Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Kim Hedges  
#1 Posted : 03 October 2012 16:46:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kim Hedges

I recently completed my 3a & 3b certificate for the boom and scissor lift as an operator using Mobile Elevating Work Platforms. During the training, it came to my attention that an operator can get crushed to death because the top of the cage does not have any barriers (like a roll cage). I personally think designers could come up with something to solve this such as a moveable bar. The other 'design fault' as far as I am concerned, is that there isn't any internal bars to hold onto, so if you (or more likely your co-worker) are not paying attention you can get your fingers crushed or decapitated -- this could be solved with an internal hand rail. Am I the first to think of this?
BernDaley  
#2 Posted : 04 October 2012 07:41:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
BernDaley

Hi Kim, Roll cages do exist. Various designs that can be retrofitted onto various baskets. Google search industry magazines such as vertikal or cranes & access will come up with such articles. Bern
Kim Hedges  
#3 Posted : 05 October 2012 01:59:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kim Hedges

Yeah I thought they might, but I am aghast at such poor design for this plant. Everything I've learnt about safe systems of work and designing out risks seems to have been forgotten in the design of this plant. The only reason this plant came into existence, was to make working at height safer. The products I used were typical hire machines, so if you happen to work for a company as a contractor/freelancer/soletrader you don't get the option.
firesafety101  
#4 Posted : 05 October 2012 19:03:02(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I recently heard of an accident where a MEWP operator was raising the cage and he came into contact with a rotating ceiling fan. It knocked off his hard hat and almost scalped him. It was his fault for not ensuring the overhead hazards were made safe but your idea for a roll cage or similar may have saved him from harm. Good idea but what about the cost?
Kim Hedges  
#5 Posted : 06 October 2012 18:36:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kim Hedges

From what I can make out, the design of MEWPs has not changed since they were first introduced, unlike other plant and equipment -- if there has been change I have not seen it. As for the cost, better initial design could make MEWPs safer and cut costs, it's all down to imagination again.
Michele  
#6 Posted : 07 October 2012 13:29:50(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Michele

Hi Kim There have been some changes to 3B mewps, there is now a system called ski siren that is an anti-entrapment device and has been adopted by Nationawide, this is now a mandatory require for Skanska when using this type of machine. http://www.nationwidepla...antientrapment-solution/ Michele
Kim Hedges  
#7 Posted : 08 October 2012 12:53:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kim Hedges

Thanks for the link and for anybody else reading this and not sure what 3a 3b is here is another link: http://www.ipaf.org/en/training/categories/
Plant trainer  
#8 Posted : 08 October 2012 13:46:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Plant trainer

You might find downloading a copy of this useful.http://www.cpa.uk.net/p/MEWPS-and-Overhead-Crushing/ Steve
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.