel rightly says, the "health" element seems entirely spurious. Presumably there's no overflowing sewage issue.
The event is cancelled because of the weather, flooding and mud. The safety issues arising are surely obvious to a 3 year old. Is there any justification in weaving the old 'health and safety' excuse into this?
I think not.
On the subject of health issues and large outdoor festivals:
Portable toilets.
Need I say more?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Clairel wrote:I think I would rather they said it was due to 'safety' concerns (not health and safety).
Clairel
As always, the voice of reason.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Clairel wrote:I think I would rather they said it was due to 'safety' concerns (not health and safety).
yep - i agree.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Motorhead wrote:I too was at Download and saw people in wheelchairs sliding down the slope, hitting people from behind, while they were trying to get to the viewing platform. One guy got knocked over completely by one of the motorised chairs- there was just no grip at all. My heart went out to the woman in the chair, she was mortified. I don't think the platform was closed at any point. I saw about half a dozen people being carried to the first aid stations after slipping in the mud- all lower leg injuries.
The whole site was a bit on the "muddy" side.
Credit to the organisers- I think they did a good job.
Andy
My son was at Download and loved every minute of it, couldn't sleep in the tent the last night as it was under mud, so came back with no tent, sleeping bag or any of the few clothes he took with him, covered in mud and a big smile. Then again he's only 17, maybe that's why we have to protect the young. When we were kids covered in mud my dad always said 'it could be worse they could be sick in bed'.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
quote=Invictus] Motorhead wrote:I too was at Download and saw people in wheelchairs sliding down the slope, hitting people from behind, while they were trying to get to the viewing platform. One guy got knocked over completely by one of the motorised chairs- there was just no grip at all. My heart went out to the woman in the chair, she was mortified. I don't think the platform was closed at any point. I saw about half a dozen people being carried to the first aid stations after slipping in the mud- all lower leg injuries.
The whole site was a bit on the "muddy" side.
Credit to the organisers- I think they did a good job.
Andy
My son was at Download and loved every minute of it, couldn't sleep in the tent the last night as it was under mud, so came back with no tent, sleeping bag or any of the few clothes he took with him, covered in mud and a big smile. Then again he's only 17, maybe that's why we have to protect the young. When we were kids covered in mud my dad always said 'it could be worse they could be sick in bed'.
I'm 48 and loved every minute of it! Luckily the tent was on a "less muddy" part of the site. However, we were too close to the runway at East Midlands. On a serious note. The amount of people who had to leave some of their stuff before they got to pitch the tent was horrendous- the mud was that bad they couldn't drag their stuff through it. And it was a longs way from the entrance to some of the camp sites. As a seasoned festival goer I was well prepared. Good sturdy boots, waterproofs, minimal stuff to carry. The only disappointment was Sabbath... but that's another story.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I don't think the organisers were worried that people miught get a bit muddy to be fair. The logistics of keeping a site running when it is that muddy must be horrendous.
The Yorkshire Show was cancelled on the second day this year (for the first time ever) because vehicles could not get on and off the ground.They didn't do that lightly, that cost thousands of pounds to the agricultural industry. They are now trying to prevent that ever happening again.
Whatever people say about it's only a bit of rain and mud and why couldn't organisers cope with it, this has been unprecedented rain this year with some of the wettest months on record. The ground is sodden and can't cope. I defy anyone to try and keep going wiht large scale events in those sorts of conditions.
As many on this forum will know I am one of the least risk averse people, undertaking many outdoor sports myself, and I am always moaning about decisons taken in the name of health and safety. But with the weather this year I can understand why orgainsers can't cope.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I also braved Download again this year and it was the worst I have ever seen it. Luckily we got there just before the rain started (and carried on for 4 days, followed by some high winds). Also left tent and most things there this year.
But its all part of the fun of camping, although we did leave on the Sunday this year. The car park's were pretty bad with 2-3 hour queues getting in and out at peak times due to the mud.
The organisers did try by putting down bales of hay, digging small trenches so allow for rain run off and sludge gulpers to get rid of the rivers of mud, alas it didn't help and a lot of the stewards were next to useless, but then that's nothing new.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
A third-party promoter was planning an event on land belonging to us but leased out to another third party (it's a great one for the lawyers) which we really didn't want to happen, for exactly the reasons Claire puts forward, but which we couldn't actually stop (not our event, land not in our control). Fortunately local licensing came to visit and they pulled the plug, much to our relief. The ground was so wet, we could see stuck vehicles, swamped tents and so on, and civil cases banging back and forth between all the parties involved. Sometimes we have to stop things,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
This link provides a pretty good explaination of the events for creamfields. http://www.creamfields.com/ .
While the phrase 'health and safety reasons' rings alarm bells, in this case it is probably true when you have to consider the welfare and health of 50,000 people as well as their safety.
It seems to me that a sensible decision was taken and executed under difficult circumstances and that they had a number of plans in place that need organisation of resources to implement.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
From a quick look at the link provided by mikeh at #18 it seems a shame that it didn't include or mention at the beginning the various photos which appear at the end as they instantly convey the nature and degree of the adverse conditions at the site. Remember the old adage about one photo being better than or equivalent to a thousand words!
Also, on a wry note, it seems to be the norm for some/many festival-goers to abandon their tents and related equipment when they leave the festivals: Is there a lucrative trade by which organisers or others can clean, dry and re-sell such items - or are the tents and sleeping bags, etc so cheap and poorly made that they don't last for more than several days in use?!!! Also, are there any schemes by which abandoned items are or could be collected and used for overseas aid projects? Tents for example might be regarded as worthless by some people in the UK with their "discard after use" attitude, but could provide much needed shade from the sun plus some privacy for poverty stricken people in refugee camps!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Graham Bullough wrote:
Also, on a wry note, it seems to be the norm for some/many festival-goers to abandon their tents and related equipment when they leave the festivals: Is there a lucrative trade by which organisers or others can clean, dry and re-sell such items - or are the tents and sleeping bags, etc so cheap and poorly made that they don't last for more than several days in use?!!! Also, are there any schemes by which abandoned items are or could be collected and used for overseas aid projects? Tents for example might be regarded as worthless by some people in the UK with their "discard after use" attitude, but could provide much needed shade from the sun plus some privacy for poverty stricken people in refugee camps!
I did hear that the tents make their way to charitable organisations. A friend of mine left her tent; "I'm never going to use the thing- I'm never going camping again!!!!" It was a new tent- one careful owner- used once. If the organisers do donate them its a feather in their cap.
Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Isn't this were what the goverment are saying and what the lawyers are thinking are to different matters, the government was saying if people want to chase cheese down a hill, attend concerts that are full of mud (they never said that I did) but if you look at what they were saying was that it is up to the person to make that choice.
On the other hand you have the lawyers saying yes attend by all means but if someone gets hurt they can sue.
No wonder your damned if you do and your damned if you don't.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The options for recycling tents that have been abandoned are extremely limited. At Glastonbury the local scout group used to come in and try to salvage what they could for charities (Oxfam, Christian Aid, Save the Children etc) but most of it was too damaged or too poor quality. The disposable style tents punted out by the high street leisure stores are just not good enough for use once they have suffered a wet british festival. (also you wouldn't believe what people do in them before they abandon them-a health hazard for the staff who have to clear up). Some of them are put in storage to use next year when people head to the welfare shed looking for somewhere dry to shelter but hundreds of tonnes of discarded tents, sleeping bags, gazebos and chairs all have to go to landfill and that has to be paid for. If you go to festivals please take your stuff away with you and leave no trace.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In such amounts, and even fewer if they are being particularly unhelpful, the Environment Agency can and on occasions do insist that this waste (tents) is managed to the letter of waste regulations. This requires that the sale and distribution of waste must operate only under appropriate licensing. What makes them take this view is a completely unknown quantity - sometimes they do, other times not, as if on a whim.
There is provision of this in the legislation though it is clearly not what was intended when the relevant waste regulation was drafted. However, a belligerent attitude and rigid interpretation by the Environment Agency is not unknown; they are presently doing this with items of used medical equipment that might be shipped overseas to resource-poor countries.
A regrettable and not uncommon example of the Environment Agency offering only barriers and obstruction, not answers, opportunities or solutions.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Definitely safety AND health reasons from looking at the photos, look at all that running water- OMG, can you imagine that running past the toilet facilities and then past the burger stands and beer tents - bleugh! no thank you!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanks to those of you who responded to my queries about re-using/recycling tents, etc. abandoned at festival sites. Also, Ian B's comments about waste legislation and the Environment Agency tend to reflect what I've heard and understood about them. Perhaps they and their effects on business and the UK economy merit hard scrutiny from politicians and media and far more than so than 'health and safety'.
And on a whimsical note, I guess it wouldn't be a good idea for anyone at a muddy festival site to sing The Hippopotamus Song by Michael Flanders and Donald Swann, especially the chorus which starts with the line "Mud, mud, glorious mud"! Humming the tune might be a safer bet as probably few people under the age of about 45 know the song. :-)
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Creamfields cancelled for health and safety reasons
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.