Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Redders  
#1 Posted : 22 October 2012 21:25:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Redders

Several members of staff were exposed to a small amount of asbestos-containing pipe lagging. Although the risk to health was assessed as being very low, it was recommended that they have the exposure documented on their health record via their GP. One person is worried that this information may become known to an insurer if they take out a new life insurance policy and this could lead to increased premiums. They have asked if, in this eventuality, the employer would pay the difference in premium.

I have suggested that the employer's insurer and solicitor are contacted for advice and I am aware that this is a bit of a minefield with regards to liability for the exposure, the probability of disease development, etc.

Has anyone come across a similar situation and are they aware of any guidance or source of information for the employer and staff?
Redders  
#2 Posted : 22 October 2012 22:29:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Redders

I have now had chance to investigate this further and found some appropriate guidance on the BMA website. Standard guidance and relevant information has been developed in an agreement between the BMA and the ABI (Association of British Insurers). Information provided in a medical report should be restricted to:
1. Current health
2. Time off work in last 3 years
3. Past health
4. History of disease among parents or siblings.
Information on life insurance applicants would be restricted to any medical conditions which could lead to a premature death - not an applicant's quality of life.

So, an insurance company would never be informed by a GP of an exposure to asbestos and the matters of declining cover or increased premiums should never be an issue.
Irwin43241  
#3 Posted : 23 October 2012 08:26:13(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Good to know this. Thanks for the info John.
Bruce Sutherland  
#4 Posted : 23 October 2012 09:06:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Bruce Sutherland

Hi John

One reasons why documenting with a GP is often recommended is that that chance of NHS records going missing is considered (all things being equal) to be much lower than employer records particularly in the construction sector where there is a lot of transient employment. So it is good to hear that the privacy bit still works.

Kind regards

Bruce
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.