Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
RayRapp  
#1 Posted : 13 September 2012 11:24:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Not wishing to hi-jack another thread I have decided to start one regarding the Hillsborough disaster which led to nearly 100 football fans losing their lives due to overcrowding. It now transpires that evidence had been tampered with by the police in order to deflect the blame onto Liverpool fans - a shameful episode in the history of disasters. My sympathies to the families and friends of those who needlessly lost their lives.

Following the Hillsborough disaster an enquiry was led by Lord Justice Taylor, which directly led to all seater stadiums and ticket allocations. Learning lessons from previous disasters is an overly used phrase, but thankfully we have learnt lessons from Hillsborough and there has not been a similar incident since.
Ron Hunter  
#2 Posted : 13 September 2012 13:32:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

There were warnings from the Bradford City Fire only a few years before which should have shifted perceptions away from "crowd control" to "crowd safety."

I do hope that the individuals who tampered with so many witness statements are held to account. I think it of great concern that the integrity and public confidence in the Police has been so damaged by some small group of senior officers desperately trying to save their own necks.
Why did it take so long for this to come to light?
DP  
#3 Posted : 13 September 2012 13:58:47(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

96 people lost there liver through crowd miss-management, not over crowing, there is a massive difference - what followed was a utter disgrace to cover up the miss-management.

Ron - 'small group of senior officers' what about the other senior officers from West Midlands that reviewed this case? It took so long to come out because its rotten to the very top and I mean 'cabinet table' top - you cannot hide a cover up of that magnitude without ministers knowing the truth - everybody in Liverpool knew the truth from day one - Thatcher knew the next day - oh by the way the only record released of her visit to Hillsborough in the report is security arrangements to get her there and away from the ground. Must have had nothing to discuss eh?

For those thinking I'm just anti Tory - what about Jack Straw - can he look at himself in the mirror this morning?

You don’t need to go back to the Bradford Fire to understand what happen here -you need to go to the Miners Strike in 84 lies, lies and more dammed lies from that Tory Government.

Yes a rant but I have many friends there on that day and thank god they all came home.
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 13 September 2012 14:16:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

I don't disagree, I'm only concerned that every serving Police Officer may be mistakenly tarnished with the same brush.
Doobrifurkin  
#5 Posted : 13 September 2012 14:26:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Doobrifurkin

For me the Bradford Fire was a very different matter altogether, as crowd control wasn't an issue.

What should have been notied is that a similar incident resulting in many injuries, no fatalities occured in 1981 with the semi final between Wolverhampton Wanderers and Tottenham Hotspur at Hillsborough.

The same gate was opened as people tried to get into the ground as people pushed to get through the turnstiles quickly and thankfully at the Leppings Lane end that day, they had no segregation / individual pens at the time, people could move outwards to the corners of the terracing, something that couldn't be done in 1989.

Most of us learn from our mistakes, I try to anyway, but it would appear those in 1981 didn't. Shame on all that were involved in 1981 and in 1989, you had been warned!
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#6 Posted : 13 September 2012 14:38:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Why the focus on senior police officers?

If there is to be a legal review, it would surely be appropriate also to consider the standing of all those other officers and other ranks who 'doctored' their statements - apparently they all did (!) - on the instruction of their seniors. This falsified the record, the rest is history.

Being told to do something that is patently wrong while acting under orders - the so-called Nuremberg defense - offers no defense in international criminal law.

I wonder if it will be the same here, or will just a few face the music while so many others are overlooked?
pseudonym  
#7 Posted : 13 September 2012 15:01:41(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Lets seperate the Miner's strike from Hillsborough shall we?
Rants have their place -but do they serve any reeal use, especially when they degenerate into into politically motivated ones. Never discus politic or religion at work, it will only ever end badly (unless you're a politician or ordained priest or equivalent)

Many things were done wrong and some may be subject to criminal investigation - so best leave it at that. It was a tragedy and lessons have been and are still being learned from it.
DP  
#8 Posted : 13 September 2012 15:07:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

pseudonym - you separate what you want and I'm not at work I'm in a public forum stating my opinion as you are.
pseudonym  
#9 Posted : 13 September 2012 15:24:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Apologies, but what is the the connection between the Miner's strike and Hillsborough - I dont see why you see fit to introduce something that isn't connected.

Yes Police altered statements and lied ... ...
Yes Conservative Government in power at the time -- so what is the connection
Yes it all happened a long time ago and people have long memories - believe me I know people who always hated Churchill because of of the Tonypandy Riots - but what drew you to make the connection. Please enlighten me?
And I try to remember it is a public foreum so I try not to get into defamatory statements
DP  
#10 Posted : 13 September 2012 15:38:22(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

You probably don’t get the connection or where I'm coming from - sorry - its sometime easy for poster to assume we all do but if you had an understanding of the strike and how miners were portrayed in Tory papers like the Sun and by other media' cronies. How they were treated whilst on strike by various Police forces across the country and what did the general public see?? Violent thug running havoc - how do you think that version of events got into the media and onto your TV and papers?

The connection I'm making the similarities gross inaccuracy of the facts in the two cases leading to the general public having a completely distorted version of what actually occurred. By the same people.

I'm certainly not connecting two in any other similarities - just how lies were told by that particular Gov.
pseudonym  
#11 Posted : 13 September 2012 16:00:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

I have downloaded yesterday's Report

http://www.official-docu...c1213/hc05/0581/0581.pdf

Its 389 pages long so it will take a little while to read through, rather than rely on the filter of the popular press and other media outlets.
hilary  
#12 Posted : 13 September 2012 16:11:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
hilary

I remember sitting with my husband watching the Hillsborough disaster, the ordinary public were the heroes of the day and we shouldn't ever forget what they did to save lives - tearing down hoardings to use as makeshift stretchers, administering to the injured, helping where they could - it was a disaster on a national scale but a moment when the man in the street became the hero of the hour.

Mistakes are made in life - with the benefit of hindsight we could and would all be perfect, but this is real life and we have to accept that however tragic, it was initially a mistake. It became a travesty when the lies and cover up started and continued despite investigations over the years and despite the families needing closure. This is similar to the News International cover up, or the Steven Lawrence enquiry, or even the miners strike, where the powers that be close rank and we hear what we are told, not necessarily, what is the truth. Thankfully, things are beginning to come to light quicker these days and we can only hope that a new era of transparency is dawning.

Comparisons can be drawn to many different news events and national disasters - each person makes their own connections based on their life and experience, doesn't make them wrong. The only thing we should all agree on is that we need more honestly and integrity at the top of the tree to ensure that this disgusting state of affairs never again comes to pass.
redken  
#13 Posted : 13 September 2012 16:16:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
redken

pseudonym wrote:
Apologies, but what is the the connection between the Miner's strike and Hillsborough - I dont see why you see fit to introduce something that isn't connected.


I don't really think we should be discussing this topic on the forum but to answer the above point:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/new...south-yorkshire-19587118
pseudonym  
#14 Posted : 13 September 2012 16:39:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
pseudonym

Fully agree - this is the wrong forum for this discussion.


Shouldn't have responded to original posts and guilty of prolonging the discussion.
Me - I'm off home to read the Report and promise will not post on this topic again

DP  
#15 Posted : 13 September 2012 16:41:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

Redken thanks for that - I disagree with your point though - one of the overriding facts in getting to the truth of Hillsborough was the internet - people taking and sharing knowledge of the facts - then putting pressure on the powers - you will or may recall it was an online petition of 100,000 which forced this to be brought to house.

stuie  
#16 Posted : 13 September 2012 20:00:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stuie

Whatever the politics - just as long as those that have hidden the truth, and have done wrong by those who lost their lives, and their families; are brought to justice!
It would be an even worse travesty of justice if they are not.
John J  
#17 Posted : 13 September 2012 20:36:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John J

Some things never change.
I read the report last night and was appalled at the actions of the police but moreso at the conduct of the Sun.
They have yet to apologise for their failure to investigate the fans side of the story. So far they have merely blamed the police.
This is the same tactic they still use to promote their own agenda, ignoring the facts to sell copy.
Thankfully the head of the Yorkshire police is recommending action be taken against the criminals who doctored evidence.
The strangest thing of all is that Mrs Thatcher visited the stadium and spoke with the police that day. The only record available was her schedule.
Tigers  
#18 Posted : 14 September 2012 09:21:04(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Tigers

I'm not sure I heard right on the news last night but I thought the fact the stadium had not got a licence to hold the match was mentioned. If so:

1) Why was the match held if there were concerns?

2)Who issues the licence and should they enforce their findings?

3)Should the FA be held to account too, for allowing an uncertified match to take place?
Crusader  
#19 Posted : 14 September 2012 09:45:08(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Crusader

I've been to a cup semi at Hillsborough and was at that end of the ground. Didn't encounter any problems and it was same the Police force. There's no such thing as a bad road - only bad driving by those using it.
Mains16027  
#20 Posted : 14 September 2012 11:01:34(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Mains16027

Crusader wrote:
I've been to a cup semi at Hillsborough and was at that end of the ground. Didn't encounter any problems and it was same the Police force. There's no such thing as a bad road - only bad driving by those using it.


Would you care to elaborate on what you mean by this statement as it could be construed as blaming the fans? Obviously, I would like to think that isn’t what you mean, as after 23 years of campaigning there is now unequivocal exoneration of the football fans involved on that day.
Steveeckersley  
#21 Posted : 14 September 2012 11:24:25(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Steveeckersley

Crusader wrote:
I've been to a cup semi at Hillsborough and was at that end of the ground. Didn't encounter any problems and it was same the Police force. There's no such thing as a bad road - only bad driving by those using it.

Yes their is a bad road - its about design (ergonomics) Are you saying a careful motorcyclist is to blame for hitting a pothole and coming off his bike!
The safety certificate question si in my opinion something that needs to be explored in Depth given that my understanding that the approval of the game undertaking is based on having one -being presented to the police and the officials and signing off so the match can go ahead.

The question is now are some ageing stadiums fit for purpose and should their be a lifespan on them.
As aBlackpool supporters Ive seen our stadium change over the years from the decrepid old stadium that used to be. For those who have been to both Wembleys I know which one I would choose to watch a game and it doesnt have 2 towers!
KAJ Safe  
#22 Posted : 14 September 2012 11:56:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
KAJ Safe

Crusader wrote:
I've been to a cup semi at Hillsborough and was at that end of the ground. Didn't encounter any problems and it was same the Police force. There's no such thing as a bad road - only bad driving by those using it.

Listen to what has been said and dump any preconceived ideas.
In a nutshell, to get the Prime Minister to apologise publicly and the head of SY Police to consider reporting themselves to the complaints authority, I think you are looking up this "road" with blinkers on.

I am amazed people still blame the "drivers" after everything that has been said in the last few days.

Crusader  
#23 Posted : 14 September 2012 17:05:28(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Crusader

Yes the police made mistakes but the fans aren't blameless. They are shown on film climbing over walls. If only people would queue and wait their turn. South Yorkshire Police should not be getting this level of blame. My thoughts are with them also.
John J  
#24 Posted : 14 September 2012 18:08:34(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
John J

Crusader wrote:
Yes the police made mistakes but the fans aren't blameless. They are shown on film climbing over walls. If only people would queue and wait their turn. South Yorkshire Police should not be getting this level of blame. My thoughts are with them also.


I'd suggest you take the opportunity to read the report before you comment.
I have no sympathy for the police who lied and have prolonged the suffering of the families. They also failed to acted the crisis unfurled which likely resulted in 41 of the victims dying who could have been saved.
They also claimed the fans made lewd comments about the injured, urinated on and robbed the dead and attacked the rescuers. All lies to protect their own careers without thought for the victims or their families. They trawled the police database to find information to discredit the dead and carried out blood alcohol tests on children.

They deserve to be put on trial and face the full force of the law that they bound to uphold and failed to do.
Mudmuppet  
#25 Posted : 14 September 2012 18:30:59(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Mudmuppet

I think the past culture that lead to the erection of the fencing is to blame, if it was not for a violent minority the fencing that trapped those poor victims would not have been in place to cause the tragedy in the first place.
I remember the football violence back before the disaster, it was getting out of hand.
firesafety101  
#26 Posted : 14 September 2012 18:54:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I don't know what regs were in place at the time but who signed the fire/safety certificate? Has anyone asked that question?

It is so obvious that the fire exits were inadequate and many many more would have lost their lives if a fire had occurred in the stand behind that pen.

Perhaps if the fire exits from the pen were adequate this disaster would not have occurred?
DP  
#27 Posted : 14 September 2012 20:15:33(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

Crusader - I appreciate that for 23 year people could have taken your view, due to the lies - thats why they did it to cover it all up.

but are you actually being serious here?
RayRapp  
#28 Posted : 16 September 2012 21:33:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I don't about the fans being blameless but clearly the actions of the police on the day of the tragedy and the deceit which has since unfolded is a disgrace to those who lost their lives. Of course the other tragedy is that those who deliberately falsified witness statements and lied should have been identified earlier and brought to book. It's not too late for some, but not sure how much satisfaction it will bring all these years later when most of those involved have retired or died.

There are a lot of good things in this world, however with the phone tapping scandal, banking fiasco, church abuse of children and now police corruption - it does make you wonder who if anyone you can trust.
jfw  
#29 Posted : 16 September 2012 22:48:23(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
jfw

Following an interesting debate with friends in the pub on Friday night, following the publication of the report, (1 x H&S Manager, 2 x senior police officers and a very left wing, anti-establishment friend), I have downloaded and read the report with interest. All 389 pages.

As has been widely reported in the media various organisations come out of it very badly :-

South Yorkshire Police – poor planning, poor policing on the day, poor communication, poor decisions made and then the cover up.

South Yorkshire Metropolitan Ambulance Service – failing to initiate the major disaster procedures, poor/lack of management.

Sheffield Wednesday FC – poor stewarding, unsuitable stadium, ground not complying with Green Guide, capacities of terraces incorrectly calculated, out of date safety certificate, (certificate was over 10 years old and had not been updated following significant changes to the ground, specifically the Leppings Lane terrace).

The Consultant Engineers – who issued a report disregarding the stadium’s failure to meet the requirements of the Green Guide.

Sheffield City Council – failing to issue a current safety certificate, the quality of safety inspections and the lack of documentation of safety inspections.

But having read it, I find 2 things strange, unless I have missed something.

Firstly the FA do not come in for any real criticism or blame. I find this strange as they were the organisation staging the event and had effectively hired the venue for the day. Surely the FA had a duty of care to ensure that the organisations that they were contracting were suitable ? After all that’s what happens when a company hires contractors as has been discussed widely in other topics on this forum.

Secondly, its to do with whether there were ticketless Liverpool fans. While it has been widely reported that the report vindicates the fans, the report contains great detail disproving various allegations concerning the fans behaviour, but I can’t find in the report clear evidence that there were no ticketless fans.

I believe that the report should have gone deeper, to clearly resolve this point. The capacity of the terrace was 10,100 and the only reference to the number on it is in the HSE report which estimates 10,124, but from the report, there were still fans in the tunnel leading under the stand onto the terrace.

I am just surprised that the report makes no real reference to the number of fans on the terrace at the time of the incident other than various estimates within pens 3 and 4. Surely this could have easily be done from CCTV and TV footage ?

Because the report has not fully addressed this issue, you are still going to get comments like many above, who will continue to question the fans involvement, despite the publication of this report.

If there were ticketless fans on that terrace on that afternoon, then they are just as compliant in what happened as the police officers who were involved in the cover up.
boblewis  
#30 Posted : 01 October 2012 14:42:46(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

jfw

The comments about ticketless fans were an assertion made by the discredited Duckinfield - once the exit gate was opened NO checking of tickets was done so there is absolutely no evidence of ticketless fans. The crush OUTSIDE the ground was so bad that fans were being crushed in the melee outside the ground. The police failed to use the good crowd control plan outside the ground that had worked so effectively on previous occassions. The police failed to use the information they had effectively and were in charge of preventing ambulance entry onto the ground. The police have no evidence of even checking the existence of the ground safety certificate. An incompetent officer at ground control was placed in charge by Senior officers. I think belated prosecutions have to be brought.

Bob
Hally  
#31 Posted : 01 October 2012 15:06:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

Crusader wrote:
Yes the police made mistakes but the fans aren't blameless. They are shown on film climbing over walls. If only people would queue and wait their turn. South Yorkshire Police should not be getting this level of blame. My thoughts are with them also.


Shown on film climbing over walls?

Well done, you do realise those 'fans not blameless climbing over walls' into the ground were actually being seriously crushed outside between the decrepid turnstyles and the outer perimeter gates which led from Leppings Lane itself as this was a very restricted area and the police decided to not close the gates off from the road itself. Would you rather they just died outside as well or maybe they'd like to actually get out of the massive crush outside and were climbing over walls of the ground and over the railings as well which didn't lead into the ground but back into the road etc...

Also, well done for surviving that end. A crush also happened in 1988 when the police actually did a half decent job.

You do also know that in 1981 there was a serious crush of spurs fans at that end which almost resulted in deaths but thankfully only injuries. Luckily for the spurs fans the pens as were in 88 and 89 were not the same, they were actually able to move sideways across the terracing into less poplulated areas. Unlike in 88 and 89 when if you were getting crushed you had nowhere to go.

Honestly, if you don't have a clue what you are talking about don't talk about it and get the wrong end of the stick.
Hally  
#32 Posted : 01 October 2012 15:13:28(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

jfw,

They had decided in 89 not to close the gate across the central tunnel. They did the previous year when it was already packed and people were being crushed. The gate they opened (Gate C i think) to the stand itself led many fans to the tunnel and tunnel only as no obvious other ways into the terracing were visible and unfortunately although the police control room were aware of the very serious overcrowding and crushing didn't close the gate to stop any other fans getting in, hence when they opened the gate fans were oblivious to the fact it was already well overcrowded and went into the pens before they had a chance to realise this. Not easy to turn round in a large crowd to head the other way.

I've been in plenty of away ends over the years where they forced everyone into a crowded pen rather than open another empty pen next door. Its not a very nice thing to be involved in even with people just receiving minor injuries not on the 89 scale.
Hally  
#33 Posted : 01 October 2012 15:15:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Hally

And the tapes from the CCTV room went missing...it would have shown what the Police could see in those two pens.
boblewis  
#34 Posted : 01 October 2012 20:25:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Hally

It just shows how good organisations are at hiding their faults. Apologies are very cheap compared to the damage done.

Bob
DP  
#35 Posted : 29 October 2012 17:56:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
DP

IOSH Merseyside Branch are running an event on Friday the 14th of December at Liverpool Cricket Ground - Steve Rotherham is a guest speaker who will be sharing his experiences of Hillsborough.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.