Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
awardle  
#1 Posted : 02 October 2012 16:36:36(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
awardle

Dear forum members,
I've been asked to produce a risk assessment for machining blocks of lead in a lathe. I've read through the information on the HSE website. The machining process should take less than a day in total. If the operator wears disposable gloves the exposure wil mainly be from dust, vapour or fume. Is the correct control measure to ensure that the cutting tool as a constant flow of coolant ?
Also that any lead swarm is disposed of as hazardous waste ? Does anyone have any experience of machining lead or a suitable risk assessment ?
Thanks

Palmer20061  
#2 Posted : 02 October 2012 16:45:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Palmer20061

Without reading the Control of Lead at Work regulations, won't you also have to carry out blood lead level testing before & after as well as some occ hygiene monitoring during? I guess as you've identified dust as a potential problem you'll need a suitable mask that has been face fit tested.
Alex Whittle  
#3 Posted : 02 October 2012 17:42:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Alex Whittle

My experience of turning / milling is a little rusty, but the rule of thumb that has stuck with me is:-The harder the work material, the slower the cutting speed. The softer the work material the faster the recommended cutting speed. With this in mind you are more likely to send chippings / swarf / dust airborne.
Constant flow cutting fluid will definitely suppress / reduce the airborne particulate. I would recommend RPE as a preventative measure as you has suggested and tight fitting machinists gloves (entrapment). Other factors; no hand to mouth activities and suitable local washing facilities and manual handling issues.
As for the biological monitoring, as with health surveillance is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the controls that you have in place. I am not sure if this would be beneficial for the duration of the 1 day task that you propose. If this task was performed on a more frequent basis then monitoring would be required.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.